Landmarking for Left-Truncated Competing Risk Data

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1002/bimj.202400083
Theresa Unseld, Tobias Bluhmki, Jan Beyersmann, Evelin Beck, Stephanie Padberg, Regina Stegherr
{"title":"Landmarking for Left-Truncated Competing Risk Data","authors":"Theresa Unseld,&nbsp;Tobias Bluhmki,&nbsp;Jan Beyersmann,&nbsp;Evelin Beck,&nbsp;Stephanie Padberg,&nbsp;Regina Stegherr","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202400083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Landmarking is an alternative to complex multistate models when the aim is to calculate dynamic predictions. We develop the concept of landmarking for the case of left truncation and competing risks from the application background of drug safety assessment in pregnancy. The method is illustrated with a cohort study of the German Embryotox Pharmacovigilance Institute in Berlin to assess if the risk or the cumulative incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, like spontaneous abortions (SABs), is increased in fluoroquinolone-exposed women. Furthermore, we conduct an extensive simulation study to compare the dynamic predictions and coefficient estimates obtained by landmarking to those from nonparametric multistate models and classical time-dependent covariate Cox regression. The results from the simulation study indicate that attenuation of the effects is present in the landmark estimates, also in the complex setting considered here, but the estimates are still close to those from the multistate models. Regarding the Berlin fluoroquinolone data, the fluoroquinolone exposure of a pregnant woman in the first trimester seems to increase her cumulative incidence of elective termination of pregnancy over women never exposed before, but there is no evidence of a significantly increased risk or cumulative incidence in exposed women for SABs. This supports previous results on the same data, which were driven from an analysis without landmarking methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bimj.202400083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202400083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landmarking is an alternative to complex multistate models when the aim is to calculate dynamic predictions. We develop the concept of landmarking for the case of left truncation and competing risks from the application background of drug safety assessment in pregnancy. The method is illustrated with a cohort study of the German Embryotox Pharmacovigilance Institute in Berlin to assess if the risk or the cumulative incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, like spontaneous abortions (SABs), is increased in fluoroquinolone-exposed women. Furthermore, we conduct an extensive simulation study to compare the dynamic predictions and coefficient estimates obtained by landmarking to those from nonparametric multistate models and classical time-dependent covariate Cox regression. The results from the simulation study indicate that attenuation of the effects is present in the landmark estimates, also in the complex setting considered here, but the estimates are still close to those from the multistate models. Regarding the Berlin fluoroquinolone data, the fluoroquinolone exposure of a pregnant woman in the first trimester seems to increase her cumulative incidence of elective termination of pregnancy over women never exposed before, but there is no evidence of a significantly increased risk or cumulative incidence in exposed women for SABs. This supports previous results on the same data, which were driven from an analysis without landmarking methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左截断竞争风险数据的标记法
在计算动态预测时,地标法是复杂多态模型的替代方法。我们从妊娠期药物安全评估的应用背景出发,针对左截断和竞争风险的情况提出了地标概念。我们通过柏林德国胚胎毒素药物警戒研究所的一项队列研究来说明这种方法,以评估接触过氟喹诺酮的妇女是否会增加自发性流产(SAB)等不良妊娠结局的风险或累积发生率。此外,我们还进行了一项广泛的模拟研究,将地标法获得的动态预测和系数估计值与非参数多态模型和经典的时间依赖协变量 Cox 回归的预测和系数估计值进行比较。模拟研究的结果表明,在本文所考虑的复杂环境中,地标估计值中也存在效应衰减,但估计值仍接近多态模型的估计值。关于柏林氟喹诺酮类药物的数据,与从未接触过氟喹诺酮类药物的妇女相比,孕妇在妊娠头三个月接触氟喹诺酮类药物似乎会增加其选择性终止妊娠的累积发生率,但没有证据表明接触过 SABs 的妇女的风险或累积发生率会显著增加。这支持了以前对相同数据的分析结果,这些结果是在没有采用标志性方法的情况下得出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1