A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing "Early" Versus "Late" Periosteal Patch Attachment to Knee Chondral Defects in Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS CARTILAGE Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1177/19476035241279943
Georgios Orfanos, Helen Samantha McCarthy, Michael Williams, Naomi Dugard, Peter Denis Gallacher, Alexander William Glover, Sally Roberts, Karina Therese Wright, Jan Herman Kuiper
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing \"Early\" Versus \"Late\" Periosteal Patch Attachment to Knee Chondral Defects in Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.","authors":"Georgios Orfanos, Helen Samantha McCarthy, Michael Williams, Naomi Dugard, Peter Denis Gallacher, Alexander William Glover, Sally Roberts, Karina Therese Wright, Jan Herman Kuiper","doi":"10.1177/19476035241279943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traditional autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) involves arthroscopically harvesting a cartilage biopsy (stage 1), followed by arthrotomy 3 to 4 weeks later to apply a periosteal patch and implant culture-expanded chondrocytes underneath (stage 2). This study aimed to determine if patch application during stage 1 rather than stage 2 improved clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 1998 to 2001. Patients were randomized to receive either traditional ACI (control/late) or ACI with \"early\" patch during stage 1 (intervention/early). Clinical outcome (Lysholm score) was assessed pre-operatively and annually post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven patients were recruited, with 40 patients randomized to the early and 37 to the late patch group. The overall mean pre-operative Lysholm score was 51.8 (range 11-89) and significantly improved by 11.1 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.8 to 17.4) at mean 12.7 years (range 1.5-23.7) follow-up. Latest mean Lysholm scores for the early and late groups were 68.4 (95% CI = 19 to 100) versus 56.7 (95% CI = 18 to 98). Adjusted for covariate imbalances, no evidence was found for a difference between the groups (mean difference = 8.5, 95% CI = -5.2 to 22.2, <i>P</i> = 0.22). Twenty-year survival until any re-operation or arthroplasty was 59.6%/82.1% for the early and 56.8%/69.5% for the late group, with no evidence for a difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACI is an effective durable treatment for cartilage defects, with high levels of patient satisfaction and low failure rates. No evidence was found that applying the periosteal patch at the time of chondrocyte harvest improved long-term Lysholm scores or survival until any re-operation or arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9626,"journal":{"name":"CARTILAGE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CARTILAGE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035241279943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Traditional autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) involves arthroscopically harvesting a cartilage biopsy (stage 1), followed by arthrotomy 3 to 4 weeks later to apply a periosteal patch and implant culture-expanded chondrocytes underneath (stage 2). This study aimed to determine if patch application during stage 1 rather than stage 2 improved clinical outcome.

Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 1998 to 2001. Patients were randomized to receive either traditional ACI (control/late) or ACI with "early" patch during stage 1 (intervention/early). Clinical outcome (Lysholm score) was assessed pre-operatively and annually post-operatively.

Results: Seventy-seven patients were recruited, with 40 patients randomized to the early and 37 to the late patch group. The overall mean pre-operative Lysholm score was 51.8 (range 11-89) and significantly improved by 11.1 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.8 to 17.4) at mean 12.7 years (range 1.5-23.7) follow-up. Latest mean Lysholm scores for the early and late groups were 68.4 (95% CI = 19 to 100) versus 56.7 (95% CI = 18 to 98). Adjusted for covariate imbalances, no evidence was found for a difference between the groups (mean difference = 8.5, 95% CI = -5.2 to 22.2, P = 0.22). Twenty-year survival until any re-operation or arthroplasty was 59.6%/82.1% for the early and 56.8%/69.5% for the late group, with no evidence for a difference.

Conclusion: ACI is an effective durable treatment for cartilage defects, with high levels of patient satisfaction and low failure rates. No evidence was found that applying the periosteal patch at the time of chondrocyte harvest improved long-term Lysholm scores or survival until any re-operation or arthroplasty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较自体软骨细胞植入术中膝关节软骨缺损 "早期 "与 "晚期 "骨膜补片附着的随机对照试验。
目的:传统的自体软骨细胞植入术(ACI)包括在关节镜下采集软骨活检组织(第一阶段),然后在 3-4 周后进行关节切开术,在骨膜上贴上补片,并将培养扩增的软骨细胞植入其下(第二阶段)。本研究旨在确定在第一阶段而非第二阶段使用补片是否能改善临床效果:设计:1998 年至 2001 年期间进行了一项随机对照试验。患者被随机分配接受传统的 ACI(对照组/晚期)或在第一阶段使用 "早期 "补片的 ACI(干预组/早期)。临床结果(Lysholm 评分)在术前和术后每年进行一次评估:共招募了 77 名患者,其中 40 名患者被随机分配到早期补片组,37 名患者被随机分配到晚期补片组。术前 Lysholm 评分的总体平均值为 51.8 分(范围为 11-89),在平均 12.7 年(范围为 1.5-23.7)的随访中显著提高了 11.1 分(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 4.8 至 17.4)。早期组和晚期组的最新平均 Lysholm 评分分别为 68.4(95% CI = 19 至 100)和 56.7(95% CI = 18 至 98)。对协变量不平衡进行调整后,没有证据表明两组之间存在差异(平均差异 = 8.5,95% CI = -5.2 至 22.2,P = 0.22)。直到再次手术或关节置换术前的20年生存率,早期组为59.6%/82.1%,晚期组为56.8%/69.5%,没有证据表明存在差异:ACI是一种有效的软骨缺损持久治疗方法,患者满意度高,失败率低。结论:ACI是一种有效的软骨缺损持久治疗方法,患者满意度高,失败率低。没有证据表明,在采集软骨细胞时使用骨膜补片可提高长期Lysholm评分或再次手术或关节置换术前的存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CARTILAGE
CARTILAGE ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: CARTILAGE publishes articles related to the musculoskeletal system with particular attention to cartilage repair, development, function, degeneration, transplantation, and rehabilitation. The journal is a forum for the exchange of ideas for the many types of researchers and clinicians involved in cartilage biology and repair. A primary objective of CARTILAGE is to foster the cross-fertilization of the findings between clinical and basic sciences throughout the various disciplines involved in cartilage repair. The journal publishes full length original manuscripts on all types of cartilage including articular, nasal, auricular, tracheal/bronchial, and intervertebral disc fibrocartilage. Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research are welcome. Review articles, editorials, and letters are also encouraged. The ICRS envisages CARTILAGE as a forum for the exchange of knowledge among clinicians, scientists, patients, and researchers. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) is dedicated to promotion, encouragement, and distribution of fundamental and applied research of cartilage in order to permit a better knowledge of function and dysfunction of articular cartilage and its repair.
期刊最新文献
Il-1β Promotes Superficial Zone Cells Senescence in Articular Cartilage by Inhibiting Autophagy. Decreased Elastic Modulus of Knee Articular Cartilage Based on New Macroscopic Methods Accurately Represents Early Histological Findings of Degeneration. Aerobic and Resistance Training Attenuate Differently Knee Joint Damage Caused by a High-Fat-High-Sucrose Diet in a Rat Model. Low-Grade Inflammatory Mediators and Metalloproteinases Yield Synchronous and Delayed Responses to Mechanical Joint Loading. Upregulated Mitochondrial Dynamics Is Responsible for the Procatabolic Changes of Chondrocyte Induced by α2-Adrenergic Signal Activation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1