Lori B. Forner , Marie-Pierre Cyr , Emma M. Beckman , Paul W. Hodges , Michelle D. Smith
{"title":"Comparison of pelvic floor morphometry in supine and standing in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: A cross-sectional exploratory study","authors":"Lori B. Forner , Marie-Pierre Cyr , Emma M. Beckman , Paul W. Hodges , Michelle D. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2024.101708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><div>Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and gravity may both challenge pelvic organ support and contribute to the development or worsening of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study aimed to assess whether pelvic floor morphometry differs between supine and standing positions in women with and without POP, at rest and with elevated IAP, and to compare the change in measures from the supine to standing position between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Thirty premenopausal vaginally parous women with (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>15</mn></mrow></math></span>) and without (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>15</mn></mrow></math></span>) POP were included. Transperineal ultrasound was used to assess pelvic floor morphometry (bladder neck [BN], rectal ampulla [RA], levator plate angle [LPA], anorectal angle [ARA], levator anteroposterior distance [LAP], and levator hiatal area [LHA]) in supine and standing, at rest and bearing down. Measures were compared between positions (supine and standing) and groups (women with and without POP).</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>At rest, BN and RA were lower and LPA was smaller in standing than supine for all participants (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>04</mn></mrow></math></span>), and LHA and LAP distance were greater in standing than supine for women with POP (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>). In standing rest, BN and RA were lower and LHA was greater in women with than without POP (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>). There were no differences between women with and without POP in these measures in supine (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>></mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>23</mn></mrow></math></span>). ARA was greater in women with POP than without POP in both positions at rest (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>002</mn></mrow></math></span>). During bearing down, BN and RA were lower, ARA and LPA were smaller, and LHA and LAP distance were larger in standing than in supine for all participants (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>023</mn></mrow></math></span>). In bearing down in both positions, BN and RA were lower and ARA and LHA were greater in women with than without POP (all <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>013</mn></mrow></math></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Our findings indicate lower pelvic floor support in women with POP compared to women without POP that is evident during bearing down in supine, and at rest and during bearing down in standing. These findings underscore the utility of transperineal ultrasound to assess pelvic floor morphometry in standing to guide management of women with POP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973724006416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction:
Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and gravity may both challenge pelvic organ support and contribute to the development or worsening of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study aimed to assess whether pelvic floor morphometry differs between supine and standing positions in women with and without POP, at rest and with elevated IAP, and to compare the change in measures from the supine to standing position between groups.
Methods:
Thirty premenopausal vaginally parous women with () and without () POP were included. Transperineal ultrasound was used to assess pelvic floor morphometry (bladder neck [BN], rectal ampulla [RA], levator plate angle [LPA], anorectal angle [ARA], levator anteroposterior distance [LAP], and levator hiatal area [LHA]) in supine and standing, at rest and bearing down. Measures were compared between positions (supine and standing) and groups (women with and without POP).
Results:
At rest, BN and RA were lower and LPA was smaller in standing than supine for all participants (all ), and LHA and LAP distance were greater in standing than supine for women with POP (). In standing rest, BN and RA were lower and LHA was greater in women with than without POP (). There were no differences between women with and without POP in these measures in supine (all ). ARA was greater in women with POP than without POP in both positions at rest (). During bearing down, BN and RA were lower, ARA and LPA were smaller, and LHA and LAP distance were larger in standing than in supine for all participants (all ). In bearing down in both positions, BN and RA were lower and ARA and LHA were greater in women with than without POP (all ).
Conclusion:
Our findings indicate lower pelvic floor support in women with POP compared to women without POP that is evident during bearing down in supine, and at rest and during bearing down in standing. These findings underscore the utility of transperineal ultrasound to assess pelvic floor morphometry in standing to guide management of women with POP.
导言:腹内压(IAP)和重力都可能对盆腔器官的支撑造成挑战,并导致盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的发生或恶化。本研究旨在评估患有和未患有 POP 的女性在静息和 IAP 升高时,仰卧位和站立位的盆底形态测量是否存在差异,并比较不同组别从仰卧位到站立位的测量变化。采用经会阴超声评估仰卧位和站立位、静止位和下蹲位的盆底形态测量(膀胱颈[BN]、直肠安瓿[RA]、提肌板角[LPA]、肛直肠角[ARA]、提肌前间距[LAP]和提肌间隙面积[LHA])。结果:所有参与者在静息时,站立时的 BN 和 RA 比仰卧时低,LPA 比仰卧时小(所有 p<0.04),患有 POP 的妇女站立时的 LHA 和 LAP 距离比仰卧时大(p<0.001)。在站立休息时,患 POP 的妇女的 BN 和 RA 比未患 POP 的妇女低,LHA 比未患 POP 的妇女高(p<0.001)。患有和未患有 POP 的妇女在仰卧位时在这些指标上没有差异(均为 p>0.23)。患有 POP 的妇女在静息时的两种体位下的 ARA 均大于未患 POP 的妇女(p=0.002)。与仰卧位相比,所有参与者在下蹲时,站立时的 BN 和 RA 更低、ARA 和 LPA 更小、LHA 和 LAP 距离更大(所有 p<0.023)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与未患 POP 的女性相比,患 POP 的女性盆底支持力较低,这在仰卧位、静息时和站立时都很明显。这些发现强调了经会阴超声评估站立时骨盆底形态的实用性,可为POP妇女的治疗提供指导。