A Comprehensive Analysis of Apricot Drying Methods via Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Food Process Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1111/jfpe.14759
Aslı Abdulvahitoglu, Adnan Abdulvahitoglu, Nurten Cengiz
{"title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Apricot Drying Methods via Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques","authors":"Aslı Abdulvahitoglu,&nbsp;Adnan Abdulvahitoglu,&nbsp;Nurten Cengiz","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.14759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food and food safety have been among the most important issues for people throughout history. Societies have always tried to be self-sufficient in food and have avoided becoming dependent on foreign sources. However, the fact that most foods are seasonal and the increasing population's food consumption have revealed the need to preserve foodstuffs for a long time. The old and well-known method used today for extending shelf life is the drying process. The drying process is preferred over other preservation methods for reasons such as being more economical, easier to transport, having a longer shelf life, more concentrated nutritional value, and containing fewer additives. This ensures that dried foods are of higher quality in terms of physical, chemical, microbial properties, and nutritional values compared to other packaged foods. While the drying process was traditionally done over a long period, technological advancements have led to the production of higher quality and more valuable commercial products in a shorter time. In this study, traditional and technological methods used in drying apricots were compared according to the parameters determined by experts in the field. Since multiple parameters are effective in the comparison, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques were used. The optimum apricot drying method was determined by combining the results obtained from different MCDM techniques with the Borda rule.</p>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"47 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfpe.14759","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.14759","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food and food safety have been among the most important issues for people throughout history. Societies have always tried to be self-sufficient in food and have avoided becoming dependent on foreign sources. However, the fact that most foods are seasonal and the increasing population's food consumption have revealed the need to preserve foodstuffs for a long time. The old and well-known method used today for extending shelf life is the drying process. The drying process is preferred over other preservation methods for reasons such as being more economical, easier to transport, having a longer shelf life, more concentrated nutritional value, and containing fewer additives. This ensures that dried foods are of higher quality in terms of physical, chemical, microbial properties, and nutritional values compared to other packaged foods. While the drying process was traditionally done over a long period, technological advancements have led to the production of higher quality and more valuable commercial products in a shorter time. In this study, traditional and technological methods used in drying apricots were compared according to the parameters determined by experts in the field. Since multiple parameters are effective in the comparison, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques were used. The optimum apricot drying method was determined by combining the results obtained from different MCDM techniques with the Borda rule.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多标准决策技术全面分析杏子干燥方法
古往今来,食品和食品安全一直是人们最关心的问题之一。社会一直努力实现粮食自给自足,避免依赖外国来源。然而,由于大多数食物都是季节性的,而且人口的食物消费量不断增加,因此需要长期保存食品。如今用于延长保质期的古老而著名的方法是干燥工艺。与其他保存方法相比,干燥法更经济、更易于运输、保质期更长、营养价值更集中、添加剂含量更少。这就确保了与其他包装食品相比,干燥食品在物理、化学、微生物特性和营养价值方面具有更高的质量。虽然传统的干燥过程需要很长时间,但技术的进步使人们可以在更短的时间内生产出质量更高、价值更高的商业产品。在这项研究中,根据该领域专家确定的参数,对用于干燥杏的传统方法和技术方法进行了比较。由于多个参数在比较中都很有效,因此采用了多标准决策 (MCDM) 技术。通过将不同 MCDM 技术得出的结果与 Borda 规则相结合,确定了最佳杏子干燥方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
期刊最新文献
Cost Estimation for the Preservation of Selected Food/Crop Products With Ozone Application of Computational Intelligence to Determine the Effect of Different Shear Bar Positions on Chopping Length and Specific Cutting Energy Consumption in the Chopping of Silage Sorghum Modelling and Optimizing the Integrity of an Automated Vegetable Leaf Packaging Machine Diagnosing Fungal Infection in Wheat Kernels by Integrating Spectroscopic Technology and Digital Color Imaging System: Artificial Neural Network, Principal Component Analysis and Correlation Feature Selection Techniques Investigation of Cross-Sectional Characteristics of Internal Meshing Screw Mixing Flow Field for Dough Paste
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1