{"title":"Reducing Respiratory Motion Artifacts in Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI: Assessing Assisted Breath-Holding Effectiveness","authors":"Mr Renqiang Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluates the effectiveness of the assisted breath-holding technique in improving image quality by reducing motion artifacts associated with gadoxetate-enhancement during the transient arterial phase compared to the conventional breathing approach in liver MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a comprehensive analysis of liver MRI scans from 261 consecutive patients subjected to gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. Our focus was on evaluating motion artifact severity during the arterial phase, categorizing the cases into two groups: assisted breath-holding (130/261 cases) and traditional breathing (131/261 cases). Two independent, blinded readers rigorously assessed image quality using a 5-point scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A pronounced and statistically significant enhancement in arterial phase image quality scores was observed in patients employing the assisted breath-holding method as compared to the traditional approach (p = 0.006). The incidence of moderate and severe respiratory artifacts during the arterial phase notably decreased from 17.557% to 4.615% following the implementation of the assisted breath-holding technique (χ² = 11.065, p = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The utilization of the assisted breath-holding method led to a substantial enhancement in the image quality during the arterial phase of gadoxetate-enhanced liver MRI scans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424002169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the assisted breath-holding technique in improving image quality by reducing motion artifacts associated with gadoxetate-enhancement during the transient arterial phase compared to the conventional breathing approach in liver MRI.
Methods
We performed a comprehensive analysis of liver MRI scans from 261 consecutive patients subjected to gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. Our focus was on evaluating motion artifact severity during the arterial phase, categorizing the cases into two groups: assisted breath-holding (130/261 cases) and traditional breathing (131/261 cases). Two independent, blinded readers rigorously assessed image quality using a 5-point scale.
Results
A pronounced and statistically significant enhancement in arterial phase image quality scores was observed in patients employing the assisted breath-holding method as compared to the traditional approach (p = 0.006). The incidence of moderate and severe respiratory artifacts during the arterial phase notably decreased from 17.557% to 4.615% following the implementation of the assisted breath-holding technique (χ² = 11.065, p = 0.001).
Conclusion
The utilization of the assisted breath-holding method led to a substantial enhancement in the image quality during the arterial phase of gadoxetate-enhanced liver MRI scans.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.