Elemental analyses of feldspathic to basaltic soils and rocks on the moon using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

IF 3.2 2区 化学 Q1 SPECTROSCOPY Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.sab.2024.107049
K. Yumoto , Y. Cho , J.A. Ogura , S. Kameda , T. Niihara , T. Nakaoka , R. Kanemaru , H. Nagaoka , H. Tabata , Y. Nakauchi , M. Ohtake , H. Ueda , S. Kasahara , T. Morota , S. Sugita
{"title":"Elemental analyses of feldspathic to basaltic soils and rocks on the moon using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy","authors":"K. Yumoto ,&nbsp;Y. Cho ,&nbsp;J.A. Ogura ,&nbsp;S. Kameda ,&nbsp;T. Niihara ,&nbsp;T. Nakaoka ,&nbsp;R. Kanemaru ,&nbsp;H. Nagaoka ,&nbsp;H. Tabata ,&nbsp;Y. Nakauchi ,&nbsp;M. Ohtake ,&nbsp;H. Ueda ,&nbsp;S. Kasahara ,&nbsp;T. Morota ,&nbsp;S. Sugita","doi":"10.1016/j.sab.2024.107049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In-situ analysis of major elements using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is essential for future lunar landing missions, yet its performance under lunar conditions remains not fully understood. This uncertainty arises from the absence of an atmosphere and the diverse range of surface materials, which vary in chemical composition from anorthosites to basalts, and in physical properties from fine regolith to boulders. To address these challenges, we developed and cross-validated a multivariate LIBS calibration model by measuring 169 compressed fine powders of geologic samples under vacuum. These samples fully encompass the bulk composition range of lunar meteorites. We investigated the applicability of the model to a wider range of samples by measuring lunar meteorites, terrestrial anorthites, and lunar simulants in various physical forms, including rock chips and soils with different grain sizes and bulk densities. For powder samples, the quantification accuracy, assessed using root mean squared error (RMSE), resulted in 2.5 wt% SiO<sub>2</sub>, 0.25 wt% TiO<sub>2</sub>, 1.2 wt% Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, 1.3 wt% MgO, 1.2 wt% CaO, 0.33 wt% Na<sub>2</sub>O, 0.47 wt% K<sub>2</sub>O (0.060 wt% K<sub>2</sub>O in the &lt;1 wt% range), and 1.5 wt% T-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. For rock chip samples, the RMSEs were 3.1 wt% SiO<sub>2</sub>, 0.32 wt% TiO<sub>2</sub>, 2.2 wt% Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, 2.5 wt% MgO, 2.0 wt% CaO, 0.33 wt% Na<sub>2</sub>O, 0.089 wt% K<sub>2</sub>O, and 2.1 wt% T-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. Despite significant differences in physical conditions between powders and rocks, their RMSEs remained consistent within a factor of two. Changes in grain size or bulk density of soils had relatively minor effects on the RMSE. These RMSEs confirm that the quantification accuracy of LIBS is sufficient to distinguish the subgroups within the lunar anorthosite suite (e.g., anorthosites vs. norites) and basalts (e.g., high-Ti vs. low-Ti) across a range of soil types, from coarse to fine and from loose to compact, as well as rocks. Furthermore, our analysis shows that LIBS can differentiate between “purest” and “pure” anorthosites (98 and 95 vol% plagioclase, respectively) based on the 3σ detection limits of Mg and Fe lines. These capabilities of LIBS align well with the goals of future lunar exploration, such as locating ilmenite-rich soils for resource extraction, detecting purest anorthosites to understand early lunar evolution, and identifying noritic impact melts to refine lunar chronology. Overall, our results demonstrate that LIBS serves as a versatile tool for rapid geochemical characterization on the Moon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21890,"journal":{"name":"Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 107049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0584854724001939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-situ analysis of major elements using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is essential for future lunar landing missions, yet its performance under lunar conditions remains not fully understood. This uncertainty arises from the absence of an atmosphere and the diverse range of surface materials, which vary in chemical composition from anorthosites to basalts, and in physical properties from fine regolith to boulders. To address these challenges, we developed and cross-validated a multivariate LIBS calibration model by measuring 169 compressed fine powders of geologic samples under vacuum. These samples fully encompass the bulk composition range of lunar meteorites. We investigated the applicability of the model to a wider range of samples by measuring lunar meteorites, terrestrial anorthites, and lunar simulants in various physical forms, including rock chips and soils with different grain sizes and