PP02 Presentation Time: 4:09 PM

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.021
Andre Karius (Dr.), Lisa Marie Leifeld M.Sc., Vratislav Strnad (Prof. Dr.), Rainer Fietkau (Prof. Dr.), Christoph Bert (Prof. Dr.)
{"title":"PP02 Presentation Time: 4:09 PM","authors":"Andre Karius (Dr.),&nbsp;Lisa Marie Leifeld M.Sc.,&nbsp;Vratislav Strnad (Prof. Dr.),&nbsp;Rainer Fietkau (Prof. Dr.),&nbsp;Christoph Bert (Prof. Dr.)","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To enable a real-time applicator navigation and guidance for brachytherapy, we used a novel prototype infra-red tracking camera system directly integrated into a mobile cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner for the first time. We provide the first characterization of the combined device and a corresponding performance evaluation, assessed the respective tracking accuracy, and implemented a prediction of needle courses and tips on CBCT scans based on the infra-red tracking.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a comprehensive assessments of the system's camera calibration and camera-CBCT registration by means of dedicated phantoms. For this, we first evaluated the effects of intrinsic parameters such as temperature or source/detector gantry positions on the positions of the tracked markers. Afterwards, calibrations with various setting (sample number, field of view coverage, calibration directions, calibration distances, and light conditions) were conducted to determine the setting-requirements for achieving maximum tracking quality based on an in-house phantom. The corresponding effects on camera-CBCT registration were also determined by comparing markers tracked and measured via CBCT. Long-term stability was assessed by comparing tracking and a ground-truth weekly for six weeks. Furthermore, a marker-tool rigidly attachable to needles was 3D printed. The respective tool tracking precision and accuracy was evaluated for stationary settings as well as dynamic movements. Moreover, we evaluated Euclidean deviations between tracked markers and marker positions determined via CBCT. For implementing needle tracking, ground-truth models of the tool attached to needles of 200mm and 160mm length were first created and then matched onto the tracked positions, aiming to project the needle courses into CBCT scans. Deviations between projected and actual needle tips were measured. Finally, we put our results into perspective regarding simulations of the devices's tracking uncertainties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Robust and reliable tracking was feasible after a 100 min warm-up period using the tracking system ‘as is’, with positional variations of only 0.11±0.10 mm. Gantry rotations impacted the tracking procedure and led to inaccuracies of up to 0.70 mm. We identified 4000 samples and full coverage to be required for ensuring an optimum marker tracking and camera-CT registration with geometric variations of only 0.18±0.03 mm and 0.42±0.07 mm, respectively. Nevertheless, long-term stability analyses revealed geometric variations larger than two standard deviations compared to the initial calibration occurring after only 3 weeks. For the stationary settings and dynamic movements, we achieved a tool tracking precision and accuracy of 0.04±0.06 mm and 0.16±0.18 mm, respectively. Tracked marker positions deviated by 0.57±0.18mm from the marker positions identified via CBCT. Moreover, predicted needle tips in air deviated by only 1.54±0.68 mm (200mm needle) and 1.40±0.62 mm (160mm needle) from the actual tip locations. The simulated tracking uncertainties resulted in tip variations of 1.75±0.91 mm and 1.43±0.69 mm for the 200mm and 160mm needle, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We implemented for the first time a standalone combined camera-CT system for applicator and needle tracking in brachytherapy. With the innovative system, achieving a high tracking and prediction accuracy of marker-tools and needles was feasible. The system showed excellent pre-conditions and high potential for corresponding tracking workflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472124001570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To enable a real-time applicator navigation and guidance for brachytherapy, we used a novel prototype infra-red tracking camera system directly integrated into a mobile cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner for the first time. We provide the first characterization of the combined device and a corresponding performance evaluation, assessed the respective tracking accuracy, and implemented a prediction of needle courses and tips on CBCT scans based on the infra-red tracking.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a comprehensive assessments of the system's camera calibration and camera-CBCT registration by means of dedicated phantoms. For this, we first evaluated the effects of intrinsic parameters such as temperature or source/detector gantry positions on the positions of the tracked markers. Afterwards, calibrations with various setting (sample number, field of view coverage, calibration directions, calibration distances, and light conditions) were conducted to determine the setting-requirements for achieving maximum tracking quality based on an in-house phantom. The corresponding effects on camera-CBCT registration were also determined by comparing markers tracked and measured via CBCT. Long-term stability was assessed by comparing tracking and a ground-truth weekly for six weeks. Furthermore, a marker-tool rigidly attachable to needles was 3D printed. The respective tool tracking precision and accuracy was evaluated for stationary settings as well as dynamic movements. Moreover, we evaluated Euclidean deviations between tracked markers and marker positions determined via CBCT. For implementing needle tracking, ground-truth models of the tool attached to needles of 200mm and 160mm length were first created and then matched onto the tracked positions, aiming to project the needle courses into CBCT scans. Deviations between projected and actual needle tips were measured. Finally, we put our results into perspective regarding simulations of the devices's tracking uncertainties.

