Are early career researchers feeling the consequences of the COVID pandemic?

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/leap.1629
David Nicholas, Abdullah Abrizah, Jorge Revez, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, Marzena Swigon, David Clark, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Eti Herman
{"title":"Are early career researchers feeling the consequences of the COVID pandemic?","authors":"David Nicholas,&nbsp;Abdullah Abrizah,&nbsp;Jorge Revez,&nbsp;Blanca Rodríguez Bravo,&nbsp;Marzena Swigon,&nbsp;David Clark,&nbsp;Jie Xu,&nbsp;Anthony Watkinson,&nbsp;Eti Herman","doi":"10.1002/leap.1629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the COVID pandemic, some commentators thought that early career researchers (ECRs) would become a ‘lost generation’. Yet the Harbingers (H-2) longitudinal study, which followed ECRs for 2 years during the pandemic found that ECRs took things in their stride. More than 2 years on, we returned, as part of the AI stage of the Harbingers study (H-3), to see what has transpired and interviewed nearly 70 ECRs from six countries as part of an exploratory study. We found that: (1) only one in six ECRS thought they were suffering from the residual impacts of the pandemic, with increased workload creating the greatest stress; (2) working remotely, digitally and more flexibly was thought by many to be the biggest dividend delivered, making the job more desirable and competitive; (3) an apparent growth in jobs and promotions (tenures) confirmed the bounce-back. Given the modest size of the study, analysis by country has to be undertaken with caution, but China, where political and economic factors have stifled any bounce-back, stands out for special attention in a future full-blown study. Finally, the study yielded informed and considered views that the long-term impact of the pandemic appears to be beneficial rather than disadvantageous.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1629","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID pandemic, some commentators thought that early career researchers (ECRs) would become a ‘lost generation’. Yet the Harbingers (H-2) longitudinal study, which followed ECRs for 2 years during the pandemic found that ECRs took things in their stride. More than 2 years on, we returned, as part of the AI stage of the Harbingers study (H-3), to see what has transpired and interviewed nearly 70 ECRs from six countries as part of an exploratory study. We found that: (1) only one in six ECRS thought they were suffering from the residual impacts of the pandemic, with increased workload creating the greatest stress; (2) working remotely, digitally and more flexibly was thought by many to be the biggest dividend delivered, making the job more desirable and competitive; (3) an apparent growth in jobs and promotions (tenures) confirmed the bounce-back. Given the modest size of the study, analysis by country has to be undertaken with caution, but China, where political and economic factors have stifled any bounce-back, stands out for special attention in a future full-blown study. Finally, the study yielded informed and considered views that the long-term impact of the pandemic appears to be beneficial rather than disadvantageous.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期职业研究人员是否感受到了 COVID 大流行的后果?
在 COVID 大流行期间,一些评论家认为早期职业研究人员(ECR)将成为 "失落的一代"。然而,"Harbingers(H-2)"纵向研究在大流行期间对 ECR 进行了为期 2 年的跟踪调查,结果发现 ECR 能够从容应对。2 年多后,作为 Harbingers 研究(H-3)人工智能阶段的一部分,我们重返现场,了解情况,并采访了来自 6 个国家的近 70 名 ECR,作为探索性研究的一部分。我们发现(1) 只有六分之一的 ECRS 认为他们受到了大流行病的残余影响,工作量的增加给他们带来了最大的压力;(2) 许多人认为远程、数字化和更灵活的工作方式是最大的红利,它使工作更受欢迎,更具竞争力;(3) 工作和晋升(任期)的明显增长证实了反弹。鉴于研究的规模不大,按国家进行分析必须谨慎,但中国的政治和经济因素抑制了任何反弹,因此在未来的全面研究中需要特别关注。最后,这项研究得出了知情和深思熟虑的观点,即大流行病的长期影响似乎是有利而非不利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus-Indexed Journals Questioning the Predator of the Predatory Journals: How Fair Are Global Publishing Standards? Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI “I Really Try to Model Good Practices”: Reflecting on Journal Article Publication From Mid-Career The Impact of Print-on-Demand on Spanish University Presses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1