Full robustness-based decision-making computational approach for RC structures subjected to multiple hazards

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107638
Mengxue Guo , Hua Huang , Kai Qian , Bin Wang , Chunliang Xue , Min Huang
{"title":"Full robustness-based decision-making computational approach for RC structures subjected to multiple hazards","authors":"Mengxue Guo ,&nbsp;Hua Huang ,&nbsp;Kai Qian ,&nbsp;Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Chunliang Xue ,&nbsp;Min Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing RC structures show accidental loadings vulnerabilities because of inadequate design detailing causing in premature failure. The installation of a certain reinforcement measure on the susceptible structure is a common option to mitigate these fragility. At this time, reinforcement measures aided by the participation of stakeholders are crucial to combat multiple hazards. However, previous studies did not necessarily dealt with the integration multi-hazard loss, multi-uncertainty, and dependence configuration in a performance-based engineering decision-making framework, to retrofit selection from the robustness of structures perspective. In this paper, an efficient fuzzy full robustness-based decision-making framework is proposed to tackle the challenge of integration of multi-uncertainty and dependence, and further to avoid biased strategies. This framework contained Probabilistic Multi-hazards Fuzzy Global Vulnerability (PMFGV), Loss (PMFGL), and Robustness Assessment (PMFRA) for structures, by incorporating the fuzzy theory and Vine-Copula tree structure. The mentioned robustness index can be used as a reference indicator in the rehabilitation and retrofitting planning. The PMFRA-based making-decision methodology is applied to RC structures with three design schemes, which were established the platform OpenSEEsPy. Results confirm that the established assessment framework is effective in evaluating actual RC structures’ robustness. The fuzzy full robustness index for the frame S-RC, SS-RC, and RS-RC, was &lt; 0.327, 0.421, 0.470 &gt; , &lt; 0.400, 0.503, 0.523 &gt; , &lt; 0.356, 0.453, 0.507 &gt; , respectively. Whether the robustness-cost-based or the Cumulative Prospect Theory-based, the robustness of the reinforcement strategy with the installation of secondary beam (SS-RC) outdistance that of the additional reinforcement ratio (RS-RC). Such parameters are suggested as reasonable and meaningful making-decision index for selecting the optimal retrofitting schemes for structures subjected to multiple hazards, which leads to a balance between the enhancement of full robustness and reduction of life cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 107638"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424017910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing RC structures show accidental loadings vulnerabilities because of inadequate design detailing causing in premature failure. The installation of a certain reinforcement measure on the susceptible structure is a common option to mitigate these fragility. At this time, reinforcement measures aided by the participation of stakeholders are crucial to combat multiple hazards. However, previous studies did not necessarily dealt with the integration multi-hazard loss, multi-uncertainty, and dependence configuration in a performance-based engineering decision-making framework, to retrofit selection from the robustness of structures perspective. In this paper, an efficient fuzzy full robustness-based decision-making framework is proposed to tackle the challenge of integration of multi-uncertainty and dependence, and further to avoid biased strategies. This framework contained Probabilistic Multi-hazards Fuzzy Global Vulnerability (PMFGV), Loss (PMFGL), and Robustness Assessment (PMFRA) for structures, by incorporating the fuzzy theory and Vine-Copula tree structure. The mentioned robustness index can be used as a reference indicator in the rehabilitation and retrofitting planning. The PMFRA-based making-decision methodology is applied to RC structures with three design schemes, which were established the platform OpenSEEsPy. Results confirm that the established assessment framework is effective in evaluating actual RC structures’ robustness. The fuzzy full robustness index for the frame S-RC, SS-RC, and RS-RC, was < 0.327, 0.421, 0.470 > , < 0.400, 0.503, 0.523 > , < 0.356, 0.453, 0.507 > , respectively. Whether the robustness-cost-based or the Cumulative Prospect Theory-based, the robustness of the reinforcement strategy with the installation of secondary beam (SS-RC) outdistance that of the additional reinforcement ratio (RS-RC). Such parameters are suggested as reasonable and meaningful making-decision index for selecting the optimal retrofitting schemes for structures subjected to multiple hazards, which leads to a balance between the enhancement of full robustness and reduction of life cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于鲁棒性的全决策计算方法,适用于受多重危险影响的钢筋混凝土结构
由于设计细节不足,现有的 RC 结构在意外荷载作用下表现出脆弱性,导致过早失效。在易受影响的结构上安装一定的加固措施是缓解这些脆弱性的常见选择。目前,利益相关者参与的加固措施对于应对多重危害至关重要。然而,以往的研究并不一定涉及在基于性能的工程决策框架中整合多重灾害损失、多重不确定性和依赖性配置,以便从结构稳健性的角度进行加固选择。本文提出了一个高效的基于鲁棒性的模糊全决策框架,以解决整合多不确定性和依赖性的难题,并进一步避免策略偏差。该框架结合了模糊理论和 Vine-Copula 树结构,包含了结构的概率多灾害模糊全局脆弱性(PMFGV)、损失(PMFGL)和鲁棒性评估(PMFRA)。上述鲁棒性指数可作为修复和改造规划的参考指标。基于 PMFRA 的决策方法适用于三种设计方案的 RC 结构,这些方案是在 OpenSEEsPy 平台上建立的。结果证实,所建立的评估框架能有效评估实际 RC 结构的鲁棒性。框架 S-RC、SS-RC 和 RS-RC 的模糊全鲁棒性指数分别为 < 0.327、0.421、0.470 > 、 < 0.400、0.503、0.523 > 、 < 0.356、0.453、0.507 > 。无论是基于稳健性成本理论还是基于累积前景理论,加装次梁的加固策略(SS-RC)的稳健性都优于附加配筋率(RS-RC)。建议将这些参数作为合理且有意义的决策指标,用于选择受多重危险影响的结构的最佳加固方案,从而在增强全面稳健性和降低寿命成本之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Numerical simulation of strengthening/deterioration and damage development of cementitious materials under sulfate attack environment Computer vision-based substructure isolation method for localized damage identification Machine learning-based prediction of seismic response of elevated steel tanks Multivariate risk assessment for offshore structures by Gaidai risk evaluation method under an accumulation of fatigue damage, utilizing novel deconvolution scheme Repairing thermally shocked reinforced concrete beams using innovative CFRP sheets anchorage systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1