PPP03 Presentation Time: 10:48 AM

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.095
Lucas C. Mendez MD, MSc , Matt Mulligan BSc , Douglas A. Hoover PhD , Samih Mohamed MD , Maria Thereza Starling MD , Aneesh Dhar MD , Rohann Correa MD, PhD , Vikram Velker MD , Joelle Helou MD , Glenn Bauman MD , Aaron Fenster PhD , Gary Brahm MD , David D'Souza MD , Jason Vickress PhD
{"title":"PPP03 Presentation Time: 10:48 AM","authors":"Lucas C. Mendez MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Matt Mulligan BSc ,&nbsp;Douglas A. Hoover PhD ,&nbsp;Samih Mohamed MD ,&nbsp;Maria Thereza Starling MD ,&nbsp;Aneesh Dhar MD ,&nbsp;Rohann Correa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vikram Velker MD ,&nbsp;Joelle Helou MD ,&nbsp;Glenn Bauman MD ,&nbsp;Aaron Fenster PhD ,&nbsp;Gary Brahm MD ,&nbsp;David D'Souza MD ,&nbsp;Jason Vickress PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Erectile disfunction (ED) is a common long-term side effect of any prostate cancer treatment. Radiation-related ED is thought to be a vascular process, related to venous occlusion caused by radiation. Low dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) is a well-established treatment modality that has an undisputable dose conformality and a theoretical advantage in reducing dose to erectile-related structures when compared to EBRT options. Nevertheless, the role of vessel-sparing LDR-BT technique has not been previously described.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>PRIAPUS (NCT 04718987) is a prospective, single-arm clinical trial evaluating feasibility and dosimetry associated with a novel LDR BT technique that aims to spare ED-related structures, including the prostatic neurovascular bundles (NVB) contralateral to the index lesion and the penile bulb (Figure 1). The trial planned to accrue 15 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer staged with MRI, with clinically significant disease (CSD) contained to one lobe of the prostate. Primary objective was for 70% of patients to achieve acceptable dose to the target structure while sufficiently sparing ED-related structures. Dosimetry was evaluated on a one-month post-implant CT-scan. In order of priority, the trial's dosimetric goals are: target D90% ≥ 140 Gy, urethra D30% &lt; 130%, contralateral NVB median dose ≤ 50 Gy, and penile bulb D10% ≤ 50 Gy. The LDR BT workflow involved a pre-procedural prostate mpMRI for NVB definition, intra-operative use of a deformable image registration algorithm to translate NVB contours from pre-implant MRI to the live ultrasound images, and intraoperative planning using loose 125-Iodine radioactive seeds with a prescription dose of 145 Gy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen patients have been consented: one withdrew consent before receiving treatment, one awaits treatment, and 13 have been successfully treated with post-implant dosimetry available for analysis. In the one-month post-procedure scan, the mean target D90% was 153 Gy (SD ± 10 Gy). All patients but one had a target D90% &gt; 140 Gy. The mean urethra D30% was 129% (SD ±10%). The mean contralateral NVB D50% was 60 Gy (SD ± 13 Gy), with 10 of 13 implants failing to meet the pre-specified goal. For comparison, the ipsilateral NVB which was not spared received a mean D50% of 131 Gy (SD ± 33 Gy). The mean penile bulb D10% was 32 Gy (SD ± 13 Gy). Only two patients had a post-implant dosimetry that met all pre-specified criteria, and so this trial's primary dosimetric endpoint will not be met after the last patient receives treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The pre-specified dosimetric goals were found stringent and seldom achievable and future trials with this technique will require relaxation of the contralateral NVB constraint. While the primary dosimetric endpoint was not met, a substantial dose sparing to the contralateral NVB was achieved while maintaining an ablative dose to the subtotal prostate. Figure 1- Mid-gland T2 axial sequence at 1-month post LDR BT implant in a patient with CSD located in the right lobe. Note dose avoidance to the contralateral neurovascular bundle (contoured in yellow). Prescription dose (in pink colour) is delivered to the subtotal prostate (in blue). Yellow and green lines represent 120% and 150% isodoses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472124002319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Erectile disfunction (ED) is a common long-term side effect of any prostate cancer treatment. Radiation-related ED is thought to be a vascular process, related to venous occlusion caused by radiation. Low dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) is a well-established treatment modality that has an undisputable dose conformality and a theoretical advantage in reducing dose to erectile-related structures when compared to EBRT options. Nevertheless, the role of vessel-sparing LDR-BT technique has not been previously described.

Materials and Methods

PRIAPUS (NCT 04718987) is a prospective, single-arm clinical trial evaluating feasibility and dosimetry associated with a novel LDR BT technique that aims to spare ED-related structures, including the prostatic neurovascular bundles (NVB) contralateral to the index lesion and the penile bulb (Figure 1). The trial planned to accrue 15 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer staged with MRI, with clinically significant disease (CSD) contained to one lobe of the prostate. Primary objective was for 70% of patients to achieve acceptable dose to the target structure while sufficiently sparing ED-related structures. Dosimetry was evaluated on a one-month post-implant CT-scan. In order of priority, the trial's dosimetric goals are: target D90% ≥ 140 Gy, urethra D30% < 130%, contralateral NVB median dose ≤ 50 Gy, and penile bulb D10% ≤ 50 Gy. The LDR BT workflow involved a pre-procedural prostate mpMRI for NVB definition, intra-operative use of a deformable image registration algorithm to translate NVB contours from pre-implant MRI to the live ultrasound images, and intraoperative planning using loose 125-Iodine radioactive seeds with a prescription dose of 145 Gy.

