Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7
Heinz Wykypiel, Philipp Gehwolf, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Valeria Wagner, Andreas Puecher, Thomas Schmid, Fergül Cakar-Beck, Aline Schäfer
{"title":"Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.","authors":"Heinz Wykypiel, Philipp Gehwolf, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Valeria Wagner, Andreas Puecher, Thomas Schmid, Fergül Cakar-Beck, Aline Schäfer","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program.

Results: A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%).

Conclusions: With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创食管切除术的临床实施。
背景:微创手术正成为全球食管癌切除术的首选方法:微创手术正成为全球食管癌切除术的首选方法:对一家三级医疗中心前瞻性收集的临床数据进行回顾性分析,并详细描述该计划的过程:2010年至2023年期间,共进行了136例经胸食管切除术。研究组包括 116 例手术,其中 69 例为全微创手术,47 例为混合手术。研究组中 80.0% 的手术采用了多模式方法。中位手术时间为431分钟(± 103)。R0切除率为100%。42名患者(36.2%)无术后并发症。术后 Clavien-Dindo > IIIb 级发病率为 27%。术后90天死亡率为1.7%。最后四分之一癌症患者切除的淋巴结平均数量为31个。再次手术的吻合口不全率为4%(Ivor-Lewis为4.2%,McKeown为5%):凭借在高端微创腹腔和胸腔手术方面的丰富经验,实施微创食管切除术是可行的,其临床和肿瘤结果也在普遍接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Impact of overweight on patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: analysis of surgical outcomes in a high-volume center. Reappraisal of safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: it is feasible for the pioneer surgical team. Global collaborative research in metabolic and bariatric surgery (GCRMBS): current status and directions for the future. Long-term outcomes of robot versus video-assisted thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity matched analysis. Modified screw-rod fixation for management of posterior pelvic ring fractures: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1