Appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy- a retrospective comparative study of 99 pregnant and 1796 non-pregnant women.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03517-3
Michael Hoffmann, L Anthuber, A Herebia da Silva, A Mair, S Wolf, C Dannecker, M Anthuber, M Schrempf
{"title":"Appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy- a retrospective comparative study of 99 pregnant and 1796 non-pregnant women.","authors":"Michael Hoffmann, L Anthuber, A Herebia da Silva, A Mair, S Wolf, C Dannecker, M Anthuber, M Schrempf","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03517-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suspected appendicitis is the most common indication for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Diagnosis and management of these patients can be challenging. Atypical clinical presentation has been described before, but the current literature consists mostly of small case series. Therefore, we conducted a large retrospective study to analyze the frequency and diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs, laboratory findings and imaging modalities in pregnant woman undergoing surgery for suspected appendicitis compared to a control group of non-pregnant women of childbearing age. We further describe intra- and postoperative findings in both groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy were retrieved from the electronic patient database and analyzed. Preoperative clinical, laboratory and imaging findings as well as intra- and postoperative characteristics were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2008 and June 2023, 99 pregnant woman and 1796 non-pregnant woman between the ages of 16 and 49 underwent emergency surgery for suspected appendicitis. Pregnant women were less likely to have right lower quadrant tenderness (p = 0.002), guarding (p = 0.011) and rebound tenderness (p = 0.097). A greater percentage of pregnant women had a symptom duration of more than 24 h before presentation (p = 0.003) Abdominal ultrasound showed a reduced diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women (p = 0.004). MRI was used in eight pregnant women and showed a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. Pregnant women had a longer operating time (p = 0.006), a higher rate of open appendectomies or conversion (p < 0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (3.2 days vs. 2.2 days, p < 0.001). The perforation rate was also higher in pregnant women at 16% vs. 10% (p = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy presents a challenge for the clinician. Our data confirm the paradigm of \"atypical presentation\" which should lead to an extended diagnostic workup. Ultrasound showed less diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women in our study. MRI is a useful tool to reduce uncertainty and the rate of negative appendectomies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03517-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Suspected appendicitis is the most common indication for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Diagnosis and management of these patients can be challenging. Atypical clinical presentation has been described before, but the current literature consists mostly of small case series. Therefore, we conducted a large retrospective study to analyze the frequency and diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs, laboratory findings and imaging modalities in pregnant woman undergoing surgery for suspected appendicitis compared to a control group of non-pregnant women of childbearing age. We further describe intra- and postoperative findings in both groups.

Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy were retrieved from the electronic patient database and analyzed. Preoperative clinical, laboratory and imaging findings as well as intra- and postoperative characteristics were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Results: Between January 2008 and June 2023, 99 pregnant woman and 1796 non-pregnant woman between the ages of 16 and 49 underwent emergency surgery for suspected appendicitis. Pregnant women were less likely to have right lower quadrant tenderness (p = 0.002), guarding (p = 0.011) and rebound tenderness (p = 0.097). A greater percentage of pregnant women had a symptom duration of more than 24 h before presentation (p = 0.003) Abdominal ultrasound showed a reduced diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women (p = 0.004). MRI was used in eight pregnant women and showed a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. Pregnant women had a longer operating time (p = 0.006), a higher rate of open appendectomies or conversion (p < 0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (3.2 days vs. 2.2 days, p < 0.001). The perforation rate was also higher in pregnant women at 16% vs. 10% (p = 0.048).

Conclusion: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy presents a challenge for the clinician. Our data confirm the paradigm of "atypical presentation" which should lead to an extended diagnostic workup. Ultrasound showed less diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women in our study. MRI is a useful tool to reduce uncertainty and the rate of negative appendectomies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期疑似阑尾炎的阑尾切除术--对 99 名孕妇和 1796 名非孕妇的回顾性比较研究。
导言疑似阑尾炎是孕期非产科手术最常见的适应症。对这些患者的诊断和处理具有挑战性。以前曾有过非典型临床表现的描述,但目前的文献大多由小型病例系列组成。因此,我们进行了一项大型回顾性研究,分析了因怀疑阑尾炎而接受手术的孕妇与对照组非妊娠育龄妇女的临床症状、实验室检查结果和影像学检查的频率和诊断准确性。我们进一步描述了两组患者术中和术后的检查结果:我们从患者电子数据库中检索并分析了因妊娠期疑似阑尾炎而接受阑尾切除术的连续患者的数据。结果:在 2008 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,妊娠妇女和非妊娠妇女的术前临床、实验室和影像学检查结果以及术中和术后特征进行了比较:结果:2008 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月间,年龄在 16 岁至 49 岁之间的 99 名孕妇和 1796 名非孕妇因疑似阑尾炎接受了急诊手术。孕妇出现右下腹压痛(p = 0.002)、保护性压痛(p = 0.011)和反弹性压痛(p = 0.097)的几率较低。腹部超声显示孕妇的诊断准确性降低(p = 0.004)。核磁共振成像用于 8 名孕妇,诊断准确率为 100%。孕妇的手术时间更长(P = 0.006),开腹阑尾切除术或转为开腹阑尾切除术的比例更高(P妊娠期急性阑尾炎的诊断给临床医生带来了挑战。我们的数据证实了 "非典型表现 "的模式,这应导致扩大诊断范围。在我们的研究中,超声波对孕妇的诊断准确性较低。磁共振成像是减少不确定性和阑尾切除阴性率的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Intensified outpatient nutrition management improves body weight and skeletal muscle loss after esophageal cancer surgery: a single-center, retrospective, single-arm clinical study. Assessment of first-touch skills in robotic surgical training using hi-Sim and the hinotori surgical robot system among surgeons and novices. Comparing surgical outcomes of powered versus manual surgical staplers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 3D vs. 2D-4 K: Performance and self-perception of laparoscopic novices in a randomized prospective teaching intervention using standard tasks and box trainers. Research methodologies for eliciting patients' preferences in invasive procedures: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1