Results

Robust and reliable tracking was feasible after a 100 min warm-up period using the tracking system ‘as is’, with positional variations of only 0.11±0.10 mm. Gantry rotations impacted the tracking procedure and led to inaccuracies of up to 0.70 mm. We identified 4000 samples and full coverage to be required for ensuring an optimum marker tracking and camera-CT registration with geometric variations of only 0.18±0.03 mm and 0.42±0.07 mm, respectively. Nevertheless, long-term stability analyses revealed geometric variations larger than two standard deviations compared to the initial calibration occurring after only 3 weeks. For the stationary settings and dynamic movements, we achieved a tool tracking precision and accuracy of 0.04±0.06 mm and 0.16±0.18 mm, respectively. Tracked marker positions deviated by 0.57±0.18mm from the marker positions identified via CBCT. Moreover, predicted needle tips in air deviated by only 1.54±0.68 mm (200mm needle) and 1.40±0.62 mm (160mm needle) from the actual tip locations. The simulated tracking uncertainties resulted in tip variations of 1.75±0.91 mm and 1.43±0.69 mm for the 200mm and 160mm needle, respectively.

Conclusions

We implemented for the first time a standalone combined camera-CT system for applicator and needle tracking in brachytherapy. With the innovative system, achieving a high tracking and prediction accuracy of marker-tools and needles was feasible. The system showed excellent pre-conditions and high potential for corresponding tracking workflows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PP02 演讲时间:下午 4:09
目的 为了实现近距离放射治疗中施用器的实时导航和引导,我们首次使用了一种直接集成到移动式锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描仪中的新型红外跟踪摄像系统原型。我们首次对这一组合设备进行了鉴定和相应的性能评估,评估了各自的跟踪精度,并根据红外线跟踪对 CBCT 扫描中的针道和针尖进行了预测。为此,我们首先评估了温度或源/探测器龙门架位置等内在参数对跟踪标记位置的影响。之后,我们进行了各种设置(样本数量、视场覆盖范围、校准方向、校准距离和光照条件)的校准,以确定基于内部模型实现最高跟踪质量的设置要求。通过比较 CBCT 追踪和测量的标记,还确定了对相机-CBCT 配对的相应影响。通过每周比较跟踪和地面实况,评估了六周的长期稳定性。此外,还 3D 打印了一种可固定在针上的标记工具。我们评估了静态设置和动态运动中各自工具的跟踪精度和准确性。此外,我们还评估了跟踪标记与通过 CBCT 确定的标记位置之间的欧氏偏差。为了实现针跟踪,我们首先创建了长度分别为 200 毫米和 160 毫米的针所附工具的地面实况模型,然后将其与跟踪位置进行匹配,目的是将针的轨迹投射到 CBCT 扫描中。测量了投影针尖与实际针尖之间的偏差。最后,我们对设备的跟踪不确定性进行了模拟,并对结果进行了透视。 结果使用跟踪系统 "按原样 "进行 100 分钟的预热后,就可以进行稳定可靠的跟踪,位置偏差仅为 0.11±0.10 毫米。龙门架的旋转影响了跟踪程序,导致高达 0.70 毫米的误差。我们确定需要 4000 个样本和全覆盖才能确保最佳的标记跟踪和相机-CT 配准,几何误差分别仅为 0.18±0.03 毫米和 0.42±0.07 毫米。然而,长期稳定性分析表明,与仅 3 周后的初始校准相比,几何变化超过了两个标准偏差。对于静态设置和动态运动,我们实现的工具跟踪精度和准确度分别为 0.04±0.06 毫米和 0.16±0.18 毫米。跟踪的标记位置与通过 CBCT 确定的标记位置偏差为 0.57±0.18 毫米。此外,空气中的预测针尖与实际针尖位置的偏差仅为 1.54±0.68 毫米(200 毫米针)和 1.40±0.62 毫米(160 毫米针)。模拟跟踪的不确定性导致 200 毫米和 160 毫米针尖的偏差分别为 1.75±0.91 毫米和 1.43±0.69 毫米。有了这一创新系统,对标记工具和针头进行高精度跟踪和预测是可行的。该系统在相应的跟踪工作流程中表现出了出色的预处理能力和巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy 医学-核医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
9.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Brachytherapy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed articles and selected reviews on the techniques and clinical applications of interstitial and intracavitary radiation in the management of cancers. Laboratory and experimental research relevant to clinical practice is also included. Related disciplines include medical physics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology and radiology. Brachytherapy publishes technical advances, original articles, reviews, and point/counterpoint on controversial issues. Original articles that address any aspect of brachytherapy are invited. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Masthead Table of Contents Thursday, July 11, 20244:00 PM - 5:00 PM PP01 Presentation Time: 4:00 PM MSOR12 Presentation Time: 5:55 PM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1