The pace of biological aging significantly mediates the relationship between internalized stigma of chronic pain and chronic low back pain severity among non-hispanic black but not non-hispanic white adults

Q2 Medicine Neurobiology of Pain Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100170
Khalid W. Freij , Fiona B.A.T. Agbor , Kiari R. Kinnie , Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra , Tammie L. Quinn , Hemant K. Tiwari , Robert E. Sorge , Burel R. Goodin , Edwin N. Aroke
{"title":"The pace of biological aging significantly mediates the relationship between internalized stigma of chronic pain and chronic low back pain severity among non-hispanic black but not non-hispanic white adults","authors":"Khalid W. Freij ,&nbsp;Fiona B.A.T. Agbor ,&nbsp;Kiari R. Kinnie ,&nbsp;Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra ,&nbsp;Tammie L. Quinn ,&nbsp;Hemant K. Tiwari ,&nbsp;Robert E. Sorge ,&nbsp;Burel R. Goodin ,&nbsp;Edwin N. Aroke","doi":"10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to determine the nature of the relationship between the internalized stigma of chronic pain (ISCP), the pace of biological aging, and racial disparities in nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP). We used Dunedin Pace of Aging from the Epigenome (DunedinPACE), Horvath’s, Hannum’s, and PhenoAge clocks to determine the pace of biological aging in adults, ages 18 to 82 years: 74 no pain, 56 low-impact pain, and 76 high-impact pain. Individuals with high-impact pain reported higher levels of ISCP and DunedinPACE compared to those with low-impact or no pain (p &lt; 0.001). There was no significant relationship between ISCP and epigenetic age acceleration from Horvath, Hannum, and PhenoAge clocks (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). Mediation analysis showed that an association between ISCP and pain severity and interference was mediated by the pace of biological aging (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001). We further found that race moderated the indirect effect of ISCP on pain severity and interference, with ISCP being a stronger positive predictor of the pace of biological aging for non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) than for non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Future bio-behavioral interventions targeting internalized stigma surrounding chronic pain at various levels are necessary. A deeper understanding of the biological aging process could lead to improvements in managing nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP), particularly within underserved minority populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52177,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Pain","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the nature of the relationship between the internalized stigma of chronic pain (ISCP), the pace of biological aging, and racial disparities in nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP). We used Dunedin Pace of Aging from the Epigenome (DunedinPACE), Horvath’s, Hannum’s, and PhenoAge clocks to determine the pace of biological aging in adults, ages 18 to 82 years: 74 no pain, 56 low-impact pain, and 76 high-impact pain. Individuals with high-impact pain reported higher levels of ISCP and DunedinPACE compared to those with low-impact or no pain (p < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between ISCP and epigenetic age acceleration from Horvath, Hannum, and PhenoAge clocks (p > 0.05). Mediation analysis showed that an association between ISCP and pain severity and interference was mediated by the pace of biological aging (p ≤ 0.001). We further found that race moderated the indirect effect of ISCP on pain severity and interference, with ISCP being a stronger positive predictor of the pace of biological aging for non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) than for non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Future bio-behavioral interventions targeting internalized stigma surrounding chronic pain at various levels are necessary. A deeper understanding of the biological aging process could lead to improvements in managing nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP), particularly within underserved minority populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非西班牙裔黑人而非非西班牙裔白人成年人中,生物衰老的速度对慢性疼痛内化耻辱感与慢性腰背痛严重程度之间的关系有明显的中介作用
本研究旨在确定慢性疼痛内化成见(ISCP)、生物衰老速度和非特异性慢性腰背痛(CLBP)的种族差异之间关系的性质。我们使用 Dunedin Pace of Aging from the Epigenome (DunedinPACE)、Horvath's、Hannum's 和 PhenoAge 时钟来确定 18 至 82 岁成年人的生物衰老速度:74 人无疼痛感,56 人有轻微疼痛感,76 人有剧烈疼痛感。与低度疼痛或无疼痛的人相比,高度疼痛的人报告的 ISCP 和 DunedinPACE 水平更高(p < 0.001)。ISCP与来自Horvath、Hannum和PhenoAge时钟的表观遗传年龄加速度之间没有明显关系(p > 0.05)。中介分析表明,ISCP 与疼痛严重程度和干扰之间的关系是由生物衰老速度中介的(p ≤ 0.001)。我们还发现,种族调节了 ISCP 对疼痛严重程度和干扰的间接影响,对于非西班牙裔黑人(NHBs)而言,ISCP 对生物衰老速度的正向预测作用强于非西班牙裔白人(NHWs)。未来有必要在各个层面针对围绕慢性疼痛的内化成见采取生物行为干预措施。加深对生物衰老过程的了解,可以改善非特异性慢性腰背痛(CLBP)的管理,尤其是在服务不足的少数民族人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Pain
Neurobiology of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
54 days
期刊最新文献
An investigation on the role of oxytocin in chronic neuropathic pain in a Wistar rat model Adult zymosan re-exposure exacerbates the molecular alterations in the brainstem rostral ventromedial medulla of rats with early life zymosan-induced cystitis Neuronal activation patterns during self-referential pain imagination Interleukin-6 induces nascent protein synthesis in human dorsal root ganglion nociceptors primarily via MNK-eIF4E signaling The timing of the mouse hind paw incision does not influence postsurgical pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1