Study on the optimal thickness ratio of steel-aramid composite structure against local explosion

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107657
Zhen Gao , Yeqing Chen , Zhenqing Wang , Shutao Li , Shang Ma , Jiazheng Gao , Zhenzhen Xu
{"title":"Study on the optimal thickness ratio of steel-aramid composite structure against local explosion","authors":"Zhen Gao ,&nbsp;Yeqing Chen ,&nbsp;Zhenqing Wang ,&nbsp;Shutao Li ,&nbsp;Shang Ma ,&nbsp;Jiazheng Gao ,&nbsp;Zhenzhen Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies of the steel-aramid anti-explosion structure have not dealt with the optimal thickness ratio of the steel and the aramid layers. In this paper, the damage mechanism of aramid-steel composite (ASCTs) target plate with single layer and multiple structural configurations under local explosion load is studied by experimental and numerical simulation methods. The influence of different thickness combinations on the anti-explosion performance of aramid composite structure was compared, and the thickness combination mode with the best cost performance was analyzed. The optimal structure anti-explosion design scheme was obtained by using the optimization method. The optimal thickness ratio has been analyzed, and the optimal anti-explosion structure design has been given. Experimental results show that at the same proportional blast distance (200 g TNT), the Q235 steel-aramid laminate target suffered no structural failure and its centre deflection was 10 % less than single-layer steel (S-1). The same thickness steel sheet (S-2) without the aramid laminate failed to perform as expected. The numerical simulation results show that at a proportional blast distance of 0.16 m/kg<sup>1/3</sup>, the best blast protection thickness ratio of the Q235 steel-aramid protective structure is 2.6:9.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 107657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424018101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies of the steel-aramid anti-explosion structure have not dealt with the optimal thickness ratio of the steel and the aramid layers. In this paper, the damage mechanism of aramid-steel composite (ASCTs) target plate with single layer and multiple structural configurations under local explosion load is studied by experimental and numerical simulation methods. The influence of different thickness combinations on the anti-explosion performance of aramid composite structure was compared, and the thickness combination mode with the best cost performance was analyzed. The optimal structure anti-explosion design scheme was obtained by using the optimization method. The optimal thickness ratio has been analyzed, and the optimal anti-explosion structure design has been given. Experimental results show that at the same proportional blast distance (200 g TNT), the Q235 steel-aramid laminate target suffered no structural failure and its centre deflection was 10 % less than single-layer steel (S-1). The same thickness steel sheet (S-2) without the aramid laminate failed to perform as expected. The numerical simulation results show that at a proportional blast distance of 0.16 m/kg1/3, the best blast protection thickness ratio of the Q235 steel-aramid protective structure is 2.6:9.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钢-芳纶复合结构抗局部爆炸最佳厚度比研究
以往对钢-芳纶防爆结构的研究并未涉及钢层和芳纶层的最佳厚度比。本文通过实验和数值模拟方法,研究了单层和多层结构配置的芳纶-钢复合材料(ASCTs)靶板在局部爆炸载荷作用下的破坏机理。比较了不同厚度组合对芳纶复合材料结构抗爆性能的影响,分析了性价比最优的厚度组合模式。利用优化方法获得了最优结构防爆设计方案。分析了最佳厚度比,给出了最优防爆结构设计方案。实验结果表明,在相同比例的爆炸距离(200 克 TNT)下,Q235 钢-芳纶层压板靶没有发生结构破坏,其中心挠度比单层钢板(S-1)小 10%。而没有芳纶层压板的同厚度钢板(S-2)则未能达到预期效果。数值模拟结果表明,在 0.16 m/kg1/3 的比例爆炸距离下,Q235 钢-芳纶防护结构的最佳防爆厚度比为 2.6:9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Numerical simulation of strengthening/deterioration and damage development of cementitious materials under sulfate attack environment Computer vision-based substructure isolation method for localized damage identification Machine learning-based prediction of seismic response of elevated steel tanks Multivariate risk assessment for offshore structures by Gaidai risk evaluation method under an accumulation of fatigue damage, utilizing novel deconvolution scheme Repairing thermally shocked reinforced concrete beams using innovative CFRP sheets anchorage systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1