bulk densities. For powder samples, the quantification accuracy, assessed using root mean squared error (RMSE), resulted in 2.5 wt% SiO2, 0.25 wt% TiO2, 1.2 wt% Al2O3, 1.3 wt% MgO, 1.2 wt% CaO, 0.33 wt% Na2O, 0.47 wt% K2O (0.060 wt% K2O in the <1 wt% range), and 1.5 wt% T-Fe2O3. For rock chip samples, the RMSEs were 3.1 wt% SiO2, 0.32 wt% TiO2, 2.2 wt% Al2O3, 2.5 wt% MgO, 2.0 wt% CaO, 0.33 wt% Na2O, 0.089 wt% K2O, and 2.1 wt% T-Fe2O3. Despite significant differences in physical conditions between powders and rocks, their RMSEs remained consistent within a factor of two. Changes in grain size or bulk density of soils had relatively minor effects on the RMSE. These RMSEs confirm that the quantification accuracy of LIBS is sufficient to distinguish the subgroups within the lunar anorthosite suite (e.g., anorthosites vs. norites) and basalts (e.g., high-Ti vs. low-Ti) across a range of soil types, from coarse to fine and from loose to compact, as well as rocks. Furthermore, our analysis shows that LIBS can differentiate between “purest” and “pure” anorthosites (98 and 95 vol% plagioclase, respectively) based on the 3σ detection limits of Mg and Fe lines. These capabilities of LIBS align well with the goals of future lunar exploration, such as locating ilmenite-rich soils for resource extraction, detecting purest anorthosites to understand early lunar evolution, and identifying noritic impact melts to refine lunar chronology. Overall, our results demonstrate that LIBS serves as a versatile tool for rapid geochemical characterization on the Moon.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用激光诱导击穿光谱对月球上的长岩至玄武岩土壤和岩石进行元素分析
利用激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)对主要元素进行原位分析对未来的登月任务至关重要,但其在月球条件下的性能仍未得到充分了解。造成这种不确定性的原因是月球没有大气层,而且月球表面材料多种多样,从正长岩到玄武岩,化学成分各不相同;从细粒碎屑岩到巨石,物理特性也各不相同。为了应对这些挑战,我们开发了一个多变量 LIBS 校准模型,并通过在真空条件下测量 169 个压缩的地质样品细粉末进行了交叉验证。这些样本完全涵盖了月球陨石的主体成分范围。我们通过测量各种物理形态的月球陨石、陆地正长岩和月球模拟物(包括具有不同粒度和体积密度的岩屑和土壤),研究了该模型对更广泛样品的适用性。对于粉末样品,使用均方根误差 (RMSE) 评估的量化精度为:2.5 wt% SiO2、0.25 wt% TiO2、1.2 wt% Al2O3、1.3 wt% MgO、1.2 wt% CaO、0.33 wt% Na2O、0.47 wt% K2O(0.060 wt% K2O 在 1 wt% 范围内)和 1.5 wt% T-Fe2O3。对于岩屑样品,均方根误差为 3.1 wt% SiO2、0.32 wt% TiO2、2.2 wt% Al2O3、2.5 wt% MgO、2.0 wt% CaO、0.33 wt% Na2O、0.089 wt% K2O 和 2.1 wt% T-Fe2O3。尽管粉末和岩石的物理条件存在显著差异,但它们的均方根误差仍保持在 2 倍以内。土壤粒度或体积密度的变化对均方根误差的影响相对较小。这些均方根误差证实,在从粗到细、从松散到紧密的各种土壤类型以及岩石中,LIBS 的量化精度足以区分月球正长岩套件中的亚组(如正长岩与诺氏岩)和玄武岩(如高钛与低钛)。此外,我们的分析表明,根据镁线和铁线的 3σ 检测限,LIBS 可以区分 "最纯 "和 "纯 "正长岩(斜长石含量分别为 98 和 95 vol%)。LIBS的这些功能与未来月球探测的目标非常吻合,例如找到富含钛铁矿的土壤以提取资源,探测最纯的正长岩以了解早期月球演化,以及识别诺饭石撞击熔体以完善月球年代学。总之,我们的研究结果表明,LIBS 是快速描述月球地球化学特征的多功能工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, is intended for the rapid publication of both original work and reviews in the following fields: Atomic Emission (AES), Atomic Absorption (AAS) and Atomic Fluorescence (AFS) spectroscopy; Mass Spectrometry (MS) for inorganic analysis covering Spark Source (SS-MS), Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP-MS), Glow Discharge (GD-MS), and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS). Laser induced atomic spectroscopy for inorganic analysis, including non-linear optical laser spectroscopy, covering Laser Enhanced Ionization (LEI), Laser Induced Fluorescence (LIF), Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy (RIS) and Resonance Ionization Mass Spectrometry (RIMS); Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS); Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy (CRDS), Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (LA-ICP-AES) and Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). X-ray spectrometry, X-ray Optics and Microanalysis, including X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) and related techniques, in particular Total-reflection X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (TXRF), and Synchrotron Radiation-excited Total reflection XRF (SR-TXRF). Manuscripts dealing with (i) fundamentals, (ii) methodology development, (iii)instrumentation, and (iv) applications, can be submitted for publication.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of acupuncture's effectiveness in treating gulf war illness using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Characterization of the distribution of mineral elements in chromium-stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and data augmentation Rapid determination of 90Sr in seawater using a novel porous crown-based resin and tandem quadrupole ICP-MS/MS in cool plasma and O2-He mode Consideration of spectral interference in total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis using a limited number of calibration samples: Case study of ocean polymetallic nodules Signal enhancement with double-pulse LIBS on biological samples and better discrimination of tissues through machine learning algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1