Effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders: An umbrella review of meta-analyses

Anthony Jeitani , Paul P. Fahey , Michael Gascoigne , Abha Darnal , David Lim
{"title":"Effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders: An umbrella review of meta-analyses","authors":"Anthony Jeitani ,&nbsp;Paul P. Fahey ,&nbsp;Michael Gascoigne ,&nbsp;Abha Darnal ,&nbsp;David Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Stepped care offers patients the least intensive intervention required for their mental health needs, with advancements to more intensive treatments as necessary. This umbrella review synthesized existing <em>meta</em>-analyses on the effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for published <em>meta</em>-analyses on the effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders since the databases’ inception until August 2023. Protocol was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42023461710) and followed the JBI umbrella review methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten systematic reviews incorporating 38 primary studies on depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder were the source of data. In spite of the different models of stepped care, the treatment appeared to improve depression response (3–6 months RR = 1.52 [1.30, 1.78]; I<sup>2</sup> = 74 %, N = 14. 9–12 months RR = 1.47 [1.23, 1.77], I<sup>2</sup> = 80 %, N = 13) and remission rate (4–6 months RR = 1.57 [1.30, 1.90]; I<sup>2</sup> = 79 %, N = 14. 12 months RR = 1.60 [1.23, 2.07]; I<sup>2</sup> = 94 %, N = 13) as well as anxiety (post-treatment SMD = −0.29 [−0.48, −0.10]; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %, N = 3. 12 months SMD = −0.57 [−0.53, −0.06]; I<sup>2</sup> = 37 %, N = 2).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Systematic reviews without <em>meta</em>-analyses and reviews published in languages other than English were not accounted for in this umbrella review.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results support the implementation of stepped care, particularly for the pooled effectiveness in depression treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stepped care offers patients the least intensive intervention required for their mental health needs, with advancements to more intensive treatments as necessary. This umbrella review synthesized existing meta-analyses on the effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for published meta-analyses on the effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders since the databases’ inception until August 2023. Protocol was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42023461710) and followed the JBI umbrella review methodology.

Results

Ten systematic reviews incorporating 38 primary studies on depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder were the source of data. In spite of the different models of stepped care, the treatment appeared to improve depression response (3–6 months RR = 1.52 [1.30, 1.78]; I2 = 74 %, N = 14. 9–12 months RR = 1.47 [1.23, 1.77], I2 = 80 %, N = 13) and remission rate (4–6 months RR = 1.57 [1.30, 1.90]; I2 = 79 %, N = 14. 12 months RR = 1.60 [1.23, 2.07]; I2 = 94 %, N = 13) as well as anxiety (post-treatment SMD = −0.29 [−0.48, −0.10]; I2 = 0 %, N = 3. 12 months SMD = −0.57 [−0.53, −0.06]; I2 = 37 %, N = 2).

Limitations

Systematic reviews without meta-analyses and reviews published in languages other than English were not accounted for in this umbrella review.

Conclusions

Our results support the implementation of stepped care, particularly for the pooled effectiveness in depression treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神障碍阶梯护理的有效性:荟萃分析综述
背景阶梯式护理为患者提供了满足其心理健康需求所需的强度最低的干预措施,并在必要时提供强度更高的治疗。本综述综合了现有的有关精神疾病阶梯式护理有效性的荟萃分析。方法系统地检索了自数据库建立以来至2023年8月发表的有关精神疾病阶梯式护理有效性的荟萃分析,包括PubMed、Embase、Web of Science Core Collection和PsycINFO。研究协议已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023461710)进行了预先登记,并遵循了 JBI 的总括综述方法。结果数据来源于十篇系统综述,其中包含 38 项关于抑郁症、焦虑症和创伤后应激障碍的主要研究。尽管阶梯式护理的模式各不相同,但治疗似乎改善了抑郁反应(3-6 个月 RR = 1.52 [1.30, 1.78];I2 = 74 %,N = 14;9-12 个月 RR = 1.47 [1.30, 1.78];I2 = 74 %,N = 14)。9-12 个月 RR = 1.47 [1.23, 1.77]; I2 = 80 %, N = 13)和缓解率(4-6 个月 RR = 1.57 [1.30, 1.90]; I2 = 79 %, N = 14.12个月RR = 1.60 [1.23, 2.07];I2 = 94 %,N = 13)以及焦虑(治疗后SMD = -0.29 [-0.48, -0.10];I2 = 0 %,N = 3;12个月SMD = -0.57 [-0.53, -0.06];I2 = 37 %,N = 2)。局限性本综述未考虑未进行荟萃分析的系统综述和以英语以外语言发表的综述。结论我们的结果支持实施阶梯式护理,尤其是对抑郁症治疗的综合疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1