Health Promoting School Program From Affordable Health Initiative: Implementation Process in Brazilian Schools.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of School Health Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1111/josh.13526
Bárbara da Silva Mourthé Matoso, Viviane E Gomes, Marcelo Nakao, Najara B da Rocha, Wagner Marcenes, Raquel C Ferreira
{"title":"Health Promoting School Program From Affordable Health Initiative: Implementation Process in Brazilian Schools.","authors":"Bárbara da Silva Mourthé Matoso, Viviane E Gomes, Marcelo Nakao, Najara B da Rocha, Wagner Marcenes, Raquel C Ferreira","doi":"10.1111/josh.13526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated stakeholders' perceptions regarding the initial implementation process of the health promoting school model proposed by the affordable health initiative (AHI HPS model) in schools of Belo Horizonte/BRA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model has been implemented since 2019, by an implementation committee (IC) with members from university, health, and education sectors. Data were collected from records of the IC meetings (n = 10) and interviews with 5 IC members to evaluate the model's acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility. The material was decomposed by content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two categories and 7 subcategories emerged, suggesting that stakeholders found the model straightforward and well-suited to schools. Facilitators (teamwork, motivation, commitment, teacher's central role, inclusive decision-making, intersectoral responsibility pact, model alignment with school context) and barriers (family involvement, time constraints for curriculum integration, financial resource, school infrastructure, records difficulties, university unawareness of the school context) to implementation were presented.</p><p><strong>Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: </strong>The results highlight the need to involve civil society and decision-makers to make the program feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants showed they accept and intend to contribute to implementing the model. They believe in the program's feasibility as long as teacher involvement is prioritized, and identified barriers are overcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated stakeholders' perceptions regarding the initial implementation process of the health promoting school model proposed by the affordable health initiative (AHI HPS model) in schools of Belo Horizonte/BRA.

Methods: The model has been implemented since 2019, by an implementation committee (IC) with members from university, health, and education sectors. Data were collected from records of the IC meetings (n = 10) and interviews with 5 IC members to evaluate the model's acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility. The material was decomposed by content analysis.

Results: Two categories and 7 subcategories emerged, suggesting that stakeholders found the model straightforward and well-suited to schools. Facilitators (teamwork, motivation, commitment, teacher's central role, inclusive decision-making, intersectoral responsibility pact, model alignment with school context) and barriers (family involvement, time constraints for curriculum integration, financial resource, school infrastructure, records difficulties, university unawareness of the school context) to implementation were presented.

Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: The results highlight the need to involve civil society and decision-makers to make the program feasible.

Conclusion: Participants showed they accept and intend to contribute to implementing the model. They believe in the program's feasibility as long as teacher involvement is prioritized, and identified barriers are overcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负担得起的健康倡议 "中的 "健康促进学校计划":巴西学校的实施过程。
研究背景本研究评估了贝洛奥里藏特/巴西利亚的利益相关者对 "负担得起的健康倡议 "提出的健康促进学校模式(AHI HPS 模式)在学校的初步实施过程的看法:该模式自 2019 年起由一个实施委员会(IC)负责实施,该委员会的成员来自大学、卫生和教育部门。从实施委员会的会议记录(n = 10)和与 5 名实施委员会成员的访谈中收集数据,以评估该模式的可接受性、采用性、适宜性和可行性。通过内容分析对资料进行了分解:出现了两个类别和 7 个子类别,表明利益相关者认为该模式简单明了,非常适合学校。此外,还提出了实施该模式的促进因素(团队合作、动机、承诺、教师的核心作用、包容性决策、跨部门责任契约、模式与学校环境的一致性)和障碍(家庭参与、课程整合的时间限制、财政资源、学校基础设施、记录困难、大学对学校环境的不了解):对学校卫生政策、实践和公平的影响:研究结果突出表明,有必要让民间社会和决策者参与进来,以使该计划切实可行:结论:参与者表示他们接受并打算为实施该模式做出贡献。他们相信,只要优先考虑教师的参与,并克服已发现的障碍,该计划是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
期刊最新文献
Primary School Pupils' Perceptions and Experiences of Wearable Technologies. Racial Disparities in a Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program: Abstinence-Only Versus a Comprehensive Sexuality Education Program. National Health Education Standards: Model Guidance for Curriculum and Instruction (Third Edition). Effect of Delaying High School Start Time on Teen Physical Activity, Screen Use, and Sports and Extracurricular Activity Participation: Results From START. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1