Effects of probiotics and fibers on markers of nephropathy, inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction in individuals with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria. The ProFOS Study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of diabetes and its complications Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108892
{"title":"Effects of probiotics and fibers on markers of nephropathy, inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction in individuals with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria. The ProFOS Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To estimate whether a mix of pre- and probiotics would strengthen the gut barrier and protect the kidneys in individuals with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Forty-one participants received synbiotic (pre- and probiotics) mix or placebo for 12 weeks with 6 weeks washout. Primary endpoint was change from baseline to end-of-period in UACR. Secondary endpoints were changes in endothelial glycocalyx thickness, inflammatory and intestinal barrier dysfunction markers, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and ambulatory systolic blood pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-five participants completed the study. Mean age was 58 (SD 10) years, 73 % (<em>n</em> = 30) were male, median UACR was 134 (IQR 63–293) mg/g, estimated GFR was 75 (30) ml/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>. There was no significant difference in UACR with a mean relative change (CI 95 %) from baseline to end-of-treatment of −3.0 (−18.4; 15.5) % in the synbiotic group and −12.0 (−29.6; 9.6) % in the placebo group with no significant difference between treatment periods (9.37 (−25.2; 44.0) percentage points; <em>p</em> = 0.60). No significant beneficial difference in the secondary end points was demonstrated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Twelve weeks treatment with synbiotic mix had no effect on UACR or on any of the secondary endpoints in subjects with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056872724002186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To estimate whether a mix of pre- and probiotics would strengthen the gut barrier and protect the kidneys in individuals with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria.

Methods

Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Forty-one participants received synbiotic (pre- and probiotics) mix or placebo for 12 weeks with 6 weeks washout. Primary endpoint was change from baseline to end-of-period in UACR. Secondary endpoints were changes in endothelial glycocalyx thickness, inflammatory and intestinal barrier dysfunction markers, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and ambulatory systolic blood pressure.

Results

Thirty-five participants completed the study. Mean age was 58 (SD 10) years, 73 % (n = 30) were male, median UACR was 134 (IQR 63–293) mg/g, estimated GFR was 75 (30) ml/min/1.73m2. There was no significant difference in UACR with a mean relative change (CI 95 %) from baseline to end-of-treatment of −3.0 (−18.4; 15.5) % in the synbiotic group and −12.0 (−29.6; 9.6) % in the placebo group with no significant difference between treatment periods (9.37 (−25.2; 44.0) percentage points; p = 0.60). No significant beneficial difference in the secondary end points was demonstrated.

Conclusion

Twelve weeks treatment with synbiotic mix had no effect on UACR or on any of the secondary endpoints in subjects with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌和纤维对 1 型糖尿病和白蛋白尿患者肾病、炎症、肠屏障功能障碍和内皮功能障碍指标的影响。ProFOS 研究
方法随机、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。41 名参与者接受合生元(前体和益生菌)混合物或安慰剂治疗,为期 12 周,其中 6 周为冲洗期。主要终点是 UACR 从基线到期末的变化。次要终点是内皮糖萼厚度、炎症和肠屏障功能障碍标志物、肾小球滤过率(GFR)和非卧床收缩压的变化。平均年龄为 58 (SD 10) 岁,73%(n = 30)为男性,UACR 中位数为 134 (IQR 63-293) mg/g,估计 GFR 为 75 (30) ml/min/1.73m2。从基线到治疗结束,合生元组 UACR 的平均相对变化(CI 95 %)为 -3.0 (-18.4; 15.5) %,安慰剂组为 -12.0 (-29.6; 9.6) %,治疗期间无明显差异(9.37 (-25.2; 44.0) 个百分点;P = 0.60)。结论对患有白蛋白尿的 1 型糖尿病患者来说,使用合生元组合进行为期 12 周的治疗对 UACR 或任何次要终点均无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of diabetes and its complications
Journal of diabetes and its complications 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications (JDC) is a journal for health care practitioners and researchers, that publishes original research about the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. JDC also publishes articles on physiological and molecular aspects of glucose homeostasis. The primary purpose of JDC is to act as a source of information usable by diabetes practitioners and researchers to increase their knowledge about mechanisms of diabetes and complications development, and promote better management of people with diabetes who are at risk for those complications. Manuscripts submitted to JDC can report any aspect of basic, translational or clinical research as well as epidemiology. Topics can range broadly from early prediabetes to late-stage complicated diabetes. Topics relevant to basic/translational reports include pancreatic islet dysfunction and insulin resistance, altered adipose tissue function in diabetes, altered neuronal control of glucose homeostasis and mechanisms of drug action. Topics relevant to diabetic complications include diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy; peripheral vascular disease and coronary heart disease; gastrointestinal disorders, renal failure and impotence; and hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
期刊最新文献
Clinical features and outcomes of patients diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) who were hospitalized for conditions outside of internal medicine Pioglitazone increases risk of ischemic heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin Effects of probiotics and fibers on markers of nephropathy, inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction in individuals with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria. The ProFOS Study Precision diabetology: Where do we stand now? Effects of moderate-intensity aerobic training on cardiac structure and function in type 2 mellitus diabetic rats: Based on echocardiography and speckle tracking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1