Ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in serratus anterior plane block patients undergoing post-thoracotomy surgery: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02769-2
Mahbobeh Rashidi, Kamran Mahmoodi, Reza Baghbanian, Ahmadreza Mohtadi, Mahdi Selahi
{"title":"Ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in serratus anterior plane block patients undergoing post-thoracotomy surgery: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.","authors":"Mahbobeh Rashidi, Kamran Mahmoodi, Reza Baghbanian, Ahmadreza Mohtadi, Mahdi Selahi","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02769-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed and implemented to investigate the addition of dexmedetomidine to Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAP) with ropivacaine in reducing pain in patients undergoing post-thoracotomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status II, with a body mass index (BMI) under 40, who were undergoing thoracotomy at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups using a randomized controlled trial design. After surgery, in the recovery room, SAP was performed for patients with ropivacaine (0.4 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine solution) (group R) and ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) (group RD). Pain (with verbal rating scale, VNRS), blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP)), heart rate (HR), and blood oxygen saturation (O2 sat) were measured and recorded before the intervention, and 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 74 patients were included in this study. Both groups exhibited significant pain reduction at one hour, with sustained pain relief observed in the RD group at 6, 12, and 24 h (P < 0.001). The RD group also showed having lower values HR and MAP at 6 and 12 h (P < 0.001). Patients in the RD group received painkillers faster (P = 0.005) and required lower total narcotic usage (P < 0.0001). Two RD group patients experienced transient bradycardia, which resolved without treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study show that SAP block with dexmedetomidine is an effective and safe drug along with ropivacaine as a nerve-blocking agent in thoracotomy candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02769-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was designed and implemented to investigate the addition of dexmedetomidine to Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAP) with ropivacaine in reducing pain in patients undergoing post-thoracotomy surgery.

Methods: This study included patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status II, with a body mass index (BMI) under 40, who were undergoing thoracotomy at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups using a randomized controlled trial design. After surgery, in the recovery room, SAP was performed for patients with ropivacaine (0.4 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine solution) (group R) and ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) (group RD). Pain (with verbal rating scale, VNRS), blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP)), heart rate (HR), and blood oxygen saturation (O2 sat) were measured and recorded before the intervention, and 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the intervention.

Results: Finally, 74 patients were included in this study. Both groups exhibited significant pain reduction at one hour, with sustained pain relief observed in the RD group at 6, 12, and 24 h (P < 0.001). The RD group also showed having lower values HR and MAP at 6 and 12 h (P < 0.001). Patients in the RD group received painkillers faster (P = 0.005) and required lower total narcotic usage (P < 0.0001). Two RD group patients experienced transient bradycardia, which resolved without treatment.

Conclusion: The findings of this study show that SAP block with dexmedetomidine is an effective and safe drug along with ropivacaine as a nerve-blocking agent in thoracotomy candidates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗哌卡因与罗哌卡因加右美托咪定治疗胸廓切开术后锯肌前平面阻滞患者:随机双盲临床试验。
背景:本研究旨在探讨在使用罗哌卡因的前庭阻滞术(SAP)中加入右美托咪定可减轻胸廓切开术后患者的疼痛:研究对象包括在阿瓦士伊玛目霍梅尼医院(Imam Khomeini Hospital)接受开胸手术的美国麻醉学会(ASA)身体状况II级、体重指数(BMI)低于40的患者。采用随机对照试验设计将受试者随机分为两组。术后,在恢复室中,分别使用罗哌卡因(0.2% 罗哌卡因溶液,0.4 毫升/千克)(R 组)和罗哌卡因加右美托咪定(0.5 微克/千克)(RD 组)对患者进行 SAP 治疗。在干预前以及干预后 1、6、12、24 和 48 小时测量并记录疼痛(采用口头评分量表 VNRS)、血压(收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压(MAP))、心率(HR)和血氧饱和度(O2 sat):共有 74 名患者参与了此次研究。两组患者在 1 小时后疼痛均明显减轻,RD 组在 6、12 和 24 小时后疼痛持续缓解(P 结论:本研究结果表明,SAP 和 RD 均能有效缓解疼痛:本研究结果表明,使用右美托咪定进行 SAP 阻滞,与罗哌卡因一起作为胸廓切开术候选者的神经阻滞剂,是一种有效且安全的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1