Recommendations for implementing digital alcohol interventions in primary care: lessons learned from a Norwegian feasibility study.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1343568
Sebastian Potthoff, Håvar Brendryen, Haris Bosnic, Anne Lill Mjølhus Njå, Tracy Finch, Torgeir Gilje Lid
{"title":"Recommendations for implementing digital alcohol interventions in primary care: lessons learned from a Norwegian feasibility study.","authors":"Sebastian Potthoff, Håvar Brendryen, Haris Bosnic, Anne Lill Mjølhus Njå, Tracy Finch, Torgeir Gilje Lid","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1343568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excessive alcohol consumption is a leading global risk factor for ill-health and premature death. Digital alcohol interventions can be effective at reducing alcohol consumption, but their widespread adoption is lagging behind. This study aimed to identify factors promoting or inhibiting the implementation of a digital alcohol intervention in Norwegian primary care, by using Normalization Process Theory (NPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods feasibility study combining quantitative and qualitative methods. A digital alcohol intervention called \"Endre\" was implemented across four GP practices in Stavanger and Oslo. Usage of the intervention was logged on the digital platform. General practitioners (GPs) reported their perceived uptake of the intervention via a web-based survey. The Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) survey was used to measure support staff's perceived normalization of the intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed using the NPT framework, with quantitative data analyzed descriptively and using <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for differences in current and future normalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven GPs worked in the clinics and could recruit patients for the digital intervention. Thirty-six patients registered for the intervention. Nine patients dropped out early and 25 completed the intervention as intended. Low normalization scores at follow-up (<i>n</i> = 27) indicated that Endre did not become fully embedded in and across practices. Nonetheless, staff felt somewhat confident about their use of Endre and thought it may become a more integral part of their work in the future. Findings from six semi-structured group interviews suggested that limited implementation success may have been due to a lack of tailored implementation support, staff's lack of involvement, their diminished trust in Endre, and a lack of feedback on intervention usage. The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic further limited opportunities for GPs to use Endre.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study investigated the real-world challenges of implementing a digital alcohol intervention in routine clinical practice. Future research should involve support staff in both the development and implementation of digital solutions to maximize compatibility with professional workflows and needs. Integration of digital solutions may further be improved by including features such as dashboards that enable clinicians to access and monitor patient progress and self-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1343568"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1343568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Excessive alcohol consumption is a leading global risk factor for ill-health and premature death. Digital alcohol interventions can be effective at reducing alcohol consumption, but their widespread adoption is lagging behind. This study aimed to identify factors promoting or inhibiting the implementation of a digital alcohol intervention in Norwegian primary care, by using Normalization Process Theory (NPT).

Methods: A mixed methods feasibility study combining quantitative and qualitative methods. A digital alcohol intervention called "Endre" was implemented across four GP practices in Stavanger and Oslo. Usage of the intervention was logged on the digital platform. General practitioners (GPs) reported their perceived uptake of the intervention via a web-based survey. The Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) survey was used to measure support staff's perceived normalization of the intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed using the NPT framework, with quantitative data analyzed descriptively and using χ 2 and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for differences in current and future normalization.

Results: Thirty-seven GPs worked in the clinics and could recruit patients for the digital intervention. Thirty-six patients registered for the intervention. Nine patients dropped out early and 25 completed the intervention as intended. Low normalization scores at follow-up (n = 27) indicated that Endre did not become fully embedded in and across practices. Nonetheless, staff felt somewhat confident about their use of Endre and thought it may become a more integral part of their work in the future. Findings from six semi-structured group interviews suggested that limited implementation success may have been due to a lack of tailored implementation support, staff's lack of involvement, their diminished trust in Endre, and a lack of feedback on intervention usage. The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic further limited opportunities for GPs to use Endre.

Conclusion: This study investigated the real-world challenges of implementing a digital alcohol intervention in routine clinical practice. Future research should involve support staff in both the development and implementation of digital solutions to maximize compatibility with professional workflows and needs. Integration of digital solutions may further be improved by including features such as dashboards that enable clinicians to access and monitor patient progress and self-reported outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健中实施数字酒精干预的建议:从挪威可行性研究中汲取的经验教训。
导言:过度饮酒是导致健康不良和过早死亡的全球主要风险因素。数字酒精干预措施可以有效减少酒精消费,但其广泛采用却相对滞后。本研究旨在利用规范化过程理论(NPT),确定促进或抑制在挪威初级保健中实施数字酒精干预的因素:方法:采用定量和定性相结合的混合方法进行可行性研究。在斯塔万格和奥斯陆的四家全科医生诊所实施了名为 "Endre "的数字酒精干预措施。干预措施的使用情况记录在数字平台上。全科医生(GPs)通过网络调查报告了他们对干预措施的接受程度。规范化保证发展(NoMAD)调查用于衡量辅助人员对干预措施的规范化感知。采用 NPT 框架对定性数据进行分析,对定量数据进行描述性分析,并采用 χ 2 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验对当前和未来正常化的差异进行检验:结果:37 名全科医生在诊所工作,可以为数字干预招募患者。36名患者登记参加干预。9名患者提前退出,25名患者按计划完成了干预。随访时的正常化得分较低(n = 27),这表明 Endre 并未完全融入诊所内部和诊所之间。尽管如此,员工们还是对使用 Endre 有了一定的信心,并认为 Endre 今后可能会成为他们工作中更加不可或缺的一部分。六次半结构化小组访谈的结果表明,由于缺乏量身定制的实施支持、员工缺乏参与、对 Endre 的信任度降低以及缺乏对干预使用情况的反馈,实施的成功率有限。Covid-19大流行的爆发进一步限制了全科医生使用Endre的机会:本研究调查了在常规临床实践中实施数字酒精干预所面临的现实挑战。未来的研究应让辅助人员参与数字解决方案的开发和实施,以最大限度地满足专业工作流程和需求。通过加入仪表板等功能,使临床医生能够访问和监控患者的进展情况和自我报告的结果,可以进一步改进数字解决方案的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1