Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70155
Sophie L. Russell, Mushidur Rahman, Charles J. Steward, Amy E. Harwood, Gordon McGregor, Prithwish Banerjee, Nduka C. Okwose, Djordje G. Jakovljevic
{"title":"Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function","authors":"Sophie L. Russell,&nbsp;Mushidur Rahman,&nbsp;Charles J. Steward,&nbsp;Amy E. Harwood,&nbsp;Gordon McGregor,&nbsp;Prithwish Banerjee,&nbsp;Nduka C. Okwose,&nbsp;Djordje G. Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> in healthy individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms<sup>−1</sup> and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al x $x$ ) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al x $x$ in healthy individuals.

Methods

Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al x $x$ assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al x $x$ was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.

Results

The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al x $x$ were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms−1 and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al x $x$ showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, p < 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, p < 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, p ≤ 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

PWV and Al x $x$ demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中心脉搏波速度和增强指数是动脉功能的重复性和再现性测量指标
背景和目的 动脉功能(特别是动脉僵化)是一个重要的心血管风险因素。脉搏波速度(PWV)和增强指数(Al x $x$)是动脉功能的既定指标。本研究旨在评估健康人脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 的重复性和再现性。 方法 40 名健康参与者(年龄 33 ± 11 岁,17 名女性)接受静息仰卧脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 评估。测量结果一式三份,间隔一周重复一次。Al x $x$ 是通过肱动脉闭塞测量的,脉搏波速度是通过眼压计-颤动测量法从颈动脉到股动脉测量的。重复性和再现性采用类内相关系数(ICC)进行评估。对 10 名参与者进行了操作员之间的再现性评估。 结果 PWV 和 Al x $x$ 的周间平均值分别为 6.20 ± 0.91 对 6.13 ± 0.91 ms-1 和 14.0 ± 11.8 对 16.3 ± 12.2%。对于当天的测量,脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 都显示出极好的重复性(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.96,95% CI:0.92-0.98,p < 0.01;Al x $x$ :ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94, p < 0.01)和操作者之间的再现性(PWV:ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69-0.98, p < 0.01)。间隔 1 周重复测量,结果显示重现性良好(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.77,95% CI:0.61-0.87,p ≤ 0.01;Al x x $x$ : ICC = 0.73,95% CI:0.73-0.86,p < 0.01)。 结论脉搏波速度和 Al x x$x$ 显示出极好的重复性和再现性。考虑到这些变量均为无创且易于测量,动脉功能评估可在常规临床实践中发挥作用,促进心血管疾病的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chronic Antibiotic Use, Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis, and Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer: An Emerging Threat Substance Use in Sports: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Professional Footballers in Accra, Ghana Healthcare Workers' Experiences With Hepatitis B Virus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Management at a Military Hospital in Ghana: A Qualitative Study Ondasetron as Premedication for Unsedated Upper Digestive Endoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Tolerance and Acceptability Indoor Air Pollution and Associated Factors of Acute Respiratory Infections Among Under-Five Children in East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1