{"title":"Evaluation of Rheumatologists' Teledermatology Practices and Perspectives.","authors":"Gökçe Kenar-Artın","doi":"10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.24044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In their regular practice, rheumatologists often come across patients with skin and nail abnormalities, so they need dermatology consultations. A new option available today is the use of telemedicine for dermatology consultations. The aim of this study is to assess how frequently rheumatologists use this method, known as teledermatology (TD), and to investigate their perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a survey of rheumatologists in Türkiye. The survey, generated with Google Docs, was e-mailed to rheumatologists who are members of the Turkish Rheumatology Association and asked them to complete it.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 rheumatologists completed the survey, with 85 women (70%) and 37 men (30%). The rheumatologists claimed that they encounter a mean of 6.60 (SD: 6.90) patients with skin/ nail lesions each week in their clinical practice and consult them for face-to-face (FTF) dermatology examinations for a mean of 12.3 (SD: 15.56) patients every month. Of the rheumatologists who took part in the trial, 38.5% said they experienced the TD approach. Most of them (n: 30, 62.5%) use TD “occasionally.” A significant proportion of rheumatologists stated that they used TD to consult with dermatologists in their personal networks (54.2%), dermatologists at the hospital where they work (47.2%), or dermatologists with advanced academic training in their field (45.8%). Most rheumatologists (60.8%) reported that, following TD, they only refer their patients to FTF examinations if the dermatologist requests it (e.g., for a biopsy). Some of the rheumatologists (37.5%) stated that TD would be effective in all skin lesions, but most rheumatologists (52.1%) stated TD would be more beneficial for special skin/nail lesions like infectious skin lesions or inflammatory dermatoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that a considerable number of rheumatologists use TD. Most rheumatologists schedule TD consults with dermatologists to gain speed for diagnosis and due to a lack of appointment availability from dermatologists. In rheumatology practice, clinicians have noted that they found TD effective for a wide range of skin/nail lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12066,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology","volume":"11 3","pages":"358-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.24044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In their regular practice, rheumatologists often come across patients with skin and nail abnormalities, so they need dermatology consultations. A new option available today is the use of telemedicine for dermatology consultations. The aim of this study is to assess how frequently rheumatologists use this method, known as teledermatology (TD), and to investigate their perspectives.
Methods: This study is a survey of rheumatologists in Türkiye. The survey, generated with Google Docs, was e-mailed to rheumatologists who are members of the Turkish Rheumatology Association and asked them to complete it.
Results: A total of 122 rheumatologists completed the survey, with 85 women (70%) and 37 men (30%). The rheumatologists claimed that they encounter a mean of 6.60 (SD: 6.90) patients with skin/ nail lesions each week in their clinical practice and consult them for face-to-face (FTF) dermatology examinations for a mean of 12.3 (SD: 15.56) patients every month. Of the rheumatologists who took part in the trial, 38.5% said they experienced the TD approach. Most of them (n: 30, 62.5%) use TD “occasionally.” A significant proportion of rheumatologists stated that they used TD to consult with dermatologists in their personal networks (54.2%), dermatologists at the hospital where they work (47.2%), or dermatologists with advanced academic training in their field (45.8%). Most rheumatologists (60.8%) reported that, following TD, they only refer their patients to FTF examinations if the dermatologist requests it (e.g., for a biopsy). Some of the rheumatologists (37.5%) stated that TD would be effective in all skin lesions, but most rheumatologists (52.1%) stated TD would be more beneficial for special skin/nail lesions like infectious skin lesions or inflammatory dermatoses.
Conclusion: This study showed that a considerable number of rheumatologists use TD. Most rheumatologists schedule TD consults with dermatologists to gain speed for diagnosis and due to a lack of appointment availability from dermatologists. In rheumatology practice, clinicians have noted that they found TD effective for a wide range of skin/nail lesions.