The art of peer reviewing.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1007/s12024-024-00905-5
Roger W Byard
{"title":"The art of peer reviewing.","authors":"Roger W Byard","doi":"10.1007/s12024-024-00905-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer review of submitted manuscripts refers to the process of sending out papers for evaluation by suitably qualified academics/practitioners working in the same area. After their assessments and recommendations have been addressed by submitting authors editors will decide on whether publication is warranted or not. Unfortunately, 'peer review' has achieved a high status in courts without a real understanding of the way that the system works. Given that it has been deemed: 'a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works', greater understanding of the nature of peer review is required. The following paper provides an overview of its strengths and weaknesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12449,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00905-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer review of submitted manuscripts refers to the process of sending out papers for evaluation by suitably qualified academics/practitioners working in the same area. After their assessments and recommendations have been addressed by submitting authors editors will decide on whether publication is warranted or not. Unfortunately, 'peer review' has achieved a high status in courts without a real understanding of the way that the system works. Given that it has been deemed: 'a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works', greater understanding of the nature of peer review is required. The following paper provides an overview of its strengths and weaknesses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同行评审的艺术
投稿同行评审是指将论文送交同一领域具有相应资质的学者/从业人员进行评估的过程。在他们的评估和建议得到投稿作者的回应后,编辑将决定是否发表。不幸的是,"同行评审 "在法庭上获得了很高的地位,但却没有真正了解该系统的运作方式。鉴于 "同行评审 "被认为是 "一个有缺陷的过程,充满了容易被发现的缺陷,而且几乎没有证据表明它是有效的",因此需要对同行评审的性质有更深入的了解。以下文件概述了同行评审的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology MEDICINE, LEGAL-PATHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology encompasses all aspects of modern day forensics, equally applying to children or adults, either living or the deceased. This includes forensic science, medicine, nursing, and pathology, as well as toxicology, human identification, mass disasters/mass war graves, profiling, imaging, policing, wound assessment, sexual assault, anthropology, archeology, forensic search, entomology, botany, biology, veterinary pathology, and DNA. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology presents a balance of forensic research and reviews from around the world to reflect modern advances through peer-reviewed papers, short communications, meeting proceedings and case reports.
期刊最新文献
A forensic overview of deaths in mountainous terrain. Fifty shades of green and blue: autopsy findings after administration of xenobiotics. Visual analysis of postmortem interval estimation trends and collaborative networks: a 15-year study (2006-2020). The art of peer reviewing. Development of conductive fingermarks for forensic applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1