Potential impact of introducing a neutral positive countercyclical capital buffer in EU countries

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS Central Bank Review Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cbrev.2024.100180
Paweł Smaga
{"title":"Potential impact of introducing a neutral positive countercyclical capital buffer in EU countries","authors":"Paweł Smaga","doi":"10.1016/j.cbrev.2024.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study is to assess the potential to introduce a positive neutral rate for the countercyclical capital buffer (nCCyB) at 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2% in 20 EU countries over the period 2014Q4 up to 2023Q3. Prudential data at country-level was used to estimate the level of banks' voluntary management buffers, which were found to be significant overall (although gradually decreasing) and enough to accommodate the introduction of the nCCyB. According to estimations, introduction of the nCCyB at those rates would have reduced banks’ management buffers on average by 6.5–26.0%. However, there is visible heterogeneity among EU countries. The resulting lowest decrease in capital headroom following the potential introduction of the nCCyB was recorded, among others, in Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Ireland, with the highest in Spain, Croatia, Greece, and Austria. However, the adoption of the nCCyB in recent years faces several hurdles, which constitute challenges for banks and policymakers alike.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43998,"journal":{"name":"Central Bank Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Bank Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070124000349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the potential to introduce a positive neutral rate for the countercyclical capital buffer (nCCyB) at 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2% in 20 EU countries over the period 2014Q4 up to 2023Q3. Prudential data at country-level was used to estimate the level of banks' voluntary management buffers, which were found to be significant overall (although gradually decreasing) and enough to accommodate the introduction of the nCCyB. According to estimations, introduction of the nCCyB at those rates would have reduced banks’ management buffers on average by 6.5–26.0%. However, there is visible heterogeneity among EU countries. The resulting lowest decrease in capital headroom following the potential introduction of the nCCyB was recorded, among others, in Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Ireland, with the highest in Spain, Croatia, Greece, and Austria. However, the adoption of the nCCyB in recent years faces several hurdles, which constitute challenges for banks and policymakers alike.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟国家引入中性正向反周期资本缓冲的潜在影响
本研究旨在评估 20 个欧盟国家在 2014 年第四季度至 2023 年第三季度期间引入 0.5%、1%、1.5% 和 2%的正中性反周期资本缓冲率(nCCyB)的可能性。国家层面的审慎数据被用来估算银行自愿管理缓冲的水平,结果发现这些缓冲总体上是显著的(尽管在逐渐减少),足以适应 nCCyB 的引入。根据估算,按这些比率引入 nCCyB 将使银行的管理缓冲平均减少 6.5-26.0%。然而,欧盟国家之间存在明显的差异。瑞典、捷克共和国、斯洛伐克、马耳他、爱尔兰等国在可能引入 nCCyB 后,资本净空的降幅最小,而西班牙、克罗地亚、希腊和奥地利的降幅最大。然而,近年来采用 nCCyB 面临着一些障碍,对银行和政策制定者都构成了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central Bank Review
Central Bank Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Domestic inflation decomposition in a small open economy: Evidence from import price dynamics in Kazakhstan Potential impact of introducing a neutral positive countercyclical capital buffer in EU countries Bank loan maturity and corporate investment Singular spectrum analysis to estimate core inflation in Brazil Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1