Comparison of two strategies of glucocorticoid withdrawal in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low disease activity (STAR): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1136/ard-2024-226620
Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand, Clara Brusq, Maëva Masson, Vanina Bongard, Carine Salliot, Lucile Poiroux, Minh Nguyen, Christian Hubert Roux, Christophe Richez, Alain Saraux, Pascale Vergne-Salle, Jacques Morel, René-Marc Flipo, Muriel Piperno, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Hubert Marotte, Martin Soubrier, Laure Gossec, Philippe Dieudé, Slim Lassoued, Laurent Zabraniecki, Guillaume Couture, Jean Frédéric Boyer, Bénédicte Jamard, Yannick Degboe, Arnaud Constantin
{"title":"Comparison of two strategies of glucocorticoid withdrawal in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low disease activity (STAR): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.","authors":"Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand, Clara Brusq, Maëva Masson, Vanina Bongard, Carine Salliot, Lucile Poiroux, Minh Nguyen, Christian Hubert Roux, Christophe Richez, Alain Saraux, Pascale Vergne-Salle, Jacques Morel, René-Marc Flipo, Muriel Piperno, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Hubert Marotte, Martin Soubrier, Laure Gossec, Philippe Dieudé, Slim Lassoued, Laurent Zabraniecki, Guillaume Couture, Jean Frédéric Boyer, Bénédicte Jamard, Yannick Degboe, Arnaud Constantin","doi":"10.1136/ard-2024-226620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare two strategies-a hydrocortisone replacement strategy and a prednisone tapering strategy-for their success in glucocorticoid discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with low disease activity (LDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Strategies for glucocorticoid TApering in Rheumatoid arthritis (STAR) study was a double-blind, double-placebo randomised controlled trial including patients with RA receiving a stable dose of glucocorticoid 5 mg/day for ≥3 months and were in LDA for ≥3 months. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either replace prednisone with 20 mg/day of hydrocortisone for 3 months, then reduce to 10 mg/day for 3 months before discontinuation or to taper prednisone by 1 mg/day every month until complete discontinuation, contingent on maintaining LDA. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving glucocorticoid discontinuation at 12 months. Other secondary outcomes were proportion of flares, need for additional glucocorticoid use, disease activity, patient-reported outcomes and the results of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 102 patients randomised in the trial (mean age 62.4 years, 70.6% females), 53 had hydrocortisone replacement and 49 tapered prednisone. At 12 months, 29 patients (55%) in the hydrocortisone replacement group and 23 patients (47%) in the prednisone tapering group achieved glucocorticoid discontinuation (p=0.4). No difference was observed between groups in the secondary outcomes. No cases of acute adrenal insufficiency were observed; however, 17 patients still had an abnormal ACTH stimulation test at 12 months, with no differences between arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A hydrocortisone replacement strategy was not superior to a prednisone tapering strategy for achieving glucocorticoid discontinuation success in patients with RA in LDA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02997605.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2024-226620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare two strategies-a hydrocortisone replacement strategy and a prednisone tapering strategy-for their success in glucocorticoid discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with low disease activity (LDA).

Methods: The Strategies for glucocorticoid TApering in Rheumatoid arthritis (STAR) study was a double-blind, double-placebo randomised controlled trial including patients with RA receiving a stable dose of glucocorticoid 5 mg/day for ≥3 months and were in LDA for ≥3 months. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either replace prednisone with 20 mg/day of hydrocortisone for 3 months, then reduce to 10 mg/day for 3 months before discontinuation or to taper prednisone by 1 mg/day every month until complete discontinuation, contingent on maintaining LDA. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving glucocorticoid discontinuation at 12 months. Other secondary outcomes were proportion of flares, need for additional glucocorticoid use, disease activity, patient-reported outcomes and the results of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests.

Results: Of the 102 patients randomised in the trial (mean age 62.4 years, 70.6% females), 53 had hydrocortisone replacement and 49 tapered prednisone. At 12 months, 29 patients (55%) in the hydrocortisone replacement group and 23 patients (47%) in the prednisone tapering group achieved glucocorticoid discontinuation (p=0.4). No difference was observed between groups in the secondary outcomes. No cases of acute adrenal insufficiency were observed; however, 17 patients still had an abnormal ACTH stimulation test at 12 months, with no differences between arms.

Conclusion: A hydrocortisone replacement strategy was not superior to a prednisone tapering strategy for achieving glucocorticoid discontinuation success in patients with RA in LDA.

Trial registration number: NCT02997605.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿关节炎低疾病活动度患者停用糖皮质激素两种策略的比较(STAR):随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验。
目的比较两种策略--氢化可的松替代策略和泼尼松减量策略--在疾病活动度低(LDA)的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中停用糖皮质激素的成功率:类风湿性关节炎患者糖皮质激素减量策略(STAR)研究是一项双盲、双安慰剂随机对照试验,研究对象包括接受稳定剂量糖皮质激素5毫克/天治疗≥3个月、LDA≥3个月的类风湿性关节炎患者。患者按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到两种方案中,一种是用 20 毫克/天的氢化可的松替代泼尼松,持续 3 个月,然后减至 10 毫克/天,持续 3 个月后停药;另一种是在维持 LDA 的前提下,每月将泼尼松的剂量减少 1 毫克/天,直至完全停药。主要结果是12个月时实现停用糖皮质激素的患者比例。其他次要结果包括复发比例、额外使用糖皮质激素的需求、疾病活动、患者报告的结果以及促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)刺激试验的结果:在 102 名随机参加试验的患者(平均年龄 62.4 岁,70.6% 为女性)中,53 人接受了氢化可的松替代治疗,49 人减少了泼尼松用量。12 个月后,氢化可的松替代组的 29 名患者(55%)和泼尼松减量组的 23 名患者(47%)实现了糖皮质激素停药(P=0.4)。在次要结果中未观察到组间差异。没有观察到急性肾上腺功能不全的病例;但是,17 名患者在 12 个月时的促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验仍有异常,两组间无差异:试验注册号:NCT02997605:NCT02997605。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacodynamics of the S1P1 receptor modulator cenerimod in a phase 2b randomised clinical trial in patients with moderate to severe SLE. Psoriatic arthritis phenotype clusters and their association with treatment response: a real-world longitudinal cohort study from the psoriatic arthritis research consortium. Real-life use of the PEXIVAS reduced-dose glucocorticoid regimen in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Acod1-mediated inhibition of aerobic glycolysis suppresses osteoclast differentiation and attenuates bone erosion in arthritis. Low uveitis rates in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with bimekizumab: pooled results from phase 2b/3 trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1