"The stay here is, of course, not appropriate for an old person": the perspective of healthcare providers on older patients in the emergency department.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05429-9
Johannes Deutschbein, Andreas Wagenknecht, Gabriela Gilles, Martin Möckel, Liane Schenk
{"title":"\"The stay here is, of course, not appropriate for an old person\": the perspective of healthcare providers on older patients in the emergency department.","authors":"Johannes Deutschbein, Andreas Wagenknecht, Gabriela Gilles, Martin Möckel, Liane Schenk","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05429-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In aging societies, emergency departments (ED) face an increasing number of older, geriatric patients. Research shows that older emergency patients have a greater burden of comorbidities and a higher risk of adverse events. It has been questioned whether contemporary ED structures can meet the specific needs and characteristics of older patients. Little is known about how professional health care providers perceive and experience ED care for older patients. This study aimed to get insight into the perspective of healthcare providers working with older ED patients and to explore the challenges they experience in their daily work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a qualitative research design with a social-constructivist perspective and a Grounded Theory based methodology. Data were collected through qualitative interviews with N = 25 healthcare providers from different urban EDs in Berlin, Germany, and adjacent healthcare institutions. Following the Ground Theory approach, categories and central themes were identified, analyzed, and interpreted to gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare provider perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interviews revealed a significant and increasing relevance of geriatric ED patients for healthcare providers. However, there was no shared definition of 'the geriatric patient'. Most interviewees found ED structures to be inadequate for older patients. They described specific challenges, such as information gathering and safety risks in the ED, as well as an increased use of resources (both time and personnel) when caring for older patients. In addition, specific problems in the collaboration with other professions and institutions were addressed, namely nursing homes, hospital wards, consultations, and the hospital social service.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare providers experience a structural mismatch between contemporary EDs and the specific needs of geriatric patients. They are aware of the vulnerabilities of geriatric patients and try to compensate for inherent structural shortcomings. Such structures and limited resources often cause practical, organizational, and ethical problems. There is a great need to develop, implement, and evaluate systematic approaches and care concepts that address the specifics of ED care for geriatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"890"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05429-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In aging societies, emergency departments (ED) face an increasing number of older, geriatric patients. Research shows that older emergency patients have a greater burden of comorbidities and a higher risk of adverse events. It has been questioned whether contemporary ED structures can meet the specific needs and characteristics of older patients. Little is known about how professional health care providers perceive and experience ED care for older patients. This study aimed to get insight into the perspective of healthcare providers working with older ED patients and to explore the challenges they experience in their daily work.

Methods: The study used a qualitative research design with a social-constructivist perspective and a Grounded Theory based methodology. Data were collected through qualitative interviews with N = 25 healthcare providers from different urban EDs in Berlin, Germany, and adjacent healthcare institutions. Following the Ground Theory approach, categories and central themes were identified, analyzed, and interpreted to gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare provider perspective.

Results: The interviews revealed a significant and increasing relevance of geriatric ED patients for healthcare providers. However, there was no shared definition of 'the geriatric patient'. Most interviewees found ED structures to be inadequate for older patients. They described specific challenges, such as information gathering and safety risks in the ED, as well as an increased use of resources (both time and personnel) when caring for older patients. In addition, specific problems in the collaboration with other professions and institutions were addressed, namely nursing homes, hospital wards, consultations, and the hospital social service.

Conclusion: Healthcare providers experience a structural mismatch between contemporary EDs and the specific needs of geriatric patients. They are aware of the vulnerabilities of geriatric patients and try to compensate for inherent structural shortcomings. Such structures and limited resources often cause practical, organizational, and ethical problems. There is a great need to develop, implement, and evaluate systematic approaches and care concepts that address the specifics of ED care for geriatric patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"在这里住院当然不适合老年人":医疗服务提供者对急诊科老年病人的看法。
背景:在老龄化社会中,急诊科(ED)面临着越来越多的老年患者。研究表明,老年急诊患者的合并症负担更重,发生不良事件的风险更高。现代急诊科的结构能否满足老年患者的特殊需求和特点一直是个问题。对于专业医护人员如何看待和体验急诊室对老年患者的护理,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在深入了解为急诊室老年患者提供服务的医护人员的观点,并探讨他们在日常工作中遇到的挑战:本研究采用社会建构主义视角的定性研究设计和基于基础理论的方法。通过对来自德国柏林不同城市急诊室和邻近医疗机构的 N = 25 名医疗服务提供者进行定性访谈收集数据。按照基础理论的方法,确定了类别和中心主题,并对其进行了分析和解释,以全面了解医疗服务提供者的观点:结果:访谈显示,老年急诊室患者对医疗服务提供者的重要性与日俱增。然而,"老年病人 "并没有一个共同的定义。大多数受访者认为急诊室的结构不适合老年患者。他们描述了一些具体的挑战,例如急诊室的信息收集和安全风险,以及在护理老年患者时资源(时间和人员)使用的增加。此外,他们还提到了与其他专业和机构(即疗养院、医院病房、会诊和医院社会服务机构)合作的具体问题:结论:医疗服务提供者经历了当代急诊室与老年病人特殊需求之间的结构性不匹配。他们意识到老年病人的脆弱性,并试图弥补固有的结构缺陷。这种结构和有限的资源往往会造成实际、组织和伦理方面的问题。因此,亟需开发、实施和评估针对老年病人急诊室护理特殊性的系统方法和护理理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Impact of dementia on post-hip fracture walking ability: a stratified analysis based on pre-fracture mobility in Swedish cohorts of older adults. Quality of life and associated characteristics in long-term care residents with advanced dementia in Macao: a cross-sectional study. Home physical therapy versus telerehabilitation in improving motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1