The Association of Glycemic Control Medication Regimens and Preoperative Fructosamine Among Total Joint Artrhoplasty Patients.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01189
Eric H Tischler, Juan D Lizcano, Noam Shohat, Majd Tarabichi, Camilo Restrepo, Javad Parvizi
{"title":"The Association of Glycemic Control Medication Regimens and Preoperative Fructosamine Among Total Joint Artrhoplasty Patients.","authors":"Eric H Tischler, Juan D Lizcano, Noam Shohat, Majd Tarabichi, Camilo Restrepo, Javad Parvizi","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) has classically been used for glycemic control screening before surgery, fructosamine, a short-term glucose variability indicator, has been reported to be a more accurate predictor of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the variability of diabetic medication management, this study aims to identify the associated effect of glycemic control medication regimen (GCMR) on the incidence rate and associated odds of abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels among diabetic primary total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2017 and 2018, consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients were identified, and the final cohort included only diabetic patients. All patients reported preoperative HbA1c and fructosamine levels. GCMR categories included insulin, metformin, and other. Independent risk of GCMR and abnormal fructosamine levels (>293 µmol/L) were identified using multivariable logistic regression, while controlling for preoperative baseline factors including HbA1C.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 420 patients, 15.7% (66/420) were diabetic, of whom 22.7% (15/66) reported an abnormal fructosamine level. Among patients requiring GCMR, 24.0% (18/75), 56.0% (42/75), and 77.7% (58/75) reported using insulin, other, and metformin, respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions demonstrated that insulin-dependent patients with DM reported a 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.096 to 30.213, P = 0.716) increased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels compared with nonactive GCMR patients, whereas patients managed with metformin and other glycemic control medications reported a protective 0.48 (95% CI, 0.418 to 5.407, P = 0.549) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.216 to 4.508, P = 0.393) decreased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, insulin and other GCMR medications exhibited a trend for increased and decreased odds of having abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels while controlling for baseline HbA1c level compared with patients with DM without active GCMR. This association may be explained by multifactorial short-term glucose variability in insulin users, indicating the continued need and optimization of short-term glycemic variations instead of HbA1c.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) has classically been used for glycemic control screening before surgery, fructosamine, a short-term glucose variability indicator, has been reported to be a more accurate predictor of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the variability of diabetic medication management, this study aims to identify the associated effect of glycemic control medication regimen (GCMR) on the incidence rate and associated odds of abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels among diabetic primary total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty patients.

Methods: Between 2017 and 2018, consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients were identified, and the final cohort included only diabetic patients. All patients reported preoperative HbA1c and fructosamine levels. GCMR categories included insulin, metformin, and other. Independent risk of GCMR and abnormal fructosamine levels (>293 µmol/L) were identified using multivariable logistic regression, while controlling for preoperative baseline factors including HbA1C.

Results: Among 420 patients, 15.7% (66/420) were diabetic, of whom 22.7% (15/66) reported an abnormal fructosamine level. Among patients requiring GCMR, 24.0% (18/75), 56.0% (42/75), and 77.7% (58/75) reported using insulin, other, and metformin, respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions demonstrated that insulin-dependent patients with DM reported a 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.096 to 30.213, P = 0.716) increased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels compared with nonactive GCMR patients, whereas patients managed with metformin and other glycemic control medications reported a protective 0.48 (95% CI, 0.418 to 5.407, P = 0.549) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.216 to 4.508, P = 0.393) decreased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels, respectively.

Conclusion: In this study, insulin and other GCMR medications exhibited a trend for increased and decreased odds of having abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels while controlling for baseline HbA1c level compared with patients with DM without active GCMR. This association may be explained by multifactorial short-term glucose variability in insulin users, indicating the continued need and optimization of short-term glycemic variations instead of HbA1c.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全关节人工关节置换术患者的血糖控制用药方案与术前果糖胺的关系。
背景:尽管糖化血红蛋白 A1C(HbA1c)一直被用于术前血糖控制筛查,但据报道,果糖胺(一种短期血糖变化指标)是糖尿病(DM)患者术后假体周围关节感染的更准确预测指标。鉴于糖尿病药物管理的变异性,本研究旨在确定血糖控制药物治疗方案(GCMR)对糖尿病初治全膝关节置换术或全髋关节置换术患者术前果糖胺水平异常的发生率和相关几率的相关影响:2017年至2018年期间,对连续系列的全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术患者进行了鉴定,最终队列仅包括糖尿病患者。所有患者均报告了术前 HbA1c 和果糖胺水平。GCMR 类别包括胰岛素、二甲双胍和其他。使用多变量逻辑回归确定了 GCMR 和果糖胺水平异常(>293 µmol/L)的独立风险,同时控制了包括 HbA1C 在内的术前基线因素:在 420 名患者中,15.7%(66/420)患有糖尿病,其中 22.7%(15/66)报告果糖胺水平异常。在需要进行 GCMR 的患者中,24.0%(18/75)、56.0%(42/75)和 77.7%(58/75)分别报告使用了胰岛素、其他药物和二甲双胍。多变量逻辑回归结果表明,胰岛素依赖型 DM 患者的血脂异常几率为 1.71(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.096 至 30.213,P = 0.716)的果糖胺水平异常几率增加,而使用二甲双胍和其他血糖控制药物的患者果糖胺水平异常几率分别降低了0.48(95% CI,0.418至5.407,P = 0.549)和0.32(95% CI,0.216至4.508,P = 0.393):在这项研究中,与没有活动性 GCMR 的 DM 患者相比,在控制基线 HbA1c 水平的情况下,胰岛素和其他 GCMR 药物显示出术前果糖胺水平异常几率增加和降低的趋势。胰岛素使用者的短期血糖变化可能是造成这种关联的多因素原因,这表明仍有必要优化短期血糖变化,而不是 HbA1c。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
The 2024 Kappa Delta and OREF Awards. The 2024 Kappa Delta Young Investigator Award: Leveraging Insights From Development to Improve Adult Repair: Hedgehog Signaling as a Master Regulator of Enthesis Fibrocartilage Formation. The Role of Amino Acid Supplementation in Orthopaedic Surgery: Erratum. Risk Factors of Failure to Discharge Before "Two Midnights" in Outpatient-Designated Total Hip Arthroplasty. Cost Difference in Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Compared With Hospital-Based Outpatient Departments: Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1