Using combustion analysis to simultaneously measure soil organic and inorganic carbon

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117066
Tiffany L. Carter , Crystal Schaecher , Steve Monteith , Richard Ferguson
{"title":"Using combustion analysis to simultaneously measure soil organic and inorganic carbon","authors":"Tiffany L. Carter ,&nbsp;Crystal Schaecher ,&nbsp;Steve Monteith ,&nbsp;Richard Ferguson","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) are of longstanding interest due to their relationship with other key soil properties and indications for soil health and carbon storage. At the USDA-NRCS Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory (KSSL), total carbon (SOC + SIC) is determined via dry combustion analysis, while calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) equivalent is determined via manocalcimetry. For calcareous (carbonate bearing) samples, SIC is estimated as 12 % of CaCO<sub>3</sub> equivalent, while SOC is estimated as the difference between measured total carbon and estimated SIC. An alternative dry combustion method for the measurement of SOC and SIC pools was evaluated with the goal of directly measuring – not estimating – inorganic and organic carbon on calcareous samples. The alternative temperature ramp dry combustion (TRDC) method comprises two variants that differ in ramp cycle and carrier gases used. One variant operates under continuous oxygen and has temperature ramp plateaus of 400, 600 and 900 °C; thus, it is referred to as the non-gas switching variant or TRDC<sub>NGS</sub>. The other variant operates under oxygen until 400 °C, then switches to nitrogen gas for a ramp to 900 °C, then reintroduces oxygen at 900 °C; thus, it is referred to as the gas switching variant or TRDC<sub>GS</sub>. Both variants were applied in duplicate to 110 diverse samples, including 32 calcareous samples, from across the USA that had been previously characterized by the KSSL. Samples were selected to capture wide variability in carbon contents. Comparing carbon data outcomes with data from the legacy KSSL methods revealed the TRDC<sub>GS</sub> variant as best for calcareous samples, whereas the TRDC<sub>NGS</sub> variant was preferred for non-calcareous samples. A combination of the two method variants offers an accurate and direct measurement of SOC and SIC. For calcareous samples, mid-infrared (MIR) spectral analysis demonstrated TRDC method as slightly more accurate than legacy KSSL methods for estimating SOC and SIC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002957","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) are of longstanding interest due to their relationship with other key soil properties and indications for soil health and carbon storage. At the USDA-NRCS Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory (KSSL), total carbon (SOC + SIC) is determined via dry combustion analysis, while calcium carbonate (CaCO3) equivalent is determined via manocalcimetry. For calcareous (carbonate bearing) samples, SIC is estimated as 12 % of CaCO3 equivalent, while SOC is estimated as the difference between measured total carbon and estimated SIC. An alternative dry combustion method for the measurement of SOC and SIC pools was evaluated with the goal of directly measuring – not estimating – inorganic and organic carbon on calcareous samples. The alternative temperature ramp dry combustion (TRDC) method comprises two variants that differ in ramp cycle and carrier gases used. One variant operates under continuous oxygen and has temperature ramp plateaus of 400, 600 and 900 °C; thus, it is referred to as the non-gas switching variant or TRDCNGS. The other variant operates under oxygen until 400 °C, then switches to nitrogen gas for a ramp to 900 °C, then reintroduces oxygen at 900 °C; thus, it is referred to as the gas switching variant or TRDCGS. Both variants were applied in duplicate to 110 diverse samples, including 32 calcareous samples, from across the USA that had been previously characterized by the KSSL. Samples were selected to capture wide variability in carbon contents. Comparing carbon data outcomes with data from the legacy KSSL methods revealed the TRDCGS variant as best for calcareous samples, whereas the TRDCNGS variant was preferred for non-calcareous samples. A combination of the two method variants offers an accurate and direct measurement of SOC and SIC. For calcareous samples, mid-infrared (MIR) spectral analysis demonstrated TRDC method as slightly more accurate than legacy KSSL methods for estimating SOC and SIC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用燃烧分析同时测量土壤有机碳和无机碳
由于土壤有机碳 (SOC) 和土壤无机碳 (SIC) 与其他关键土壤性质的关系以及对土壤健康和碳储存的指示作用,它们长期以来一直备受关注。在 USDA-NRCS 凯洛格土壤调查实验室(KSSL),总碳量(SOC + SIC)是通过干燃烧分析确定的,而碳酸钙(CaCO3)当量则是通过人碳测量法确定的。对于石灰质(含碳酸盐)样本,SIC 按 CaCO3 当量的 12% 估算,而 SOC 则按测量的总碳量与估算的 SIC 之差估算。为了直接测量(而不是估算)钙质样本的无机碳和有机碳,我们评估了另一种测量 SOC 和 SIC 库的干燃烧方法。替代的温度斜坡干法(TRDC)包括两种变体,它们在斜坡周期和使用的载气方面有所不同。一种变体在持续氧气条件下运行,温度斜坡平台分别为 400、600 和 900 °C;因此被称为非气体切换变体或 TRDCNGS。另一个变体在氧气条件下运行至 400 ℃,然后切换到氮气,温度斜坡上升至 900 ℃,然后在 900 ℃ 时重新引入氧气;因此,它被称为气体切换变体或 TRDCGS。这两种变体都被一式两份地应用于 110 个不同的样品,其中包括 32 个钙质样品,这些样品来自美国各地,之前已被 KSSL 鉴定过。样本的选择是为了捕捉碳含量的巨大差异。将碳数据结果与 KSSL 传统方法的数据进行比较后发现,TRDCGS 变体最适用于钙质样本,而 TRDCNGS 变体则更适用于非钙质样本。将这两种方法变体结合起来,可以准确、直接地测量 SOC 和 SIC。对于钙质样本,中红外(MIR)光谱分析表明 TRDC 方法在估算 SOC 和 SIC 方面比传统的 KSSL 方法更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring soil cracking using OFDR-based distributed temperature sensing framework Depth impacts on the aggregate-mediated mechanisms of root carbon stabilization in soil: Trade-off between MAOM and POM pathways Can inert pool models improve predictions of biochar long-term persistence in soils? Impact of a synthetic zeolite mixed with soils of different pedological characteristics on soil physical quality indices Driving factors of variation in fertilizer nitrogen recovery efficiency in maize cropping systems across China and its microbial mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1