Evaluating the Value of Eye-Tracking Augmented Debriefing in Medical Simulation-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000825
Heather Braund, Andrew K Hall, Kyla Caners, Melanie Walker, Damon Dagnone, Jonathan Sherbino, Matthew Sibbald, Bingxian Wang, Daniel Howes, Andrew G Day, William Wu, Adam Szulewski
{"title":"Evaluating the Value of Eye-Tracking Augmented Debriefing in Medical Simulation-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Heather Braund, Andrew K Hall, Kyla Caners, Melanie Walker, Damon Dagnone, Jonathan Sherbino, Matthew Sibbald, Bingxian Wang, Daniel Howes, Andrew G Day, William Wu, Adam Szulewski","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Debriefing after simulation facilitates reflective thinking and learning. Eye-tracking augmented debriefing (ETAD) may provide advantages over traditional debriefing (TD) by leveraging video replay with first-person perspective. This multisite randomized controlled trial compared the impact of ETAD with TD (without eye-tracking and without video) after simulation on 4 outcomes: (1) resident metacognitive awareness (the primary outcome), (2) cognitive load (CL) of residents and debriefers, (3) alignment of resident self-assessment and debriefer assessment scores, and (4) resident and debriefer perceptions of the debriefing experience.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty-four emergency medicine residents from 2 institutions were randomized to the experimental (ETAD) or the control (TD) arm. Residents completed 2 simulation stations followed by debriefing. Before station 1 and after station 2, residents completed a Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI). After each station, debriefers and residents rated their CL and completed an assessment of performance. After the stations, residents were interviewed and debriefers participated in a focus group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in mean MAI change, resident CL, or assessment alignment between residents and debriefers. Debriefer CL was lower in the experimental arm. Interviews identified 4 themes: (1) reflections related to debriefing approach, (2) eye-tracking as a metacognitive sensitizer, (3) translation of metacognition to practice, and (4) ETAD as a strategy to manage CL. Residents reported that eye tracking improved the specificity of feedback. Debriefers relied less on notes, leveraged video timestamps, appreciated the structure of the eye-tracking video, and found the video useful when debriefing poor performers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant quantitative differences in MAI or resident CL scores; qualitative findings suggest that residents appreciated the benefits of the eye-tracking video review. Debriefers expended less CL and reported less perceived mental effort with the new technology. Future research should leverage longitudinal experimental designs to further understand the impact of eye-tracking facilitated debriefing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Debriefing after simulation facilitates reflective thinking and learning. Eye-tracking augmented debriefing (ETAD) may provide advantages over traditional debriefing (TD) by leveraging video replay with first-person perspective. This multisite randomized controlled trial compared the impact of ETAD with TD (without eye-tracking and without video) after simulation on 4 outcomes: (1) resident metacognitive awareness (the primary outcome), (2) cognitive load (CL) of residents and debriefers, (3) alignment of resident self-assessment and debriefer assessment scores, and (4) resident and debriefer perceptions of the debriefing experience.

Method: Fifty-four emergency medicine residents from 2 institutions were randomized to the experimental (ETAD) or the control (TD) arm. Residents completed 2 simulation stations followed by debriefing. Before station 1 and after station 2, residents completed a Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI). After each station, debriefers and residents rated their CL and completed an assessment of performance. After the stations, residents were interviewed and debriefers participated in a focus group.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in mean MAI change, resident CL, or assessment alignment between residents and debriefers. Debriefer CL was lower in the experimental arm. Interviews identified 4 themes: (1) reflections related to debriefing approach, (2) eye-tracking as a metacognitive sensitizer, (3) translation of metacognition to practice, and (4) ETAD as a strategy to manage CL. Residents reported that eye tracking improved the specificity of feedback. Debriefers relied less on notes, leveraged video timestamps, appreciated the structure of the eye-tracking video, and found the video useful when debriefing poor performers.

Conclusions: There were no significant quantitative differences in MAI or resident CL scores; qualitative findings suggest that residents appreciated the benefits of the eye-tracking video review. Debriefers expended less CL and reported less perceived mental effort with the new technology. Future research should leverage longitudinal experimental designs to further understand the impact of eye-tracking facilitated debriefing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医学模拟中眼动追踪增强汇报的价值--随机对照试验。
简介模拟后的汇报有助于反思和学习。与传统汇报(TD)相比,眼动追踪增强汇报(ETAD)通过利用视频回放和第一人称视角,可提供更多优势。这项多站点随机对照试验比较了 ETAD 与 TD(无眼球追踪和无视频)在模拟后对以下 4 项结果的影响:(1)住院医师元认知意识(主要结果);(2)住院医师和汇报者的认知负荷(CL);(3)住院医师自我评估和汇报者评估分数的一致性;以及(4)住院医师和汇报者对汇报体验的看法:来自两所院校的 54 名急诊科住院医师被随机分配到实验组(ETAD)或对照组(TD)。住院医师完成 2 个模拟站后进行汇报。在第一站之前和第二站之后,住院医师完成了元认知意识量表(MAI)。每个模拟站结束后,汇报者和住院医生都会对他们的 CL 进行评分,并完成绩效评估。站点结束后,居民接受了访谈,汇报者参加了焦点小组:结果:在平均 MAI 变化、居民 CL 或评估一致性方面,居民和汇报者之间没有明显的统计学差异。实验组的汇报员CL较低。访谈确定了 4 个主题:(1) 与汇报方法有关的反思,(2) 作为元认知敏化剂的眼动追踪,(3) 将元认知转化为实践,(4) 作为管理 CL 策略的 ETAD。住院医师报告说,眼动追踪提高了反馈的针对性。汇报者减少了对笔记的依赖,充分利用了视频时间戳,对眼动追踪视频的结构表示赞赏,并发现视频在向表现不佳者汇报时非常有用:在 MAI 或住院医生 CL 评分方面没有明显的量化差异;定性研究结果表明,住院医生对眼动追踪视频审查的益处表示赞赏。汇报者花费的CL较少,并且报告称使用新技术后他们感觉到的脑力消耗也较少。未来的研究应利用纵向实验设计来进一步了解眼动追踪促进汇报的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Monitoring Technician Performance in High-Fidelity Simulations of Remote Patient Monitoring: An Exploratory Study. Bridging Two Worlds: A Basic Scientist's Transformative Path in Healthcare Simulation. Measuring Residents' Competence in Chest Tube Insertion on Thiel-Embalmed Bodies: A Validity Study. Call to Action: Honoring Simulated Participants and Collaborating With Simulated Participant Educators. When Simulation Becomes Reality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1