MSOR9 Presentation Time: 5:40 PM

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.043
Arjit Baghwala MS, ChengFeng Li MS, Forrest Ivey MS, Devin Olek MS, Kyle Harper MS, Ramiro Pino PhD, Andrew Farach MD
{"title":"MSOR9 Presentation Time: 5:40 PM","authors":"Arjit Baghwala MS,&nbsp;ChengFeng Li MS,&nbsp;Forrest Ivey MS,&nbsp;Devin Olek MS,&nbsp;Kyle Harper MS,&nbsp;Ramiro Pino PhD,&nbsp;Andrew Farach MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In a radiation oncology (RO) clinic, brachytherapy (BT) is a time and resource intensive modality. Constraints to efficiency and throughput include physical resources: afterloader and vault availability, applicator inventory, and OR availability but also physician and support staff availability to maintain efficiency. Thus, several things need to be considered when scheduling cases and having a BT team with each member given their defined roles is essential. The goal of utilizing a BT procedure daily scorecard is to ensure adequate resource allocation and minimize the risk of burnout that could potentially lead to employee dissatisfaction, patient safety events, or turnover on the BT team. Utilizing a similar scorecard method will also be useful to radiation oncologists and RO clinics worldwide when starting or grow a BT program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Each BT procedure was given a score ranging from 1 - 3 (Table 1) based on complexity. A score of 1 was allocated to procedures that were relatively less labor intensive. A score of 2 was given to procedures that required a treatment plan on the day of implant and nursing care. A score of 3 was given to procedures that required BT team members to be in the OR for pre-procedure setup and implantation or implants with longer procedural, treatment planning, and delivery times. The total BT score was limited to no more than 10 on any given day when creating a BT schedule with additional review required for schedules exceeding a score of 10 to allow for appropriate staffing. A retrospective analysis was performed analyzing the number of cases, average start/end time, the average BT score, and the average difficulty per case for 3 months pre-implementation and 3 months post-implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Implementing a daily BT procedural scorecard improved BT procedural efficiency without compromising procedural throughput. Despite maintaining a similar average difficulty of cases performed (1.85 vs 1.78 ±0.47), the clinic time spent in BT was reduced along with the score of the day (9.1 vs 6.87). Utilizing the scoring system may also improve BT team morale due to decreased daily case complexity, shortened hours, and through appropriate procedural staffing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We show utilizing a BT scoring system can improve efficiency of BT workflow without compromising patient throughput. Strategies such as this may help BT clinics improve schedule organization, employee satisfaction, staffing models, and should be considered in all high-volume BT clinics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153847212400179X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In a radiation oncology (RO) clinic, brachytherapy (BT) is a time and resource intensive modality. Constraints to efficiency and throughput include physical resources: afterloader and vault availability, applicator inventory, and OR availability but also physician and support staff availability to maintain efficiency. Thus, several things need to be considered when scheduling cases and having a BT team with each member given their defined roles is essential. The goal of utilizing a BT procedure daily scorecard is to ensure adequate resource allocation and minimize the risk of burnout that could potentially lead to employee dissatisfaction, patient safety events, or turnover on the BT team. Utilizing a similar scorecard method will also be useful to radiation oncologists and RO clinics worldwide when starting or grow a BT program.

Methods

Each BT procedure was given a score ranging from 1 - 3 (Table 1) based on complexity. A score of 1 was allocated to procedures that were relatively less labor intensive. A score of 2 was given to procedures that required a treatment plan on the day of implant and nursing care. A score of 3 was given to procedures that required BT team members to be in the OR for pre-procedure setup and implantation or implants with longer procedural, treatment planning, and delivery times. The total BT score was limited to no more than 10 on any given day when creating a BT schedule with additional review required for schedules exceeding a score of 10 to allow for appropriate staffing. A retrospective analysis was performed analyzing the number of cases, average start/end time, the average BT score, and the average difficulty per case for 3 months pre-implementation and 3 months post-implementation.

Results

Implementing a daily BT procedural scorecard improved BT procedural efficiency without compromising procedural throughput. Despite maintaining a similar average difficulty of cases performed (1.85 vs 1.78 ±0.47), the clinic time spent in BT was reduced along with the score of the day (9.1 vs 6.87). Utilizing the scoring system may also improve BT team morale due to decreased daily case complexity, shortened hours, and through appropriate procedural staffing.

Conclusion

We show utilizing a BT scoring system can improve efficiency of BT workflow without compromising patient throughput. Strategies such as this may help BT clinics improve schedule organization, employee satisfaction, staffing models, and should be considered in all high-volume BT clinics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MSOR9 演讲时间:下午 5:40
目的 在放射肿瘤(RO)诊所,近距离放射治疗(BT)是一种时间和资源密集型治疗方式。制约效率和吞吐量的因素包括物理资源:后装载机和储藏室的可用性、涂药器库存、手术室的可用性,以及医生和支持人员的可用性,以保持效率。因此,在安排病例时需要考虑多方面的因素,而建立一个每个成员都有明确职责的 BT 团队是至关重要的。使用 BT 程序每日记分卡的目的是确保充分的资源分配,并将可能导致员工不满、患者安全事件或 BT 团队人员流失的职业倦怠风险降至最低。采用类似的记分卡方法对全球放射肿瘤学家和 RO 诊所启动或发展 BT 项目也很有用。劳动强度相对较低的手术得分为 1 分。2 分代表需要在植入当天制定治疗计划并进行护理的手术。3 分用于需要 BT 小组成员在手术室进行术前设置和植入,或植入过程、治疗计划和交付时间较长的手术。在制定 BT 计划表时,任何一天的 BT 总分都不得超过 10 分,超过 10 分的计划表还需进行额外审查,以确保人员配备得当。对实施前 3 个月和实施后 3 个月的病例数、平均开始/结束时间、平均 BT 分数和每个病例的平均难度进行了回顾性分析。尽管完成病例的平均难度保持相似(1.85 vs 1.78 ±0.47),但在 BT 中花费的门诊时间与当日得分(9.1 vs 6.87)却有所减少。结论我们的研究表明,使用 BT 评分系统可以提高 BT 工作流程的效率,同时不影响患者的治疗量。此类策略可帮助 BT 诊所改善日程安排、员工满意度和人员配置模式,所有高工作量的 BT 诊所都应考虑采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy 医学-核医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
9.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Brachytherapy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed articles and selected reviews on the techniques and clinical applications of interstitial and intracavitary radiation in the management of cancers. Laboratory and experimental research relevant to clinical practice is also included. Related disciplines include medical physics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology and radiology. Brachytherapy publishes technical advances, original articles, reviews, and point/counterpoint on controversial issues. Original articles that address any aspect of brachytherapy are invited. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Masthead Table of Contents Thursday, July 11, 20244:00 PM - 5:00 PM PP01 Presentation Time: 4:00 PM MSOR12 Presentation Time: 5:55 PM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1