Engaging stakeholders in cultural tourism Living Labs: A pathway to innovation, sustainability, and resilience

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102742
Ante Mandić , Hugues Séraphin , Marija Vuković
{"title":"Engaging stakeholders in cultural tourism Living Labs: A pathway to innovation, sustainability, and resilience","authors":"Ante Mandić ,&nbsp;Hugues Séraphin ,&nbsp;Marija Vuković","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the motivations and benefits driving stakeholder engagement in Living Labs (LLs) for sustainable cultural tourism, with a focus on a case study in Split, Croatia. LLs, which foster innovation through collaboration between stakeholders, are increasingly recognized as essential for addressing sustainability challenges in tourism. Using a combination of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA), we identify key motivations for stakeholder participation, including the desire to shift attitudes toward tourism development, enhance educational initiatives, and improve heritage interpretation. The results reveal that stakeholder engagement not only enriches tourism offerings—such as joint marketing efforts and innovative visitor experiences—but also strengthens resilience in heritage destinations. Our findings emphasize the critical role of ambidextrous management, which balances innovation and resource efficiency, in enhancing stakeholder collaboration. The study provides practical recommendations for smart governance and advocates for stakeholder-centric, bottom-up approaches in the design and management of LLs. These insights contribute to both the theoretical framework and practical implementation of sustainable cultural tourism, offering actionable strategies for policymakers and practitioners to foster local ownership and co-creation in heritage tourism development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102742"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the motivations and benefits driving stakeholder engagement in Living Labs (LLs) for sustainable cultural tourism, with a focus on a case study in Split, Croatia. LLs, which foster innovation through collaboration between stakeholders, are increasingly recognized as essential for addressing sustainability challenges in tourism. Using a combination of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA), we identify key motivations for stakeholder participation, including the desire to shift attitudes toward tourism development, enhance educational initiatives, and improve heritage interpretation. The results reveal that stakeholder engagement not only enriches tourism offerings—such as joint marketing efforts and innovative visitor experiences—but also strengthens resilience in heritage destinations. Our findings emphasize the critical role of ambidextrous management, which balances innovation and resource efficiency, in enhancing stakeholder collaboration. The study provides practical recommendations for smart governance and advocates for stakeholder-centric, bottom-up approaches in the design and management of LLs. These insights contribute to both the theoretical framework and practical implementation of sustainable cultural tourism, offering actionable strategies for policymakers and practitioners to foster local ownership and co-creation in heritage tourism development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让利益攸关方参与文化旅游生活实验室:实现创新、可持续性和复原力的途径
本研究以克罗地亚斯普利特的一个案例研究为重点,探讨了推动利益相关者参与可持续文化旅游业生活实验室(LLs)的动机和益处。生活实验室通过利益相关者之间的合作促进创新,越来越被认为是应对旅游业可持续发展挑战的关键。利用探索性和确认性因素分析(EFA/CFA)相结合的方法,我们确定了利益相关者参与的主要动机,包括转变旅游发展态度、加强教育活动和改善遗产解释的愿望。研究结果表明,利益相关者的参与不仅能丰富旅游产品(如联合营销和创新游客体验),还能增强遗产地的复原力。我们的研究结果强调了兼顾创新和资源效率的双向管理在加强利益相关者合作方面的关键作用。本研究为智能治理提供了实用建议,并倡导在设计和管理遗产地时采用以利益相关者为中心、自下而上的方法。这些见解为可持续文化旅游的理论框架和实际实施做出了贡献,为政策制定者和从业人员在遗产旅游发展中促进地方所有权和共同创造提供了可行的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
The impact of circular economy, sustainable infrastructure, and green FinTech on biodiversity in Europe: A holistic approach Assessing the ecology of cluster-based enterprise trust networks through percolation theory: Is your business environment trustworthy? Designing engagement: Exploring affordances in freemium digital games Innovative resources driven artificial intelligence orientation: The moderating role of environmental and executives’ characteristics The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1