A comparison study of pore structure and permeability of sandstone by BSE-SE images

Hongyang Ni , Hai Pu , Jiangfeng Liu , Junce Xu , Jiale Guo
{"title":"A comparison study of pore structure and permeability of sandstone by BSE-SE images","authors":"Hongyang Ni ,&nbsp;Hai Pu ,&nbsp;Jiangfeng Liu ,&nbsp;Junce Xu ,&nbsp;Jiale Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The pore structure and permeability of geotechnical materials are critical parameters that guide underground engineering. With advancements in digital imaging technology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has emerged as a vital tool for examining the pore structure and permeability of these materials. SEM operates in two primary modes: backscattered electron imaging (BSE) and secondary electron imaging (SE), each of which emphasizes different aspects of the material's structure. However, few studies have been conducted to elucidate the influence of these two modes on the quantification of geotechnical structural characteristics. This study undertakes a more comprehensive quantitative analysis of the structure and permeability of sandstones by juxtaposing the two modes. The findings indicate that the BSE mode excels in analyzing the structure and composition, whereas the SE mode highlights the surface morphology. In terms of image segmentation, BSE mode images are more conducive to effective segmentation. Although SE images permit viable segmentation when preprocessed, they tend to represent a greater number of discrete tiny pores. Furthermore, there exists a discernible correlation between pore size and shape, wherein larger pores exhibit heightened roughness and deviate more from sphericity. Notably, these larger pores predominantly contribute to the material's permeability. Given that the BSE mode more readily captures continuous pore structures, the permeability values derived from BSE images are significantly higher than those obtained from SE images. These findings hold profound implications for enhancing our comprehension of geotechnical materials' pore structure and permeability, thereby informing the strategic use of BSE and SE modes in related studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 213435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891024008054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pore structure and permeability of geotechnical materials are critical parameters that guide underground engineering. With advancements in digital imaging technology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has emerged as a vital tool for examining the pore structure and permeability of these materials. SEM operates in two primary modes: backscattered electron imaging (BSE) and secondary electron imaging (SE), each of which emphasizes different aspects of the material's structure. However, few studies have been conducted to elucidate the influence of these two modes on the quantification of geotechnical structural characteristics. This study undertakes a more comprehensive quantitative analysis of the structure and permeability of sandstones by juxtaposing the two modes. The findings indicate that the BSE mode excels in analyzing the structure and composition, whereas the SE mode highlights the surface morphology. In terms of image segmentation, BSE mode images are more conducive to effective segmentation. Although SE images permit viable segmentation when preprocessed, they tend to represent a greater number of discrete tiny pores. Furthermore, there exists a discernible correlation between pore size and shape, wherein larger pores exhibit heightened roughness and deviate more from sphericity. Notably, these larger pores predominantly contribute to the material's permeability. Given that the BSE mode more readily captures continuous pore structures, the permeability values derived from BSE images are significantly higher than those obtained from SE images. These findings hold profound implications for enhancing our comprehension of geotechnical materials' pore structure and permeability, thereby informing the strategic use of BSE and SE modes in related studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 BSE-SE 图像对比研究砂岩的孔隙结构和渗透性
岩土材料的孔隙结构和渗透性是指导地下工程的关键参数。随着数字成像技术的发展,扫描电子显微镜(SEM)已成为检测这些材料孔隙结构和渗透性的重要工具。扫描电子显微镜有两种主要工作模式:背散射电子成像(BSE)和二次电子成像(SE),每种模式都强调材料结构的不同方面。然而,很少有研究阐明这两种模式对岩土结构特征量化的影响。本研究将两种模式并列,对砂岩的结构和渗透性进行了更全面的定量分析。研究结果表明,BSE 模式擅长分析结构和成分,而 SE 模式则突出表面形态。在图像分割方面,BSE 模式图像更有利于有效分割。虽然 SE 图像经过预处理后可以进行可行的分割,但它们往往代表了更多离散的微小孔隙。此外,孔隙大小与形状之间存在明显的相关性,较大的孔隙会表现出更高的粗糙度,并更偏离球形。值得注意的是,这些较大的孔隙主要增加了材料的渗透性。由于 BSE 模式更容易捕捉到连续的孔隙结构,因此从 BSE 图像得出的渗透率值明显高于从 SE 图像得出的渗透率值。这些发现对提高我们对岩土材料孔隙结构和渗透性的理解具有深远的意义,从而为在相关研究中战略性地使用 BSE 和 SE 模式提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanism of microfracture propagation under mechanical–chemical coupling conditions considering dissolution Carbon steel pipeline CO2 erosion-corrosion damage prediction model and numerical simulation research Propped fracture conductivity in shale oil reservoirs: Prediction model and influencing factors Numerical study of using dual sources constructed via deconvolution to suppress the collar waves in acoustic logging while drilling Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of supercritical CO2 in depleted oil and gas reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1