Comparison of pelvic floor morphometry in supine and standing in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: A cross-sectional exploratory study

Lori B. Forner , Marie-Pierre Cyr , Emma M. Beckman , Paul W. Hodges , Michelle D. Smith
{"title":"Comparison of pelvic floor morphometry in supine and standing in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: A cross-sectional exploratory study","authors":"Lori B. Forner ,&nbsp;Marie-Pierre Cyr ,&nbsp;Emma M. Beckman ,&nbsp;Paul W. Hodges ,&nbsp;Michelle D. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2024.101708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><div>Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and gravity may both challenge pelvic organ support and contribute to the development or worsening of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study aimed to assess whether pelvic floor morphometry differs between supine and standing positions in women with and without POP, at rest and with elevated IAP, and to compare the change in measures from the supine to standing position between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Thirty premenopausal vaginally parous women with (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>15</mn></mrow></math></span>) and without (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>15</mn></mrow></math></span>) POP were included. Transperineal ultrasound was used to assess pelvic floor morphometry (bladder neck [BN], rectal ampulla [RA], levator plate angle [LPA], anorectal angle [ARA], levator anteroposterior distance [LAP], and levator hiatal area [LHA]) in supine and standing, at rest and bearing down. Measures were compared between positions (supine and standing) and groups (women with and without POP).</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>At rest, BN and RA were lower and LPA was smaller in standing than supine for all participants (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>04</mn></mrow></math></span>), and LHA and LAP distance were greater in standing than supine for women with POP (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>). In standing rest, BN and RA were lower and LHA was greater in women with than without POP (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>). There were no differences between women with and without POP in these measures in supine (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&gt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>23</mn></mrow></math></span>). ARA was greater in women with POP than without POP in both positions at rest (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>002</mn></mrow></math></span>). During bearing down, BN and RA were lower, ARA and LPA were smaller, and LHA and LAP distance were larger in standing than in supine for all participants (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>023</mn></mrow></math></span>). In bearing down in both positions, BN and RA were lower and ARA and LHA were greater in women with than without POP (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>013</mn></mrow></math></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Our findings indicate lower pelvic floor support in women with POP compared to women without POP that is evident during bearing down in supine, and at rest and during bearing down in standing. These findings underscore the utility of transperineal ultrasound to assess pelvic floor morphometry in standing to guide management of women with POP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973724006416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and gravity may both challenge pelvic organ support and contribute to the development or worsening of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study aimed to assess whether pelvic floor morphometry differs between supine and standing positions in women with and without POP, at rest and with elevated IAP, and to compare the change in measures from the supine to standing position between groups.

Methods:

Thirty premenopausal vaginally parous women with (n=15) and without (n=15) POP were included. Transperineal ultrasound was used to assess pelvic floor morphometry (bladder neck [BN], rectal ampulla [RA], levator plate angle [LPA], anorectal angle [ARA], levator anteroposterior distance [LAP], and levator hiatal area [LHA]) in supine and standing, at rest and bearing down. Measures were compared between positions (supine and standing) and groups (women with and without POP).

Results:

At rest, BN and RA were lower and LPA was smaller in standing than supine for all participants (all p<0.04), and LHA and LAP distance were greater in standing than supine for women with POP (p<0.001). In standing rest, BN and RA were lower and LHA was greater in women with than without POP (p<0.001). There were no differences between women with and without POP in these measures in supine (all p>0.23). ARA was greater in women with POP than without POP in both positions at rest (p=0.002). During bearing down, BN and RA were lower, ARA and LPA were smaller, and LHA and LAP distance were larger in standing than in supine for all participants (all p<0.023). In bearing down in both positions, BN and RA were lower and ARA and LHA were greater in women with than without POP (all p=0.013).

Conclusion:

Our findings indicate lower pelvic floor support in women with POP compared to women without POP that is evident during bearing down in supine, and at rest and during bearing down in standing. These findings underscore the utility of transperineal ultrasound to assess pelvic floor morphometry in standing to guide management of women with POP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有和未患有盆腔器官脱垂的妇女仰卧和站立时盆底形态测量的比较:一项横断面探索性研究
导言:腹内压(IAP)和重力都可能对盆腔器官的支撑造成挑战,并导致盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的发生或恶化。本研究旨在评估患有和未患有 POP 的女性在静息和 IAP 升高时,仰卧位和站立位的盆底形态测量是否存在差异,并比较不同组别从仰卧位到站立位的测量变化。采用经会阴超声评估仰卧位和站立位、静止位和下蹲位的盆底形态测量(膀胱颈[BN]、直肠安瓿[RA]、提肌板角[LPA]、肛直肠角[ARA]、提肌前间距[LAP]和提肌间隙面积[LHA])。结果:所有参与者在静息时,站立时的 BN 和 RA 比仰卧时低,LPA 比仰卧时小(所有 p<0.04),患有 POP 的妇女站立时的 LHA 和 LAP 距离比仰卧时大(p<0.001)。在站立休息时,患 POP 的妇女的 BN 和 RA 比未患 POP 的妇女低,LHA 比未患 POP 的妇女高(p<0.001)。患有和未患有 POP 的妇女在仰卧位时在这些指标上没有差异(均为 p>0.23)。患有 POP 的妇女在静息时的两种体位下的 ARA 均大于未患 POP 的妇女(p=0.002)。与仰卧位相比,所有参与者在下蹲时,站立时的 BN 和 RA 更低、ARA 和 LPA 更小、LHA 和 LAP 距离更大(所有 p<0.023)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与未患 POP 的女性相比,患 POP 的女性盆底支持力较低,这在仰卧位、静息时和站立时都很明显。这些发现强调了经会阴超声评估站立时骨盆底形态的实用性,可为POP妇女的治疗提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
A database structure for urodynamic records Vaginal LASER and estrogen comparison in Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause Short and long-term clinical results of a minimally invasive syringe adapter for catheter free instillation of intravesical treatments Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA outcomes for overactive bladder in older adults The many facets of perceived bladder health in women: Absence of symptoms and presence of healthy behaviors across the life course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1