Uncovering the Dynamic Drivers of Floods Through Interpretable Deep Learning

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1029/2024EF004751
Yuanhao Xu, Kairong Lin, Caihong Hu, Xiaohong Chen, Jingwen Zhang, Mingzhong Xiao, Chong-Yu Xu
{"title":"Uncovering the Dynamic Drivers of Floods Through Interpretable Deep Learning","authors":"Yuanhao Xu,&nbsp;Kairong Lin,&nbsp;Caihong Hu,&nbsp;Xiaohong Chen,&nbsp;Jingwen Zhang,&nbsp;Mingzhong Xiao,&nbsp;Chong-Yu Xu","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The formation of floods, as a complex physical process, exhibits dynamic changes in its driving factors over time and space under climate change. Due to the black-box nature of deep learning, its use alone does not enhance understanding of hydrological processes. The challenge lies in employing deep learning to uncover new knowledge on flood formation mechanism. This study proposes an interpretable framework for deep learning flood modeling that employs interpretability techniques to elucidate the inner workings of a peak-sensitive Informer, revealing the dynamic response of floods to driving factors in 482 watersheds across the United States. Accurate simulation is a prerequisite for interpretability techniques to provide reliable information. The study reveals that comparing the Informer with Transformer and LSTM, the former showed superior performance in peak flood simulation (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency over 0.6 in 70% of watersheds). By interpreting Informer's decision-making process, three primary flood-inducing patterns were identified: Precipitation, excess soil water, and snowmelt. The controlling effect of dominant factors is regional, and their impact on floods in time steps shows significant differences, challenging the traditional understanding that variables closer to the timing of flood event occurrence have a greater impact. Over 40% of watersheds exhibited shifts in dominant driving factors between 1981 and 2020, with precipitation-dominated watersheds undergoing more significant changes, corroborating climate change responses. Additionally, the study unveils the interplay and dynamic shifts among variables. These findings suggest that interpretable deep learning, through reverse deduction, transforms data-driven models from merely fitting nonlinear relationships to effective tools for enhancing understanding of hydrological characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004751","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004751","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The formation of floods, as a complex physical process, exhibits dynamic changes in its driving factors over time and space under climate change. Due to the black-box nature of deep learning, its use alone does not enhance understanding of hydrological processes. The challenge lies in employing deep learning to uncover new knowledge on flood formation mechanism. This study proposes an interpretable framework for deep learning flood modeling that employs interpretability techniques to elucidate the inner workings of a peak-sensitive Informer, revealing the dynamic response of floods to driving factors in 482 watersheds across the United States. Accurate simulation is a prerequisite for interpretability techniques to provide reliable information. The study reveals that comparing the Informer with Transformer and LSTM, the former showed superior performance in peak flood simulation (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency over 0.6 in 70% of watersheds). By interpreting Informer's decision-making process, three primary flood-inducing patterns were identified: Precipitation, excess soil water, and snowmelt. The controlling effect of dominant factors is regional, and their impact on floods in time steps shows significant differences, challenging the traditional understanding that variables closer to the timing of flood event occurrence have a greater impact. Over 40% of watersheds exhibited shifts in dominant driving factors between 1981 and 2020, with precipitation-dominated watersheds undergoing more significant changes, corroborating climate change responses. Additionally, the study unveils the interplay and dynamic shifts among variables. These findings suggest that interpretable deep learning, through reverse deduction, transforms data-driven models from merely fitting nonlinear relationships to effective tools for enhancing understanding of hydrological characteristics.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过可解释的深度学习揭示洪水的动态驱动因素
洪水的形成是一个复杂的物理过程,在气候变化的影响下,其驱动因素会随时间和空间发生动态变化。由于深度学习的黑箱性质,仅使用深度学习并不能加深对水文过程的理解。如何利用深度学习挖掘洪水形成机制的新知识是一个挑战。本研究提出了一个可解释的深度学习洪水建模框架,利用可解释性技术阐明了峰值敏感信息器的内部工作原理,揭示了全美 482 个流域的洪水对驱动因素的动态响应。准确的模拟是可解释性技术提供可靠信息的前提。研究表明,将 Informer 与 Transformer 和 LSTM 相比,前者在洪峰模拟中表现出更优越的性能(在 70% 的流域中,Nash-Sutcliffe 效率超过 0.6)。通过解释 Informer 的决策过程,确定了三种主要的洪水诱发模式:降水、过量土壤水和融雪。主导因素的控制效应是区域性的,它们对洪水的影响在时间步长上显示出显著差异,这挑战了传统的认识,即更接近洪水事件发生时间的变量影响更大。在 1981 年至 2020 年期间,超过 40% 的流域的主导驱动因素发生了变化,以降水为主的流域发生的变化更为显著,证实了气候变化的响应。此外,该研究还揭示了变量之间的相互作用和动态变化。这些发现表明,可解释的深度学习通过反向推导,将数据驱动模型从仅仅拟合非线性关系转变为增强对水文特征理解的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
期刊最新文献
Effective Adaptation Options to Alleviate Nuisance Flooding in Coastal Megacities—Learning From Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Observations Over a Century Underscore an Increasing Likelihood of Compound Dry-Hot Events in China Response of Global Runoff Components to Rising CO2 Increased Asian Sulfate Aerosol Emissions Remarkably Enhance Sahel Summer Precipitation Consumption-Based Emissions of African Countries: An Analysis of Decoupling Dynamics and Drivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1