{"title":"Compatibility of the global lung function 2012 spirometry reference values in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.","authors":"Bruna Weber Santos, Janaina Cristina Scalco, Paloma Lopes Francisco Parazzi, Camila Isabel Santos Schivinski","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2024.2421849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI 2012) has published multiethnic spirometry reference values. To identify studies that evaluated the compatibility (applicability, validity, representativeness, agreement and/or adequacy) of the reference equations proposed by the GLI 2012 for spirometry tests in different populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were carried out on the PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Cross-sectional observational studies published between 2012 and 2013 onwards that evaluated the compatibility of the GLI 2012 in children, adolescents and young adults (3-20 years old) were included. The references were manually searched and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross-Sectional Analytical Studies was applied to assess the methodological quality of the studies included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the 5632 studies identified were classified as low risk of bias, but only 21 were deemed eligible for inclusion. Of these, 8 reported satisfactory GLI 2012 compatibility for their populations (Argentina, Spain, Columbia, Djibouti, Norway, Poland, Jordan and Zimbabwe), 5 cautious applicability, and the remaining 8 considered the equation unsatisfactory, since it over or underestimated spirometric parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GLI 2012 equations are not applicable to all populations and must be tested before being adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2421849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI 2012) has published multiethnic spirometry reference values. To identify studies that evaluated the compatibility (applicability, validity, representativeness, agreement and/or adequacy) of the reference equations proposed by the GLI 2012 for spirometry tests in different populations.
Methods: Systematic searches were carried out on the PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Cross-sectional observational studies published between 2012 and 2013 onwards that evaluated the compatibility of the GLI 2012 in children, adolescents and young adults (3-20 years old) were included. The references were manually searched and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross-Sectional Analytical Studies was applied to assess the methodological quality of the studies included.
Results: All of the 5632 studies identified were classified as low risk of bias, but only 21 were deemed eligible for inclusion. Of these, 8 reported satisfactory GLI 2012 compatibility for their populations (Argentina, Spain, Columbia, Djibouti, Norway, Poland, Jordan and Zimbabwe), 5 cautious applicability, and the remaining 8 considered the equation unsatisfactory, since it over or underestimated spirometric parameters.
Conclusion: The GLI 2012 equations are not applicable to all populations and must be tested before being adopted.