{"title":"Dural tears with cauda equina herniation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a case report and literature review.","authors":"Shiwei Xie, Mingwei Luo, Heng Xiao","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1487567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a prevalent condition that severely impacts patients' quality of life and work capacity. Traditional surgical treatments like laminectomy, while effective, involve significant invasiveness and potential complications, including long-term spinal instability and recurrent symptoms. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has become a popular option due to its reduced trauma and faster recovery. However, PELD, while beneficial, carries risks, including complications that may not be immediately evident. This report presents the case of a 60-year-old female patient who underwent PELD for L4/5 disc herniation but experienced significant postoperative complications, including increased pain and neurological symptoms. Initial conservative management failed, and further investigations suggested possible postoperative infection, though this was later ruled out through surgical exploration and bacterial cultures. The patient subsequently underwent open surgical exploration, which revealed extensive tissue damage and required additional interventions, including a minimally invasive lateral anterior approach for stabilization and fusion (MIS-OLIF). Postoperative recovery was successful, with complete symptom resolution and stable spine alignment at a six-month follow-up. This case highlights the complexity of managing PELD-related complications and underscores the importance of thorough diagnostic evaluation and the potential need for additional surgical interventions to ensure long-term patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1487567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1487567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a prevalent condition that severely impacts patients' quality of life and work capacity. Traditional surgical treatments like laminectomy, while effective, involve significant invasiveness and potential complications, including long-term spinal instability and recurrent symptoms. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has become a popular option due to its reduced trauma and faster recovery. However, PELD, while beneficial, carries risks, including complications that may not be immediately evident. This report presents the case of a 60-year-old female patient who underwent PELD for L4/5 disc herniation but experienced significant postoperative complications, including increased pain and neurological symptoms. Initial conservative management failed, and further investigations suggested possible postoperative infection, though this was later ruled out through surgical exploration and bacterial cultures. The patient subsequently underwent open surgical exploration, which revealed extensive tissue damage and required additional interventions, including a minimally invasive lateral anterior approach for stabilization and fusion (MIS-OLIF). Postoperative recovery was successful, with complete symptom resolution and stable spine alignment at a six-month follow-up. This case highlights the complexity of managing PELD-related complications and underscores the importance of thorough diagnostic evaluation and the potential need for additional surgical interventions to ensure long-term patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.