Empowering EFL writing through digital storytelling: A quasi-experimental assessment of CALF measures and multidimensional engagement

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104564
Zahra Fakher Ajabshir
{"title":"Empowering EFL writing through digital storytelling: A quasi-experimental assessment of CALF measures and multidimensional engagement","authors":"Zahra Fakher Ajabshir","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This mixed-methods study aims to investigate the impact of traditional and digital storytelling (DST) on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' writing performance in terms of complexity, accuracy, lexical diversity, and fluency (CALF) measures. Moreover, the study sheds light on how learners were engaged along behavioral, cognitive, affective, and agentive dimensions when completing the DST task. The participants were 45 intermediate-level college students who were assigned to the DST and traditional storytelling (TST) groups. Under a four-week curriculum, the participants constructed their stories by using either an online platform or traditional pen-and-paper format. Adopting a quasi-experiment design, within-group and between-group comparisons were made. A series of paired samples <em>t</em>-tests were run to compare the pretest and post-test of each group (within-group comparison) and assessed any improvement from the pretest to the post-test across CALF measures. Also, a 2 × 2 mixed-methods analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run on the post-test scores of the two groups across CALF measures (between-group comparisons). The results of these tests unveiled that the storytelling task, in either traditional or digital mode, effectively enhanced students' overall writing performance. However, there was a significant impact of DST on syntactic complexity, accuracy, and lexical diversity, while writing fluency remained unaffected. Moreover, the results of the questionnaire and interview data revealed the students' multidimensional engagement (behavioral, cognitive, affective, and agentive) while performing the DST task, with the agentive aspect emerging as most prominent. Pedagogical implications of incorporating DST in EFL contexts were discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed-methods study aims to investigate the impact of traditional and digital storytelling (DST) on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' writing performance in terms of complexity, accuracy, lexical diversity, and fluency (CALF) measures. Moreover, the study sheds light on how learners were engaged along behavioral, cognitive, affective, and agentive dimensions when completing the DST task. The participants were 45 intermediate-level college students who were assigned to the DST and traditional storytelling (TST) groups. Under a four-week curriculum, the participants constructed their stories by using either an online platform or traditional pen-and-paper format. Adopting a quasi-experiment design, within-group and between-group comparisons were made. A series of paired samples t-tests were run to compare the pretest and post-test of each group (within-group comparison) and assessed any improvement from the pretest to the post-test across CALF measures. Also, a 2 × 2 mixed-methods analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run on the post-test scores of the two groups across CALF measures (between-group comparisons). The results of these tests unveiled that the storytelling task, in either traditional or digital mode, effectively enhanced students' overall writing performance. However, there was a significant impact of DST on syntactic complexity, accuracy, and lexical diversity, while writing fluency remained unaffected. Moreover, the results of the questionnaire and interview data revealed the students' multidimensional engagement (behavioral, cognitive, affective, and agentive) while performing the DST task, with the agentive aspect emerging as most prominent. Pedagogical implications of incorporating DST in EFL contexts were discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过数字故事增强英语写作能力:CALF 测量和多维参与的准实验评估
本混合方法研究旨在从复杂性、准确性、词汇多样性和流畅性(CALF)等方面,探讨传统和数字讲故事(DST)对英语作为外语(EFL)学习者写作成绩的影响。此外,本研究还揭示了学习者在完成 DST 任务时如何从行为、认知、情感和代理等维度参与其中。研究对象是 45 名中级水平的大学生,他们被分配到 DST 组和传统讲故事(TST)组。在为期四周的课程中,受试者通过网络平台或传统的纸笔形式构建自己的故事。采用准实验设计,进行组内和组间比较。通过一系列配对样本 t 检验,比较了各组的前测和后测(组内比较),并评估了 CALF 各项指标从前测到后测的改善情况。此外,还对两组在 CALF 各项指标上的测试后得分进行了 2 × 2 混合方法方差分析(组间比较)。测试结果表明,无论是传统模式还是数字模式的讲故事任务,都有效地提高了学生的整体写作水平。然而,DST 对句法复杂性、准确性和词汇多样性有显著影响,而写作流畅性则不受影响。此外,问卷调查和访谈数据结果显示,学生在完成 DST 任务时表现出多维度的参与(行为、认知、情感和代理),其中代理方面最为突出。讨论了将 DST 纳入 EFL 环境的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1