Glenoid wear and migration pattern of a humeral head resurfacing implant: a prospective study using radio stereometric analysis

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.012
Michael Axenhus MD, PhD, Magnus Ödquist MD, PhD, Hassan Abbaszadegan MD, PhD, Olof Sköldenberg MD, PhD, Björn Salomonsson MD, PhD
{"title":"Glenoid wear and migration pattern of a humeral head resurfacing implant: a prospective study using radio stereometric analysis","authors":"Michael Axenhus MD, PhD,&nbsp;Magnus Ödquist MD, PhD,&nbsp;Hassan Abbaszadegan MD, PhD,&nbsp;Olof Sköldenberg MD, PhD,&nbsp;Björn Salomonsson MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty (HHR) is normally used as a hemi shoulder arthroplasty and has been in use for the treatment of Gleno-Humeral osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder for more than 30 years. Some studies, however, shows that anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty provides better improvement in function than a HHR for patients with OA. Reasons for this may be a progressive glenoid wear (GW) or loosening of the HHR. We, therefore, wanted to investigate the migration pattern of the HHR and also GW by using radio stereometric analysis (RSA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>21 patients (21 shoulders) with OA and a mean age of 64 years were enrolled in the study. They all received the Copeland humeral resurfacing head and were followed for 2 years with RSA. We evaluated the clinical outcome at 2 years with Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS), EuroQol 5 dimension 3L and Constant Shoulder Score. In addition, we assessed data on WOOS and revisions until 5 years follow-up by using the local clinic data within the Swedish Shoulder Arthroplasty Register.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After an initial migration at two months the implants were stable in relation to the humerus with no statistically significant difference between the 2 months and the 2 years value (<em>P</em> = .23). The GW continued to increase during the study period with an initial migration of mean 2.3 mm and at 2 years 3.5 mm with a statistically difference between the 6 months and 2 years value (<em>P</em> = .046). The WOOS, EuroQol 5 dimension 3L and Constant Shoulder Score were all improved at 2 years compared to the preoperative values. We found a weak correlation between GW at 2 years and the WOOS score at 2 and 5 years, but these did not reach statistical significance. There were 4 revisions within 5 years after the primary operation, all due to pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The marker-free RSA can be used in clinical studies for assessing migration in HHR implants and was also for the first time used to measure GW. The Copeland HHR seems to obtain a secure fixation in the humerus but shows continuous GW up to two years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty (HHR) is normally used as a hemi shoulder arthroplasty and has been in use for the treatment of Gleno-Humeral osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder for more than 30 years. Some studies, however, shows that anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty provides better improvement in function than a HHR for patients with OA. Reasons for this may be a progressive glenoid wear (GW) or loosening of the HHR. We, therefore, wanted to investigate the migration pattern of the HHR and also GW by using radio stereometric analysis (RSA).

Methods

21 patients (21 shoulders) with OA and a mean age of 64 years were enrolled in the study. They all received the Copeland humeral resurfacing head and were followed for 2 years with RSA. We evaluated the clinical outcome at 2 years with Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS), EuroQol 5 dimension 3L and Constant Shoulder Score. In addition, we assessed data on WOOS and revisions until 5 years follow-up by using the local clinic data within the Swedish Shoulder Arthroplasty Register.

Results

After an initial migration at two months the implants were stable in relation to the humerus with no statistically significant difference between the 2 months and the 2 years value (P = .23). The GW continued to increase during the study period with an initial migration of mean 2.3 mm and at 2 years 3.5 mm with a statistically difference between the 6 months and 2 years value (P = .046). The WOOS, EuroQol 5 dimension 3L and Constant Shoulder Score were all improved at 2 years compared to the preoperative values. We found a weak correlation between GW at 2 years and the WOOS score at 2 and 5 years, but these did not reach statistical significance. There were 4 revisions within 5 years after the primary operation, all due to pain.

Conclusion

The marker-free RSA can be used in clinical studies for assessing migration in HHR implants and was also for the first time used to measure GW. The Copeland HHR seems to obtain a secure fixation in the humerus but shows continuous GW up to two years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盂磨损和肱骨头再植植入物的移位模式:利用无线电立体计量分析进行的前瞻性研究
背景肱骨头再植关节成形术(HHR)通常作为半肩关节成形术使用,用于治疗肩关节盂-肱骨骨关节炎(OA)已有 30 多年的历史。然而,一些研究表明,解剖型全肩关节置换术比半肩关节置换术能更好地改善 OA 患者的功能。究其原因,可能是髋臼盂逐渐磨损(GW)或髋关节置换术松动。因此,我们希望通过无线电立体测量分析(RSA)来研究肱骨柄的迁移模式以及盂状关节的磨损。他们都接受了谷轮肱骨再植头治疗,并接受了为期 2 年的 RSA 随访。我们通过西安大略省肩关节骨性关节炎(WOOS)、EuroQol 5 维 3L 和恒定肩关节评分来评估 2 年后的临床疗效。此外,我们还通过瑞典肩关节置换术登记册中的当地诊所数据,评估了随访5年的WOOS和翻修数据。结果在2个月的初始移位后,植入物与肱骨的关系稳定,2个月和2年的值差异无统计学意义(P = .23)。在研究期间,GW持续上升,最初平均移位2.3毫米,2年后移位3.5毫米,6个月和2年后的值之间存在统计学差异(P = .046)。与术前相比,2 年后的 WOOS、EuroQol 5 维 3L 和恒定肩关节评分均有所改善。我们发现,2 年后的 GW 值与 2 年和 5 年后的 WOOS 评分之间存在微弱的相关性,但未达到统计学意义。结论无标记 RSA 可用于临床研究,以评估 HHR 种植体的移位情况,也是首次用于测量 GW。谷轮 HHR 似乎能在肱骨中获得安全的固定,但在两年内会出现持续的 GW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
PSI Seems Mandatory For Accurate Placement Of Glenoid Component Only For Glenoid Retroversion Over 20° The Lateral Para-Olecranon Approach For Fixation Of Complex Coronal Shear Fractures Of The Distal Humerus Coronoid Height Index: A Tool To Identify The Threshold For Surgical Fixation In Apical And Anteromedial Coronoid Fractures ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN ELBOW PROSTHETIC SURGERY IN SWEDEN Concordance Of Three Different Methods To Obtain Samples For Culture In Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. A Prospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1