Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of a Chinese Version Questionnaire for Measuring Emergency Nursing Interruptions

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1155/2024/8750135
Tao Lin, Xianqiong Feng, Yongli Gao
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of a Chinese Version Questionnaire for Measuring Emergency Nursing Interruptions","authors":"Tao Lin,&nbsp;Xianqiong Feng,&nbsp;Yongli Gao","doi":"10.1155/2024/8750135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Nursing interruptions occur frequently and often have adverse outcomes, threatening patient safety. Emergency departments have a high incidence of nursing interruptions owing to the concentration of critically ill patients and frequent emergencies. Current research mainly focuses on large hospitals and uses observation and interview methods. Therefore, there is a need to develop tools for measuring emergency nursing interruptions. This study develops a survey questionnaire on emergency nursing interruptions. It tests its validity and reliability by building on the conceptual framework of emergency nursing interruption proposed in the literature. Specifically, we develop a test version of the emergency nursing interruption survey questionnaire using a Delphi expert inquiry and preinvestigation. We selected 1047 emergency nurses in 22 provinces and autonomous regions of China to participate in the survey by completing the questionnaire between June and July 2023 to evaluate the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The final questionnaire comprised 26 items across 5 dimensions—sources, types, interrupted nursing activities, consequences of interrupted nursing activities, and management of nursing interruptions. The content validity indexes were 0.948 at scale level and 0.842–1.000 at item level. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to extract five common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 66.550%. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated a good model fit. Cronbach’s <i>α</i> coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.912, split-half reliability was 0.846, and the retest reliability calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.915. To ensure the structural validity of the scales, EFA and CFA were conducted using two different datasets. Thus, the questionnaire showed good validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate how nurses understand emergency nursing interruptions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8750135","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8750135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing interruptions occur frequently and often have adverse outcomes, threatening patient safety. Emergency departments have a high incidence of nursing interruptions owing to the concentration of critically ill patients and frequent emergencies. Current research mainly focuses on large hospitals and uses observation and interview methods. Therefore, there is a need to develop tools for measuring emergency nursing interruptions. This study develops a survey questionnaire on emergency nursing interruptions. It tests its validity and reliability by building on the conceptual framework of emergency nursing interruption proposed in the literature. Specifically, we develop a test version of the emergency nursing interruption survey questionnaire using a Delphi expert inquiry and preinvestigation. We selected 1047 emergency nurses in 22 provinces and autonomous regions of China to participate in the survey by completing the questionnaire between June and July 2023 to evaluate the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The final questionnaire comprised 26 items across 5 dimensions—sources, types, interrupted nursing activities, consequences of interrupted nursing activities, and management of nursing interruptions. The content validity indexes were 0.948 at scale level and 0.842–1.000 at item level. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to extract five common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 66.550%. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated a good model fit. Cronbach’s α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.912, split-half reliability was 0.846, and the retest reliability calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.915. To ensure the structural validity of the scales, EFA and CFA were conducted using two different datasets. Thus, the questionnaire showed good validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate how nurses understand emergency nursing interruptions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于测量紧急护理中断的中文版问卷的开发与心理测量学特性评估
护理中断经常发生,而且往往造成不良后果,威胁患者安全。急诊科由于危重病人集中、紧急情况频繁,护理中断发生率较高。目前的研究主要集中在大型医院,并采用观察和访谈的方法。因此,有必要开发测量急诊护理中断的工具。本研究编制了一份关于急诊护理中断的调查问卷。它以文献中提出的急诊护理中断概念框架为基础,检验了问卷的有效性和可靠性。具体而言,我们采用德尔菲专家询问和预调查的方法,开发了急诊护理中断调查问卷的测试版本。在 2023 年 6 月至 7 月期间,我们在全国 22 个省市自治区选取了 1047 名急诊护士参与问卷调查,对问卷的效度和信度进行了评估。最终问卷包括5个维度的26个条目--来源、类型、护理活动中断、护理活动中断的后果和护理中断的管理。量表的内容效度指数为 0.948,项目的内容效度指数为 0.842-1.000。我们采用探索性因子分析(EFA)提取了 5 个共同因子,累计方差贡献率为 66.550%。确认性因子分析(CFA)的结果表明模型拟合良好。问卷的 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.912,分半信度为 0.846,使用类内相关系数计算的重测信度为 0.915。为确保量表的结构效度,使用两个不同的数据集进行了 EFA 和 CFA 检验。因此,该问卷具有良好的效度和信度,可用于评估护士对紧急护理中断的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
Effects of Hierarchical Unit Culture and Power Distance Orientation on Nurses’ Silence Behavior: The Roles of Perceived Futility and Hospital Management Support for Patient Safety Nurse-Led Telephone Program for Nonadherent to Treatment Type 2 Diabetics With Comorbid Depression: A Cost-Consequence and Budget Impact Analysis Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Organizational Learning Instrument–Development Stages (OLI-DS) Instrument in Hospital Units A Salutogenic Perspective on Critical Care Nurse’s Experiences of Supervising Nurses Without Training in Intensive Care to Comprehend, Manage, and Feel Meaning During a Crisis The Impact of Perceived Emotional Intelligence on Occupational Stress Among Nurses: Empirical Evidence From a Saudi Health Cluster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1