Value of projectional imaging relative to cross-sectional imaging to assess catheter tip position in the superior vena cava: Evaluation of reader variability.

Abstract

Objectives: The assessment of correct positioning of central venous catheters (CVC) is of major concern to avoid complications.Vascular access associations have established the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) as the most appropriate CVC tip location. Among the different chest X-ray (CXR) landmarks proposed for assessing tip position relative to the CAJ, only the pericardial reflection lies in the same plane as the vascular structures assessed. Although extensively used, CXR has been criticized for its difficulty in estimating catheter tip location.We aimed to evaluate the observer variability to determine tip positioning on CXR. CT imaging was used as a gold standard for tip identification.

Material and methods: 107 CT scans of patients wearing port access catheter devices realized at the XXX University Hospital between January and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Distance from tip to cavo-atrial junction (DCAJ) was measured on topogram projectional imaging (PJ) and axial cross-sectional imaging (CS) by 2 × 2 observers (within and between evaluations). Observational statistics were reported using a paired t-test, repeatability coefficients (RC), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and they were displayed comprehensively using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: All ICC were >0.9, indicating excellent reliability. The mean difference between observers comparing CS and PJ was 0.13 ± 0.80 cm (P = 0.10) with outer 95% confidence limits of 1.92 cm and -2.17 cm and an RC of 1.79 cm.

Conclusion: CXR tip-position reading remains an accurate method for determining CVC localization. However, the assessment variability on CXR is plus or minus 2 cm and should be considered.

Advances in knowledge: Chest X-ray (CXR) for the assessment of tip position is subject to intra-individual and inter-individual variation. On CT, the variability is solely linked to determining the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) and represented about 1 cm. On CXR, there is a twofold challenge: the correct determination of the CAJ and the accurate identification of the catheter tip, leading to a greater variability of 2 cm.In clinical practice, while considering the 3 cm anatomical zone around the CAJ acceptable, operators should be aware of the 2 cm variability resulting from CXR assessment. To account for this variability and avoid the risk of positioning the tip beyond 3 cm from the CAJ (theoretically up to plus or minus 5 cm away from the CAJ), operators should reduce the CXR-based acceptable zone to 1 cm around the CAJ. This change may impact up to thirty percent of procedures.