Landmarking for Left-Truncated Competing Risk Data

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Biometrical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1002/bimj.202400083
Theresa Unseld, Tobias Bluhmki, Jan Beyersmann, Evelin Beck, Stephanie Padberg, Regina Stegherr
{"title":"Landmarking for Left-Truncated Competing Risk Data","authors":"Theresa Unseld,&nbsp;Tobias Bluhmki,&nbsp;Jan Beyersmann,&nbsp;Evelin Beck,&nbsp;Stephanie Padberg,&nbsp;Regina Stegherr","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202400083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Landmarking is an alternative to complex multistate models when the aim is to calculate dynamic predictions. We develop the concept of landmarking for the case of left truncation and competing risks from the application background of drug safety assessment in pregnancy. The method is illustrated with a cohort study of the German Embryotox Pharmacovigilance Institute in Berlin to assess if the risk or the cumulative incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, like spontaneous abortions (SABs), is increased in fluoroquinolone-exposed women. Furthermore, we conduct an extensive simulation study to compare the dynamic predictions and coefficient estimates obtained by landmarking to those from nonparametric multistate models and classical time-dependent covariate Cox regression. The results from the simulation study indicate that attenuation of the effects is present in the landmark estimates, also in the complex setting considered here, but the estimates are still close to those from the multistate models. Regarding the Berlin fluoroquinolone data, the fluoroquinolone exposure of a pregnant woman in the first trimester seems to increase her cumulative incidence of elective termination of pregnancy over women never exposed before, but there is no evidence of a significantly increased risk or cumulative incidence in exposed women for SABs. This supports previous results on the same data, which were driven from an analysis without landmarking methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"66 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bimj.202400083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202400083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landmarking is an alternative to complex multistate models when the aim is to calculate dynamic predictions. We develop the concept of landmarking for the case of left truncation and competing risks from the application background of drug safety assessment in pregnancy. The method is illustrated with a cohort study of the German Embryotox Pharmacovigilance Institute in Berlin to assess if the risk or the cumulative incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, like spontaneous abortions (SABs), is increased in fluoroquinolone-exposed women. Furthermore, we conduct an extensive simulation study to compare the dynamic predictions and coefficient estimates obtained by landmarking to those from nonparametric multistate models and classical time-dependent covariate Cox regression. The results from the simulation study indicate that attenuation of the effects is present in the landmark estimates, also in the complex setting considered here, but the estimates are still close to those from the multistate models. Regarding the Berlin fluoroquinolone data, the fluoroquinolone exposure of a pregnant woman in the first trimester seems to increase her cumulative incidence of elective termination of pregnancy over women never exposed before, but there is no evidence of a significantly increased risk or cumulative incidence in exposed women for SABs. This supports previous results on the same data, which were driven from an analysis without landmarking methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左截断竞争风险数据的标记法
在计算动态预测时,地标法是复杂多态模型的替代方法。我们从妊娠期药物安全评估的应用背景出发,针对左截断和竞争风险的情况提出了地标概念。我们通过柏林德国胚胎毒素药物警戒研究所的一项队列研究来说明这种方法,以评估接触过氟喹诺酮的妇女是否会增加自发性流产(SAB)等不良妊娠结局的风险或累积发生率。此外,我们还进行了一项广泛的模拟研究,将地标法获得的动态预测和系数估计值与非参数多态模型和经典的时间依赖协变量 Cox 回归的预测和系数估计值进行比较。模拟研究的结果表明,在本文所考虑的复杂环境中,地标估计值中也存在效应衰减,但估计值仍接近多态模型的估计值。关于柏林氟喹诺酮类药物的数据,与从未接触过氟喹诺酮类药物的妇女相比,孕妇在妊娠头三个月接触氟喹诺酮类药物似乎会增加其选择性终止妊娠的累积发生率,但没有证据表明接触过 SABs 的妇女的风险或累积发生率会显著增加。这支持了以前对相同数据的分析结果,这些结果是在没有采用标志性方法的情况下得出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
期刊最新文献
A Preplanned Multi-Stage Platform Trial for Discovering Multiple Superior Treatments With Control of FWER and Power. Developing and Comparing Four Families of Bayesian Network Autocorrelation Models for Binary Outcomes: Estimating Peer Effects Involving Adoption of Medical Technologies. Sensitivity Analysis for Effects of Multiple Exposures in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding. Quantification of Difference in Nonselectivity Between In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices. Multiple Contrast Tests in the Presence of Partial Heteroskedasticity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1