The ties that bind: Understanding the mental health consequences of the Windrush Scandal and hostile immigration policies on survivors in the UK

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100352
Karlie Janes , Patrick Vernon , Dawn Estefan , Farah Sheibani , Glenda Caesar , Rochelle A. Burgess
{"title":"The ties that bind: Understanding the mental health consequences of the Windrush Scandal and hostile immigration policies on survivors in the UK","authors":"Karlie Janes ,&nbsp;Patrick Vernon ,&nbsp;Dawn Estefan ,&nbsp;Farah Sheibani ,&nbsp;Glenda Caesar ,&nbsp;Rochelle A. Burgess","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Home Office Windrush Scandal of 2018 has had major implications for the wellbeing of survivors and is thought to have affected more than 15,000 individuals. The Government led compensation scheme to provide retribution to those impacted has been consistently argued as insufficient, in part linked to under appreciation of mental health consequences of the scandal. However, there is limited evidence which documents the nature of mental health issues that survivors and families have faced. This need for further evidence intersects with the need to protect a highly vulnerable community from further traumatisation. Our study contributes to this gap through a content analysis of survivor testimonies (n = 96) published in publicly available media sources between 2017 and 2023. Analysis explored social pathways to the development of mental distress and experiences of potential mental health consequences. Our analysis was informed by a complex trauma and complex racial trauma framework. Findings demonstrate that the scandal disrupted numerous social domains linked to livelihoods and positive wellbeing, driving survivors into homelessness, and experiences of dehumanization within state systems. This shaped survivors’ experiences of emotional distress, resulting in symptoms linked to depression, chronic stress, and anxiety disorders. Our work illuminates new details about the nature of trauma faced by survivors. Findings suggest the need for systems that provide targeted mental health supports that also address social disruption, to fully respond to the harms created by the scandal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Home Office Windrush Scandal of 2018 has had major implications for the wellbeing of survivors and is thought to have affected more than 15,000 individuals. The Government led compensation scheme to provide retribution to those impacted has been consistently argued as insufficient, in part linked to under appreciation of mental health consequences of the scandal. However, there is limited evidence which documents the nature of mental health issues that survivors and families have faced. This need for further evidence intersects with the need to protect a highly vulnerable community from further traumatisation. Our study contributes to this gap through a content analysis of survivor testimonies (n = 96) published in publicly available media sources between 2017 and 2023. Analysis explored social pathways to the development of mental distress and experiences of potential mental health consequences. Our analysis was informed by a complex trauma and complex racial trauma framework. Findings demonstrate that the scandal disrupted numerous social domains linked to livelihoods and positive wellbeing, driving survivors into homelessness, and experiences of dehumanization within state systems. This shaped survivors’ experiences of emotional distress, resulting in symptoms linked to depression, chronic stress, and anxiety disorders. Our work illuminates new details about the nature of trauma faced by survivors. Findings suggest the need for systems that provide targeted mental health supports that also address social disruption, to fully respond to the harms created by the scandal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧密联系:了解 Windrush 丑闻和敌对移民政策对英国幸存者心理健康的影响
2018 年的内政部 "拉什风 "丑闻对幸存者的福祉产生了重大影响,据认为影响人数超过 15000 人。政府主导的补偿计划为受影响者提供了补偿,但一直被认为是不够的,部分原因与对丑闻造成的心理健康后果认识不足有关。然而,记录幸存者及其家人所面临的心理健康问题性质的证据非常有限。对进一步证据的需求与保护极易受到伤害的群体免受进一步创伤的需求交织在一起。我们的研究通过对 2017 年至 2023 年间公开媒体发表的幸存者证词(n = 96)进行内容分析,弥补了这一空白。分析探讨了精神痛苦发展的社会途径以及潜在精神健康后果的经历。我们的分析参考了复杂创伤和复杂种族创伤框架。研究结果表明,丑闻扰乱了与生计和积极福祉相关的众多社会领域,导致幸存者无家可归,并在国家系统中经历了非人化的体验。这影响了幸存者的情绪困扰体验,导致了与抑郁、慢性压力和焦虑症相关的症状。我们的工作揭示了幸存者所面临的创伤本质的新细节。研究结果表明,为了全面应对丑闻造成的伤害,有必要建立一个系统,提供有针对性的心理健康支持,同时解决社会混乱问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
Developing peer-led recovery groups (PRIZE) for people with psychosis and their caregivers in a low resource South African setting The social construction of mental illness stigma amongst Asians: A systematic review and meta-ethnography Exploring the societal implications of digital mental health technologies: A critical review Juggling to stay afloat: Debt and health under financialization Developing an explanatory model of alcohol misuse among South Sudanese refugees in northern Uganda: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1