Hematopoietic cell transplant compared with standard care in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood advances Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013926
Mark C Walters, Mary Eapen, Yiwen Liu, Fuad El Rassi, Edmund K Waller, John E Levine, John J Strouse, Joseph H Antin, Suhag H Parikh, Nitya Bakshi, Carlton Dampier, Jennifer J Jaroscak, Shayla Bergmann, Trisha Wong, Vamsi Kota, Betty Pace, Lazaros J Lekakis, Premal Lulla, Robert S Nickel, Kimberly A Kasow, Uday Popat, Wally Smith, Lolie Yu, Nancy DiFronzo, Nancy Geller, Naynesh Kamani, Elizabeth S Klings, Kathryn Hassell, Adam Mendizabal, Keith Sullivan, Donna Neuberg, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti
{"title":"Hematopoietic cell transplant compared with standard care in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease.","authors":"Mark C Walters, Mary Eapen, Yiwen Liu, Fuad El Rassi, Edmund K Waller, John E Levine, John J Strouse, Joseph H Antin, Suhag H Parikh, Nitya Bakshi, Carlton Dampier, Jennifer J Jaroscak, Shayla Bergmann, Trisha Wong, Vamsi Kota, Betty Pace, Lazaros J Lekakis, Premal Lulla, Robert S Nickel, Kimberly A Kasow, Uday Popat, Wally Smith, Lolie Yu, Nancy DiFronzo, Nancy Geller, Naynesh Kamani, Elizabeth S Klings, Kathryn Hassell, Adam Mendizabal, Keith Sullivan, Donna Neuberg, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Disease-modifying therapies are standard of care (SOC) for sickle cell disease (SCD), but hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has curative potential. We compared outcomes prospectively through 2 years after biologic assignment to a donor or no donor (SOC) arm based on the availability of an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor (BMT CTN 1503). A donor search was commenced after eligibility confirmation. The primary end point was a comparison of survival between the treatment arms 2 years after biologic assignment. Power calculations required 60 participants in the donor arm and 140 in the no donor arm to determine if early transplant-related mortality might be balanced by disease-related mortality over a longer period of follow-up. Secondary objectives were a comparison of the changes in SCD-related events, functional outcomes, and organ function. The data were analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle. A total of 113 participants were enrolled with 28 in the donor arm and 85 in the no donor arm. The 2-year probabilities of survival were 89% and 93%, in the donor vs no donor arms. Vaso-occlusive pain (VOC) was less frequent in the donor arm in the second year after biologic assignment (P < .001). Based on PROMIS-57 surveys, there was a decrease in fatigue (P = .003) and an increase in the ability to participate in social roles and activities (P = .003) in the donor arm 2 years after biologic assignment. Differences in other secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Barriers to accrual prevented an objective comparison of survival. Assignment to the donor arm led to improvements in VOC, fatigue, and social function. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02766465.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":"955-965"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Disease-modifying therapies are standard of care (SOC) for sickle cell disease (SCD), but hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has curative potential. We compared outcomes prospectively through 2 years after biologic assignment to a donor or no donor (SOC) arm based on the availability of an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor (BMT CTN 1503). A donor search was commenced after eligibility confirmation. The primary end point was a comparison of survival between the treatment arms 2 years after biologic assignment. Power calculations required 60 participants in the donor arm and 140 in the no donor arm to determine if early transplant-related mortality might be balanced by disease-related mortality over a longer period of follow-up. Secondary objectives were a comparison of the changes in SCD-related events, functional outcomes, and organ function. The data were analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle. A total of 113 participants were enrolled with 28 in the donor arm and 85 in the no donor arm. The 2-year probabilities of survival were 89% and 93%, in the donor vs no donor arms. Vaso-occlusive pain (VOC) was less frequent in the donor arm in the second year after biologic assignment (P < .001). Based on PROMIS-57 surveys, there was a decrease in fatigue (P = .003) and an increase in the ability to participate in social roles and activities (P = .003) in the donor arm 2 years after biologic assignment. Differences in other secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Barriers to accrual prevented an objective comparison of survival. Assignment to the donor arm led to improvements in VOC, fatigue, and social function. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02766465.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镰状细胞病青少年患者的造血细胞移植与标准护理比较
疾病调整疗法是镰状细胞病(SCD)的标准治疗方法(SOC),但造血细胞移植(HCT)具有治愈潜力。我们根据是否有 HLA 匹配的同胞或非亲缘供体(BMTCTN 1503; NCT02766465),对生物分配到供体或无供体(SOC)臂后 2 年的结果进行了前瞻性比较。资格确认后开始寻找供体。主要终点是比较不同治疗组生物分配后 2 年的存活率。功率计算要求供体臂有 60 名参与者,无供体臂有 140 名参与者,以确定在较长的随访期内,早期移植相关死亡率是否会与疾病相关死亡率相平衡。次要目标是比较 SCD 相关事件、功能结果和器官功能的变化。数据按照意向治疗原则进行分析。共有 113 名参与者参加了该研究,其中 28 人参加了供体臂,85 人参加了无供体臂。供体臂和无供体臂的 2 年生存概率分别为 89% 和 93%。在生物分配后的第二年,供体臂的血管闭塞性疼痛(VOC)发生率较低(P < 0.001)。在 PROMIS-57 调查中,生物制剂分配 2 年后,供体臂的疲劳程度降低(p=0.003),参与社会角色和活动的能力提高(p=0.003)。其他次要结果的差异未达到统计学意义。由于存在应征障碍,因此无法对存活率进行客观比较。分配到捐献者组后,VOC、疲劳和社会功能均有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
期刊最新文献
Unbiased high-throughput screening of drug-repurposing libraries identifies small-molecule inhibitors of clot retraction. Ibrutinib for therapy of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease: a multicenter real-world analysis. Hematopoietic cell transplant compared with standard care in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Identification of genomic biomarkers of disease progression and survival in primary CNS lymphoma. Treatment patterns and outcomes in follicular lymphoma with POD24: an analysis from the LEO Consortium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1