Results

Fifteen patients have been consented: one withdrew consent before receiving treatment, one awaits treatment, and 13 have been successfully treated with post-implant dosimetry available for analysis. In the one-month post-procedure scan, the mean target D90% was 153 Gy (SD ± 10 Gy). All patients but one had a target D90% > 140 Gy. The mean urethra D30% was 129% (SD ±10%). The mean contralateral NVB D50% was 60 Gy (SD ± 13 Gy), with 10 of 13 implants failing to meet the pre-specified goal. For comparison, the ipsilateral NVB which was not spared received a mean D50% of 131 Gy (SD ± 33 Gy). The mean penile bulb D10% was 32 Gy (SD ± 13 Gy). Only two patients had a post-implant dosimetry that met all pre-specified criteria, and so this trial's primary dosimetric endpoint will not be met after the last patient receives treatment.

Conclusions

The pre-specified dosimetric goals were found stringent and seldom achievable and future trials with this technique will require relaxation of the contralateral NVB constraint. While the primary dosimetric endpoint was not met, a substantial dose sparing to the contralateral NVB was achieved while maintaining an ablative dose to the subtotal prostate. Figure 1- Mid-gland T2 axial sequence at 1-month post LDR BT implant in a patient with CSD located in the right lobe. Note dose avoidance to the contralateral neurovascular bundle (contoured in yellow). Prescription dose (in pink colour) is delivered to the subtotal prostate (in blue). Yellow and green lines represent 120% and 150% isodoses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PPP03 演讲时间:上午 10:48
目的勃起功能障碍(ED)是任何前列腺癌治疗常见的长期副作用。与辐射相关的勃起功能障碍被认为是一种血管病变,与辐射导致的静脉闭塞有关。低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR)是一种成熟的治疗方式,与 EBRT 相比,它具有无可争议的剂量一致性和理论上减少勃起相关结构剂量的优势。材料与方法PRIAPUS(NCT 04718987)是一项前瞻性单臂临床试验,旨在评估一种新型 LDR BT 技术的可行性和剂量测定,该技术旨在保留 ED 相关结构,包括索引病变对侧的前列腺神经血管束 (NVB) 和阴茎球(图 1)。该试验计划招募 15 名经磁共振成像分期的中危前列腺癌患者,这些患者的临床重大疾病(CSD)仅限于前列腺的一个叶。主要目标是使70%的患者的靶结构达到可接受的剂量,同时充分保护ED相关结构。剂量测定通过植入后一个月的 CT 扫描进行评估。试验的剂量学目标依次为:靶D90% ≥ 140 Gy,尿道D30% < 130%,对侧NVB中位剂量≤ 50 Gy,阴茎球D10% ≤ 50 Gy。LDR BT工作流程包括:术前进行前列腺mpMRI检查以确定NVB;术中使用可变形图像配准算法将NVB轮廓从植入前的MRI图像转换到实时超声图像;术中使用处方剂量为145 Gy的松散125碘放射性粒子进行规划。在术后一个月的扫描中,目标 D90% 的平均值为 153 Gy (SD ± 10 Gy)。除一名患者外,所有患者的目标 D90% 均为 140 Gy。尿道 D30% 的平均值为 129% (SD ±10%)。对侧 NVB D50% 的平均值为 60 Gy (SD ± 13 Gy),13 个植入体中有 10 个未达到预设目标。相比之下,同侧未受保护的 NVB 的平均 D50% 为 131 Gy(SD ± 33 Gy)。阴茎球部 D10% 的平均值为 32 Gy (SD ± 13 Gy)。只有两名患者的植入后剂量测定符合所有预先指定的标准,因此在最后一名患者接受治疗后,这项试验的主要剂量测定终点将无法达到。虽然没有达到主要剂量学终点,但在保持前列腺次全切除术的消融剂量的同时,对对侧 NVB 实现了大量的剂量疏散。图 1:一名右叶 CSD 患者在 LDR BT 植入术后 1 个月的中腺 T2 轴向序列。注意避免对侧神经血管束造成剂量损伤(黄色轮廓)。处方剂量(粉红色)被输送到前列腺下部(蓝色)。黄线和绿线分别代表 120% 和 150% 等剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy 医学-核医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
9.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Brachytherapy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed articles and selected reviews on the techniques and clinical applications of interstitial and intracavitary radiation in the management of cancers. Laboratory and experimental research relevant to clinical practice is also included. Related disciplines include medical physics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology and radiology. Brachytherapy publishes technical advances, original articles, reviews, and point/counterpoint on controversial issues. Original articles that address any aspect of brachytherapy are invited. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Masthead Table of Contents Thursday, July 11, 20244:00 PM - 5:00 PM PP01 Presentation Time: 4:00 PM MSOR12 Presentation Time: 5:55 PM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1