Bidirectional seismic fragility analysis of double-deck viaduct frame piers based on stripe-cloud method

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107597
Cheng-xiang Xu , Jian-tao Deng , Hong-bing Zhu
{"title":"Bidirectional seismic fragility analysis of double-deck viaduct frame piers based on stripe-cloud method","authors":"Cheng-xiang Xu ,&nbsp;Jian-tao Deng ,&nbsp;Hong-bing Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To evaluate the influence of bidirectional seismic action on the seismic fragility of double-deck viaduct fram pier (DVFP), this study employs a vector-valued intensity measure (<em>IM</em>) [<em>PGA</em>, <em>Sa</em> (<em>T</em><sub>1</sub>, 5 %)], in tandem with the stripe-cloud method. The study compares the median values of <em>Sa</em> and the damage probability difference index (<em>DI</em>) to analyze the fragility of DVFP under both unidirectional and bidirectional seismic actions. Additionally, this research investigates the sensitivity of bidirectional seismic fragility of DVFP to the incidence angles. The results indicate a notable decrease in the median <em>Sa</em> values for DVFP are observed under bidirectional seismic action, with decreases of 28.6 %, 24.3 %, 20.9 %, and 18.8 % corresponding to four damage states, as compared to those under unidirectional seismic action, and the corresponding parameter <em>DIs</em> are measured at 0.122, 0.182, 0.245, and 0.291, respectively. Notably, the most severe damage to DVFP occurs when the bidirectional seismic incidence angle is within the range of 120–135°. At this angle, the median <em>Sa</em> values at four damage states are 85.8 %, 86.1 %, 87.6 %, and 88.6 %, respectively, compared to the angle of 0°. Therefore, neglecting the influence of bidirectional seismic incidence angles may lead to an underestimation of the bidirectional seismic fragility of DVFP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424017508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of bidirectional seismic action on the seismic fragility of double-deck viaduct fram pier (DVFP), this study employs a vector-valued intensity measure (IM) [PGA, Sa (T1, 5 %)], in tandem with the stripe-cloud method. The study compares the median values of Sa and the damage probability difference index (DI) to analyze the fragility of DVFP under both unidirectional and bidirectional seismic actions. Additionally, this research investigates the sensitivity of bidirectional seismic fragility of DVFP to the incidence angles. The results indicate a notable decrease in the median Sa values for DVFP are observed under bidirectional seismic action, with decreases of 28.6 %, 24.3 %, 20.9 %, and 18.8 % corresponding to four damage states, as compared to those under unidirectional seismic action, and the corresponding parameter DIs are measured at 0.122, 0.182, 0.245, and 0.291, respectively. Notably, the most severe damage to DVFP occurs when the bidirectional seismic incidence angle is within the range of 120–135°. At this angle, the median Sa values at four damage states are 85.8 %, 86.1 %, 87.6 %, and 88.6 %, respectively, compared to the angle of 0°. Therefore, neglecting the influence of bidirectional seismic incidence angles may lead to an underestimation of the bidirectional seismic fragility of DVFP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于条纹云法的双层高架桥框架墩双向地震脆性分析
为评估双向地震作用对双层高架桥框架墩(DVFP)抗震脆性的影响,本研究采用了矢量值烈度测量(IM)[PGA,Sa (T1, 5 %)],并结合条纹云法。研究比较了 Sa 的中值和破坏概率差异指数 (DI),以分析 DVFP 在单向和双向地震作用下的脆性。此外,该研究还探讨了 DVFP 双向地震脆性对入射角的敏感性。结果表明,在双向地震作用下,DVFP 的中值 Sa 显著下降,与单向地震作用下相比,四种破坏状态的中值 Sa 分别下降了 28.6%、24.3%、20.9% 和 18.8%,相应的参数 DI 分别为 0.122、0.182、0.245 和 0.291。值得注意的是,当双向地震入射角在 120-135° 范围内时,DVFP 受到的破坏最为严重。在该角度下,与 0° 角相比,四种破坏状态下的 Sa 中值分别为 85.8%、86.1%、87.6% 和 88.6%。因此,忽略双向地震入射角的影响可能会导致低估 DVFP 的双向地震脆性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Numerical simulation of strengthening/deterioration and damage development of cementitious materials under sulfate attack environment Computer vision-based substructure isolation method for localized damage identification Machine learning-based prediction of seismic response of elevated steel tanks Multivariate risk assessment for offshore structures by Gaidai risk evaluation method under an accumulation of fatigue damage, utilizing novel deconvolution scheme Repairing thermally shocked reinforced concrete beams using innovative CFRP sheets anchorage systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1