The Role of Primary Care Providers in Lung Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.10.002
Lye-Yeng Wong, Ntemena Kapula, Augustine Kang, Anuradha J Phadke, Andrew D Schechtman, Irmina A Elliott, Brandon A Guenthart, Douglas Z Liou, Leah M Backhus, Mark F Berry, Joseph B Shrager, Natalie S Lui
{"title":"The Role of Primary Care Providers in Lung Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Lye-Yeng Wong, Ntemena Kapula, Augustine Kang, Anuradha J Phadke, Andrew D Schechtman, Irmina A Elliott, Brandon A Guenthart, Douglas Z Liou, Leah M Backhus, Mark F Berry, Joseph B Shrager, Natalie S Lui","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidisciplinary lung cancer screening (LCS) programs that perform shared decision-making visits (SDMV) and follow up annual low dose computed tomography (LDCT) have been emerging. We hypothesize that primary care providers (PCPs) prefer to refer patients to LCS programs instead of facilitating the screening process themselves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study in which an online survey was administered to PCPs between April 2023 and June 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 PCPs in the same hospital network participated in the study with a median age of 43 (34-51), predominance of women (77.6%), and clinicians of white and Asian race (44.8% and 48.3%). Respondents estimated that 26.1% (SD 32.4%) of their eligible patients participate in LCS screening. PCPs thought that an LCS program was equally convenient to performing screening themselves for identifying eligible patients and ordering LDCT. However, 63.8% of participants preferred an LCS program for performing SDMVs, 62.1% for ensuring annual follow-up on negative LDCTs, 70.7% for deciding next steps on positive LDCTs, and 60.4% for performing smoking cessation counseling. PCPs agreed that an LCS program saves time (69%), allows patients to receive specialty care (65.6%), addresses patient concerns (70.7%), ensures annual follow-up (77.6%), and manages abnormal findings (79.3%). However, they also expressed concerns about an additional visit for the patient (48.2%) and patient cost (46.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most PCPs believe that formal LCS programs have many benefits including providing specialized care and follow up, although there were concerns about patient time and cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.10.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multidisciplinary lung cancer screening (LCS) programs that perform shared decision-making visits (SDMV) and follow up annual low dose computed tomography (LDCT) have been emerging. We hypothesize that primary care providers (PCPs) prefer to refer patients to LCS programs instead of facilitating the screening process themselves.

Methods: This is a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study in which an online survey was administered to PCPs between April 2023 and June 2023.

Results: 58 PCPs in the same hospital network participated in the study with a median age of 43 (34-51), predominance of women (77.6%), and clinicians of white and Asian race (44.8% and 48.3%). Respondents estimated that 26.1% (SD 32.4%) of their eligible patients participate in LCS screening. PCPs thought that an LCS program was equally convenient to performing screening themselves for identifying eligible patients and ordering LDCT. However, 63.8% of participants preferred an LCS program for performing SDMVs, 62.1% for ensuring annual follow-up on negative LDCTs, 70.7% for deciding next steps on positive LDCTs, and 60.4% for performing smoking cessation counseling. PCPs agreed that an LCS program saves time (69%), allows patients to receive specialty care (65.6%), addresses patient concerns (70.7%), ensures annual follow-up (77.6%), and manages abnormal findings (79.3%). However, they also expressed concerns about an additional visit for the patient (48.2%) and patient cost (46.5%).

Conclusion: Most PCPs believe that formal LCS programs have many benefits including providing specialized care and follow up, although there were concerns about patient time and cost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健提供者在肺癌筛查中的作用:一项横断面调查。
背景:多学科肺癌筛查(LCS)项目正在兴起,该项目执行共同决策访问(SDMV)和年度低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)随访。我们假设,初级保健提供者(PCPs)更愿意将患者转介给肺癌筛查项目,而不是自己推动筛查过程:这是一项混合方法横断面研究,我们在 2023 年 4 月至 2023 年 6 月期间对初级保健提供者进行了在线调查:同一医院网络中的 58 名初级保健医生参与了研究,他们的中位年龄为 43 岁(34-51 岁),女性占多数(77.6%),临床医生为白人和亚裔(44.8% 和 48.3%)。受访者估计其符合条件的患者中有 26.1%(标度 32.4%)参加了 LCS 筛查。初级保健医生认为,在确定符合条件的患者和订购 LDCT 方面,LCS 计划与自己进行筛查同样方便。然而,63.8% 的参与者倾向于使用 LCS 项目进行 SDMV,62.1% 的参与者倾向于使用 LCS 项目确保每年对 LDCT 阴性患者进行随访,70.7% 的参与者倾向于使用 LCS 项目决定 LDCT 阳性患者的下一步治疗,60.4% 的参与者倾向于使用 LCS 项目进行戒烟咨询。初级保健医生一致认为,LCS 计划可以节省时间(69%)、让患者接受专科治疗(65.6%)、解决患者的疑虑(70.7%)、确保年度随访(77.6%)以及处理异常结果(79.3%)。然而,他们也对患者额外就诊(48.2%)和患者费用(46.5%)表示担忧:大多数初级保健医生认为,正规的 LCS 项目有很多好处,包括提供专业护理和随访,但他们也对患者的时间和费用表示担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1