Evaluating robotic assistance on the learning curve and efficiency of mandibular angle ostectomy: an animal model study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1453135
Wenqing Han, Yingjie Yan, Mengzhe Sun, Ziwei Zhang, Li Lin, Yan Zhang, Gang Chai
{"title":"Evaluating robotic assistance on the learning curve and efficiency of mandibular angle ostectomy: an animal model study.","authors":"Wenqing Han, Yingjie Yan, Mengzhe Sun, Ziwei Zhang, Li Lin, Yan Zhang, Gang Chai","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1453135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy and learning curve of a maxillofacial surgical robotic system (MSRS) guided by electromagnetic navigation for mandibular angle ostectomy (MAO), compared to traditional surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized a controlled experiment involving thirty rabbits, paired divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group underwent MAO using the MSRS, while the control group was treated with conventional surgical techniques. The surgeons performing the procedures were inexperienced in robotic surgery and MAO to assess the learning curve and the impact of robotic assistance. Key parameters measured included the accuracy of ostectomy, setup time, and ostectomy efficiency, with data analyzed through a paired-t test to compare the performance between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study indicated a significant reduction in ostectomy time for the experimental group, with improved accuracy and efficiency in ostectomy. The study found that robotic assistance could decrease the risk of complications and enhance surgical outcomes. It also highlighted the presence of an initial learning curve when adopting new robotic technologies, which could be mitigated through adequate training and simulation practices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Using MSRS for MAO could lead to faster early learning curves and increased ostectomy efficiency compared to traditional surgical methods. It demonstrated the potential benefits of integrating robotic systems into craniofacial surgery, suggesting a promising direction for future surgical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1453135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the efficacy and learning curve of a maxillofacial surgical robotic system (MSRS) guided by electromagnetic navigation for mandibular angle ostectomy (MAO), compared to traditional surgical methods.

Methods: The study utilized a controlled experiment involving thirty rabbits, paired divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group underwent MAO using the MSRS, while the control group was treated with conventional surgical techniques. The surgeons performing the procedures were inexperienced in robotic surgery and MAO to assess the learning curve and the impact of robotic assistance. Key parameters measured included the accuracy of ostectomy, setup time, and ostectomy efficiency, with data analyzed through a paired-t test to compare the performance between the two groups.

Results: The study indicated a significant reduction in ostectomy time for the experimental group, with improved accuracy and efficiency in ostectomy. The study found that robotic assistance could decrease the risk of complications and enhance surgical outcomes. It also highlighted the presence of an initial learning curve when adopting new robotic technologies, which could be mitigated through adequate training and simulation practices.

Discussion: Using MSRS for MAO could lead to faster early learning curves and increased ostectomy efficiency compared to traditional surgical methods. It demonstrated the potential benefits of integrating robotic systems into craniofacial surgery, suggesting a promising direction for future surgical practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估机器人辅助下颌角切除术的学习曲线和效率:一项动物模型研究。
导言:本研究评估了电磁导航引导下颌角切除术(MAO)的颌面外科机器人系统(MSRS)与传统手术方法相比的疗效和学习曲线:研究采用对照实验,将 30 只兔子配对分为实验组和对照组。实验组使用 MSRS 进行 MAO 手术,而对照组则使用传统手术技术。执行手术的外科医生没有机器人手术和 MAO 的经验,以评估学习曲线和机器人辅助的影响。测量的主要参数包括输卵管切除术的准确性、设置时间和输卵管切除术的效率,通过配对t检验分析数据,比较两组的表现:结果:研究表明,实验组的切除术时间明显缩短,切除术的准确性和效率也有所提高。研究发现,机器人辅助可降低并发症风险,提高手术效果。研究还强调,在采用新的机器人技术时,初期学习曲线是存在的,但可以通过适当的培训和模拟练习来缓解这一问题:讨论:与传统手术方法相比,使用MSRS进行MAO手术可加快早期学习曲线,并提高切除术的效率。它证明了将机器人系统整合到颅颌面手术中的潜在好处,为未来的手术实践指明了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Coverage of large soft tissue defects of the lower limb and foot with superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. Robotic colorectal surgery in Latin America: a systematic review on surgical outcomes. Integrating 3D technology with the Sampaio classification for enhanced percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complex renal calculi treatment. Integrative prognostic modeling for stage III lung adenosquamous carcinoma post-tumor resection: machine learning insights and web-based implementation. Extrarenal renal cell carcinoma in the adrenal region: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1