The Love Jones Cohort and singlehood are family law issues

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1111/fcre.12817
Kimberly Martinez Phillips, Kris Marsh
{"title":"The Love Jones Cohort and singlehood are family law issues","authors":"Kimberly Martinez Phillips,&nbsp;Kris Marsh","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article reviews the changing Black family and households. The core theme is to understand the uniqueness of those single and living alone in the Black middle class—the “Love Jones Cohort”—and how their intersecting identities of race, class, gender, and singleness inform their lifestyle, shape how they manage life decisions, and their relationship to policy as well as family law and family court. This essay moves beyond the popularized and omnipresent inquiry: “Why are Black women <i>not</i> getting married?” or “Why are there so many single professional Black women?” This line of questioning throws the spotlight squarely on Black women's individual dating practices, while often ignoring structural factors that undergird those decision-making processes. It implies that because of the individual actions of the Love Jones Cohort, specifically Black women, they are somehow at a deficiency if they are not married and child-free, rendering them invisible as a family. This article discusses the legal implications of the presence of the Love Jones Cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 4","pages":"900-919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviews the changing Black family and households. The core theme is to understand the uniqueness of those single and living alone in the Black middle class—the “Love Jones Cohort”—and how their intersecting identities of race, class, gender, and singleness inform their lifestyle, shape how they manage life decisions, and their relationship to policy as well as family law and family court. This essay moves beyond the popularized and omnipresent inquiry: “Why are Black women not getting married?” or “Why are there so many single professional Black women?” This line of questioning throws the spotlight squarely on Black women's individual dating practices, while often ignoring structural factors that undergird those decision-making processes. It implies that because of the individual actions of the Love Jones Cohort, specifically Black women, they are somehow at a deficiency if they are not married and child-free, rendering them invisible as a family. This article discusses the legal implications of the presence of the Love Jones Cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱情琼斯群和单身是家庭法问题
本文回顾了不断变化的黑人家庭和住户。核心主题是了解黑人中产阶级中单身独居者--"爱-琼斯群体"--的独特性,以及他们的种族、阶级、性别和单身等交叉身份如何影响他们的生活方式,塑造他们如何管理生活决策,以及他们与政策、家庭法和家事法庭的关系。这篇文章超越了大众化的、无处不在的探究:"为什么黑人女性不结婚?"或 "为什么有这么多单身的职业黑人女性?这种提问方式将焦点集中在黑人女性的个人约会行为上,却往往忽视了支撑这些决策过程的结构性因素。它暗示,由于 "爱-琼斯群"(尤其是黑人女性)的个人行为,她们如果不结婚、不生子,就会在某种程度上处于劣势,从而使她们成为家庭的隐形人。本文讨论了 "爱-琼斯群体 "存在的法律意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A call to action: Every family deserves active efforts. Keeping the black family together-active efforts as the standard for all removal and reunification efforts Cheating the evidence to get to best interest and the presumption of unfitness Lies my child welfare system has told me: The critical importance of centering families' voices in family policing legal advocacy Unbundling marriage law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1