Comparision of attributes between young and old patients who died in hospital after bowel obstruction: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

Valentine Martin , Délia Berrada , Antoine Duclos , Stéphanie Polazzi , Jean-Yves Mabrut , Olivier Monneuse , Mustapha Adham , Olivier Glehen , Eddy Cotte , Guillaume Passot , Société de Chirurgie de Lyon*
{"title":"Comparision of attributes between young and old patients who died in hospital after bowel obstruction: A multicenter retrospective cohort study","authors":"Valentine Martin ,&nbsp;Délia Berrada ,&nbsp;Antoine Duclos ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Polazzi ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Mabrut ,&nbsp;Olivier Monneuse ,&nbsp;Mustapha Adham ,&nbsp;Olivier Glehen ,&nbsp;Eddy Cotte ,&nbsp;Guillaume Passot ,&nbsp;Société de Chirurgie de Lyon*","doi":"10.1016/j.soda.2024.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intestinal obstruction is one of the most frequent emergencies in gastrointestinal surgery and can concern patients of all ages and be life threatening. Postoperative mortality is reported to be higher in elderly patients, but there is currently no published study encompassing all patients regardless of their treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes between older and younger patients deceased after all kind bowel obstruction treated surgically or not.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively included all consecutive patients declared dead following bowel obstruction, from 2007 to 2020, in 3 University hospital in Lyon, France. Patients were classified according to age, &lt;75 and ≥75 years based on the definition of elderly patients of the French Haute Autorité de Santé. Patient's selection was made with the hospital discharge database and medical records were collected from the local electronic database.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 222 patients were included; 130 patients were aged ≥75 years and 92 &lt; 75 years. Most patients did not show signs of severity at admission. Patients ≥75 years had a higher rate of death by acute respiratory distress (<em>p</em> = 0.02), while there is a trend to a higher frequency of death by general deterioration in a context of advanced cancer in the younger group (<em>p</em> = 0.06).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intra-hospital death after bowel obstruction concerns patients of all ages, treated surgically or not. Elderly patients die from respiratory complications, and younger ones die from general deterioration in context of cancer. Most deceased patients did not show signs of severity at admission.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101190,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667008924000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intestinal obstruction is one of the most frequent emergencies in gastrointestinal surgery and can concern patients of all ages and be life threatening. Postoperative mortality is reported to be higher in elderly patients, but there is currently no published study encompassing all patients regardless of their treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes between older and younger patients deceased after all kind bowel obstruction treated surgically or not.

Methods

We retrospectively included all consecutive patients declared dead following bowel obstruction, from 2007 to 2020, in 3 University hospital in Lyon, France. Patients were classified according to age, <75 and ≥75 years based on the definition of elderly patients of the French Haute Autorité de Santé. Patient's selection was made with the hospital discharge database and medical records were collected from the local electronic database.

Results

A total of 222 patients were included; 130 patients were aged ≥75 years and 92 < 75 years. Most patients did not show signs of severity at admission. Patients ≥75 years had a higher rate of death by acute respiratory distress (p = 0.02), while there is a trend to a higher frequency of death by general deterioration in a context of advanced cancer in the younger group (p = 0.06).

Conclusion

Intra-hospital death after bowel obstruction concerns patients of all ages, treated surgically or not. Elderly patients die from respiratory complications, and younger ones die from general deterioration in context of cancer. Most deceased patients did not show signs of severity at admission.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因肠梗阻住院死亡的年轻和年长患者的属性比较:多中心回顾性队列研究
背景肠梗阻是胃肠道手术中最常见的急症之一,可危及所有年龄段患者的生命。据报道,老年患者的术后死亡率较高,但目前还没有一项公开发表的研究涵盖所有患者,无论其接受何种治疗。本研究旨在比较各种肠梗阻经手术或非手术治疗后死亡的老年患者和年轻患者的结局。方法我们回顾性地纳入了法国里昂 3 所大学医院在 2007 年至 2020 年期间因肠梗阻而死亡的所有连续患者。根据法国卫生高级管理局对老年患者的定义,患者按年龄分为75岁和≥75岁。结果 共纳入 222 名患者,其中 130 名患者年龄≥75 岁,92 名患者年龄 < 75 岁。大多数患者入院时并无严重症状。年龄≥75岁的患者因急性呼吸窘迫死亡的比例较高(p = 0.02),而年轻组患者因晚期癌症全身状况恶化死亡的比例呈上升趋势(p = 0.06)。老年患者死于呼吸系统并发症,年轻患者死于癌症导致的全身状况恶化。大多数死亡患者在入院时并没有表现出病情严重的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associated factors with nonoperative management failure in bowel obstruction Laparoscopic proctocolectomy in Crohn's disease with complete mesocolic excision and total mesorectal excision Comparision of attributes between young and old patients who died in hospital after bowel obstruction: A multicenter retrospective cohort study Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Improving outcomes in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection: The benefits of REAL score in preoperative risk assessment for anastomotic leak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1