Heinz Wykypiel, Philipp Gehwolf, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Valeria Wagner, Andreas Puecher, Thomas Schmid, Fergül Cakar-Beck, Aline Schäfer
{"title":"Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.","authors":"Heinz Wykypiel, Philipp Gehwolf, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Valeria Wagner, Andreas Puecher, Thomas Schmid, Fergül Cakar-Beck, Aline Schäfer","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program.
Results: A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%).
Conclusions: With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible.