Continental differences in the association between excess body weight and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07538-w
Larissa Vaz-Goncalves, Melinda M Protani, Jodi M Saunus, Graham A Colditz, Marina M Reeves
{"title":"Continental differences in the association between excess body weight and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Larissa Vaz-Goncalves, Melinda M Protani, Jodi M Saunus, Graham A Colditz, Marina M Reeves","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07538-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The association between obesity and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) prognosis has been equivocal, with considerable heterogeneity between and within studies. Recent meta-analyses report adverse associations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in TNBC. We update this evidence and examine study- and disease-specific sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of four databases was conducted until February 22, 2023. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) for OS, DFS, and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Subgroup analyses examined sources of study heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In meta-analyses of included studies (n = 33), significant associations were observed between excess body weight and worse OS (n = 24; HR = 1.20; 95%CI 1.20-1.34), DFS (n = 26; HR = 1.15; 1.05-1.27), and BCSM (n = 9; HR = 1.13; 1.00-1.27). In subgroup meta-analyses, significant inter-study survival differences were observed for study location (OS, DFS), time period of diagnoses (DFS), menopausal status (OS), and body mass index cut points examined (OS). Asian and European studies reported significant associations with OS (HR = 1.31; 1.11-1.54 and HR = 1.38; 1.00-1.89, respectively) and DFS (HR = 1.28; 1.07-1.54 and HR = 1.44; 1.13-1.84, respectively); however, no association was observed between obesity and TNBC prognosis in North American studies (OS: HR = 1.03; 0.89-1.19; DFS: HR = 1.05; 0.95-1.15). Location subgroup differences remained robust after excluding poor-quality studies. Post hoc analysis in the subset of studies reporting predominantly (≥ 70%) White sample showed no statistically significant associations for OS (HR = 1.13; 95%CI 0.96, 1.34), DFS (HR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.86, 1.23), or BCSM (HR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.91, 1.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study further confirms that obesity is associated with poor prognosis in TNBC and identified subgroups at higher risk. Ethnic differences in the association between excess body weight and TNBC are reported. Further exploration of study and patient characteristics is needed to properly understand the populations most at risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"215-227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07538-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The association between obesity and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) prognosis has been equivocal, with considerable heterogeneity between and within studies. Recent meta-analyses report adverse associations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in TNBC. We update this evidence and examine study- and disease-specific sources of heterogeneity.

Methods: A systematic search of four databases was conducted until February 22, 2023. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) for OS, DFS, and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Subgroup analyses examined sources of study heterogeneity.

Results: In meta-analyses of included studies (n = 33), significant associations were observed between excess body weight and worse OS (n = 24; HR = 1.20; 95%CI 1.20-1.34), DFS (n = 26; HR = 1.15; 1.05-1.27), and BCSM (n = 9; HR = 1.13; 1.00-1.27). In subgroup meta-analyses, significant inter-study survival differences were observed for study location (OS, DFS), time period of diagnoses (DFS), menopausal status (OS), and body mass index cut points examined (OS). Asian and European studies reported significant associations with OS (HR = 1.31; 1.11-1.54 and HR = 1.38; 1.00-1.89, respectively) and DFS (HR = 1.28; 1.07-1.54 and HR = 1.44; 1.13-1.84, respectively); however, no association was observed between obesity and TNBC prognosis in North American studies (OS: HR = 1.03; 0.89-1.19; DFS: HR = 1.05; 0.95-1.15). Location subgroup differences remained robust after excluding poor-quality studies. Post hoc analysis in the subset of studies reporting predominantly (≥ 70%) White sample showed no statistically significant associations for OS (HR = 1.13; 95%CI 0.96, 1.34), DFS (HR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.86, 1.23), or BCSM (HR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.91, 1.27).

Conclusion: This study further confirms that obesity is associated with poor prognosis in TNBC and identified subgroups at higher risk. Ethnic differences in the association between excess body weight and TNBC are reported. Further exploration of study and patient characteristics is needed to properly understand the populations most at risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重超标与三阴性乳腺癌预后之间的大陆差异:一项荟萃分析。
目的:肥胖与三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)预后之间的关系一直模棱两可,研究之间和研究内部存在相当大的异质性。最近的荟萃分析表明,肥胖与 TNBC 的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)存在不利关系。我们更新了这些证据,并研究了研究和疾病特异性的异质性来源:截至 2023 年 2 月 22 日,我们对四个数据库进行了系统检索。随机效应荟萃分析用于汇总OS、DFS和乳腺癌特异性死亡率(BCSM)的危险比(HR)。亚组分析检查了研究异质性的来源:在对纳入研究(n = 33)进行的荟萃分析中,观察到体重超标与较差的OS(n = 24;HR = 1.20;95%CI 1.20-1.34)、DFS(n = 26;HR = 1.15;1.05-1.27)和BCSM(n = 9;HR = 1.13;1.00-1.27)之间存在显著关联。在亚组荟萃分析中,研究地点(OS、DFS)、诊断时间段(DFS)、绝经状态(OS)和所研究的体重指数切点(OS)在研究间存在显著的生存差异。亚洲和欧洲的研究报告显示,肥胖与OS(HR=1.31;分别为1.11-1.54和HR=1.38;1.00-1.89)和DFS(HR=1.28;分别为1.07-1.54和HR=1.44;1.13-1.84)显著相关;然而,在北美的研究中未观察到肥胖与TNBC预后之间的关联(OS:HR=1.03;0.89-1.19;DFS:HR=1.05;0.95-1.15)。剔除质量较差的研究后,位置亚组差异仍保持稳定。对主要报告(≥ 70%)白人样本的研究子集进行的事后分析表明,OS(HR = 1.13; 95%CI 0.96, 1.34)、DFS(HR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.86, 1.23)或BCSM(HR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.91, 1.27)与肥胖无统计学意义:这项研究进一步证实了肥胖与TNBC的不良预后有关,并确定了风险较高的亚组。超重与TNBC之间的关系存在种族差异。要正确理解风险最高的人群,还需要进一步探讨研究和患者特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Updated systematic review and meta-analysis: taking the next step in physical activity behavioral interventions for post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Outcomes of patients with de novo oligometastatic breast cancer treated with curative intent at a single institution. Anti-HER2 treatment in everyday practice: how we treat older women with breast cancer differently. Risk of second non-breast primary cancer in Chinese breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Inhibition of GPX4 induces the death of p53-mutant triple-negative breast cancer cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1