Value of projectional imaging relative to cross-sectional imaging to assess catheter tip position in the superior vena cava: evaluation of reader variability.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae218
Giuseppe Gullo, David Christian Rotzinger, Pierre Frossard, Anaïs Colin, Guillaume Saliou, Salah Dine Qanadli
{"title":"Value of projectional imaging relative to cross-sectional imaging to assess catheter tip position in the superior vena cava: evaluation of reader variability.","authors":"Giuseppe Gullo, David Christian Rotzinger, Pierre Frossard, Anaïs Colin, Guillaume Saliou, Salah Dine Qanadli","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) is the most appropriate central venous catheters CVC tip location to reduce complications. Among chest X-ray (CXR) landmarks for tips assessment, only the pericardial reflection lies in the same plane as the vascular structures. We aimed to evaluate the observer variability to determine tip positioning on CXR, using CT as a gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 107 CT scans of patients with port catheters (January-December 2021). The tip to CAJ distance (DCAJ) was measured on both projectional (PJ) and cross-sectional (CS) CT images by 2 × 2 observers (within and between evaluations). Observational statistics included paired t-tests, repeatability coefficients (RC), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), with data visualized using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All ICC were >0.9, indicating excellent reliability. The mean difference between observers comparing CS and PJ was 0.13 ± 0.80 cm (P = .10) with outer 95% confidence limits of 1.92 cm and -2.17 cm and an RC of 1.79 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CXR provides a reliable method for CVC tip localization, though assessment variability is ±2 cm.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>CXR assessment of CVC tips shows both intra- and inter-individual variability, due to challenges in identifying the CAJ and catheter tip . While considering the 3 cm anatomical zone around the CAJ acceptable, operators should be aware of the 2 cm variability resulting from CXR assessment. To account for this variability and avoid the risk of positioning the tip beyond 3 cm from the CAJ, operators should reduce the CXR-based acceptable zone to 1 cm around the CAJ, impacting approximately 30% of procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) is the most appropriate central venous catheters CVC tip location to reduce complications. Among chest X-ray (CXR) landmarks for tips assessment, only the pericardial reflection lies in the same plane as the vascular structures. We aimed to evaluate the observer variability to determine tip positioning on CXR, using CT as a gold standard.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 107 CT scans of patients with port catheters (January-December 2021). The tip to CAJ distance (DCAJ) was measured on both projectional (PJ) and cross-sectional (CS) CT images by 2 × 2 observers (within and between evaluations). Observational statistics included paired t-tests, repeatability coefficients (RC), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), with data visualized using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: All ICC were >0.9, indicating excellent reliability. The mean difference between observers comparing CS and PJ was 0.13 ± 0.80 cm (P = .10) with outer 95% confidence limits of 1.92 cm and -2.17 cm and an RC of 1.79 cm.

Conclusion: CXR provides a reliable method for CVC tip localization, though assessment variability is ±2 cm.

Advances in knowledge: CXR assessment of CVC tips shows both intra- and inter-individual variability, due to challenges in identifying the CAJ and catheter tip . While considering the 3 cm anatomical zone around the CAJ acceptable, operators should be aware of the 2 cm variability resulting from CXR assessment. To account for this variability and avoid the risk of positioning the tip beyond 3 cm from the CAJ, operators should reduce the CXR-based acceptable zone to 1 cm around the CAJ, impacting approximately 30% of procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投影成像相对于横截面成像在评估上腔静脉导管尖端位置方面的价值:评估阅读器的可变性。
目的:评估中心静脉导管(CVC)的正确定位是避免并发症的关键所在。血管通路协会已将腔房交界处(CAJ)确定为最合适的 CVC 尖端位置。在为评估尖端相对于 CAJ 的位置而提出的不同胸部 X 光(CXR)地标中,只有心包反射与所评估的血管结构位于同一平面。我们的目的是评估观察者在 CXR 上确定导管尖端位置的可变性。材料和方法:回顾性分析了 XXX 大学医院 2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间对佩戴端口接入导管装置的 107 例患者进行的 CT 扫描。由 2 × 2 观察员(评估内和评估间)在地形图投影成像(PJ)和轴向横截面成像(CS)上测量尖端到腔心交界处(DCAJ)的距离。观察统计数据采用配对 t 检验、重复性系数 (RC) 和类内相关系数 (ICC) 进行报告,并采用 Bland-Altman 图进行综合显示:所有 ICC 均大于 0.9,表明可靠性极佳。观察者之间比较 CS 和 PJ 的平均差异为 0.13 ± 0.80 厘米(P = 0.10),95% 置信区间外差为 1.92 厘米和-2.17 厘米,RC 为 1.79 厘米:结论:CXR 尖端位置读数仍是确定 CVC 定位的准确方法。结论:CXR 尖端位置读数仍是确定 CVC 定位的准确方法,但 CXR 的评估变异性为正负 2 厘米,应加以考虑:胸部 X 光(CXR)用于评估尖端位置时,存在个体内部和个体之间的差异。在 CT 上,差异仅与确定腔房交界处(CAJ)有关,约为 1 厘米。在临床实践中,虽然认为 CAJ 周围 3 厘米的解剖区域是可以接受的,但操作者应注意 CXR 评估带来的 2 厘米变异。为了考虑到这一变异性并避免将针尖定位在距离 CAJ 3 厘米以外(理论上距离 CAJ 可达到正负 5 厘米)的风险,操作员应将基于 CXR 的可接受区域缩小到 CAJ 周围 1 厘米。这一改变可能会影响多达 30% 的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Evaluating liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients using multi-compartment restriction spectrum imaging. Transformer-based super-resolution lung CT images improve visualization of multiple diseases. Artificial Intelligence prognostication of liver disease using imaging. Evaluation of Patient Setup Accuracy using Optical Surface Guidance in Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients with Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery. Enhanced setup and positioning accuracy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: A customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1