Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70155
Sophie L. Russell, Mushidur Rahman, Charles J. Steward, Amy E. Harwood, Gordon McGregor, Prithwish Banerjee, Nduka C. Okwose, Djordje G. Jakovljevic
{"title":"Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function","authors":"Sophie L. Russell,&nbsp;Mushidur Rahman,&nbsp;Charles J. Steward,&nbsp;Amy E. Harwood,&nbsp;Gordon McGregor,&nbsp;Prithwish Banerjee,&nbsp;Nduka C. Okwose,&nbsp;Djordje G. Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> in healthy individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms<sup>−1</sup> and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al x $x$ ) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al x $x$ in healthy individuals.

Methods

Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al x $x$ assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al x $x$ was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.

Results

The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al x $x$ were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms−1 and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al x $x$ showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, p < 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, p < 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, p ≤ 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

PWV and Al x $x$ demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中心脉搏波速度和增强指数是动脉功能的重复性和再现性测量指标
背景和目的 动脉功能(特别是动脉僵化)是一个重要的心血管风险因素。脉搏波速度(PWV)和增强指数(Al x $x$)是动脉功能的既定指标。本研究旨在评估健康人脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 的重复性和再现性。 方法 40 名健康参与者(年龄 33 ± 11 岁,17 名女性)接受静息仰卧脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 评估。测量结果一式三份,间隔一周重复一次。Al x $x$ 是通过肱动脉闭塞测量的,脉搏波速度是通过眼压计-颤动测量法从颈动脉到股动脉测量的。重复性和再现性采用类内相关系数(ICC)进行评估。对 10 名参与者进行了操作员之间的再现性评估。 结果 PWV 和 Al x $x$ 的周间平均值分别为 6.20 ± 0.91 对 6.13 ± 0.91 ms-1 和 14.0 ± 11.8 对 16.3 ± 12.2%。对于当天的测量,脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 都显示出极好的重复性(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.96,95% CI:0.92-0.98,p < 0.01;Al x $x$ :ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94, p < 0.01)和操作者之间的再现性(PWV:ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69-0.98, p < 0.01)。间隔 1 周重复测量,结果显示重现性良好(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.77,95% CI:0.61-0.87,p ≤ 0.01;Al x x $x$ : ICC = 0.73,95% CI:0.73-0.86,p < 0.01)。 结论脉搏波速度和 Al x x$x$ 显示出极好的重复性和再现性。考虑到这些变量均为无创且易于测量,动脉功能评估可在常规临床实践中发挥作用,促进心血管疾病的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Cryotherapy and Electrosurgery in the Treatment of Sebaceous Hyperplasia, Seborrheic Keratosis, Cherry Angioma, and Skin Tag: A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Study. The Association of Nasal and Blood Eosinophils with Serum IgE Level in Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma: A Case-Control Study. Unacceptable Behaviors Towards Health Professional Clinical Students: Protocol For a Mixed-Methods Study. Workup of Parkinson's Disease, Parkinson Plus, Lewy Body, and Alzheimer's Dementia Should Include SPECT, PET and Genetics. Does preprocedural ultrasound prior to lumbar neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia increase first-pass success in adults with obesity? A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1