Mark C Walters, Mary Eapen, Yiwen Liu, Fuad El Rassi, Edmund K Waller, John E Levine, John J Strouse, Joseph H Antin, Suhag H Parikh, Nitya Bakshi, Carlton Dampier, Jennifer J Jaroscak, Shayla Bergmann, Trisha Wong, Vamsi Kota, Betty Pace, Lazaros J Lekakis, Premal Lulla, Robert S Nickel, Kimberly A Kasow, Uday Popat, Wally Smith, Lolie Yu, Nancy DiFronzo, Nancy Geller, Naynesh Kamani, Elizabeth S Klings, Kathryn Hassell, Adam Mendizabal, Keith Sullivan, Donna Neuberg, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti
{"title":"Hematopoietic cell transplant compared with standard care in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease.","authors":"Mark C Walters, Mary Eapen, Yiwen Liu, Fuad El Rassi, Edmund K Waller, John E Levine, John J Strouse, Joseph H Antin, Suhag H Parikh, Nitya Bakshi, Carlton Dampier, Jennifer J Jaroscak, Shayla Bergmann, Trisha Wong, Vamsi Kota, Betty Pace, Lazaros J Lekakis, Premal Lulla, Robert S Nickel, Kimberly A Kasow, Uday Popat, Wally Smith, Lolie Yu, Nancy DiFronzo, Nancy Geller, Naynesh Kamani, Elizabeth S Klings, Kathryn Hassell, Adam Mendizabal, Keith Sullivan, Donna Neuberg, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Disease-modifying therapies are standard of care (SOC) for sickle cell disease (SCD), but hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has curative potential. We compared outcomes prospectively through 2 years after biologic assignment to a donor or no donor (SOC) arm based on the availability of an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor (BMT CTN 1503). A donor search was commenced after eligibility confirmation. The primary end point was a comparison of survival between the treatment arms 2 years after biologic assignment. Power calculations required 60 participants in the donor arm and 140 in the no donor arm to determine if early transplant-related mortality might be balanced by disease-related mortality over a longer period of follow-up. Secondary objectives were a comparison of the changes in SCD-related events, functional outcomes, and organ function. The data were analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle. A total of 113 participants were enrolled with 28 in the donor arm and 85 in the no donor arm. The 2-year probabilities of survival were 89% and 93%, in the donor vs no donor arms. Vaso-occlusive pain (VOC) was less frequent in the donor arm in the second year after biologic assignment (P < .001). Based on PROMIS-57 surveys, there was a decrease in fatigue (P = .003) and an increase in the ability to participate in social roles and activities (P = .003) in the donor arm 2 years after biologic assignment. Differences in other secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Barriers to accrual prevented an objective comparison of survival. Assignment to the donor arm led to improvements in VOC, fatigue, and social function. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02766465.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":"955-965"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Disease-modifying therapies are standard of care (SOC) for sickle cell disease (SCD), but hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has curative potential. We compared outcomes prospectively through 2 years after biologic assignment to a donor or no donor (SOC) arm based on the availability of an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor (BMT CTN 1503). A donor search was commenced after eligibility confirmation. The primary end point was a comparison of survival between the treatment arms 2 years after biologic assignment. Power calculations required 60 participants in the donor arm and 140 in the no donor arm to determine if early transplant-related mortality might be balanced by disease-related mortality over a longer period of follow-up. Secondary objectives were a comparison of the changes in SCD-related events, functional outcomes, and organ function. The data were analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle. A total of 113 participants were enrolled with 28 in the donor arm and 85 in the no donor arm. The 2-year probabilities of survival were 89% and 93%, in the donor vs no donor arms. Vaso-occlusive pain (VOC) was less frequent in the donor arm in the second year after biologic assignment (P < .001). Based on PROMIS-57 surveys, there was a decrease in fatigue (P = .003) and an increase in the ability to participate in social roles and activities (P = .003) in the donor arm 2 years after biologic assignment. Differences in other secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Barriers to accrual prevented an objective comparison of survival. Assignment to the donor arm led to improvements in VOC, fatigue, and social function. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02766465.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.