Maternal Outcome in Pregnant Women Undergoing Third Caesarean Section After Onset of Labor.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL In vivo Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13750
Michael Meier, Ardawan Ilkhanipur, Peter Mallmann, Björn Lampe
{"title":"Maternal Outcome in Pregnant Women Undergoing Third Caesarean Section After Onset of Labor.","authors":"Michael Meier, Ardawan Ilkhanipur, Peter Mallmann, Björn Lampe","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Our study compares repeat cesarian section with and without labor in progress and evaluates adverse maternal outcomes that could discourage pregnant women in planning labor at term or at least after 39 weeks of gestation as recommended due to benefits in neonatal outcome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed 191 patients undergoing third C-section and compared two groups of women of undergoing C-section either before or after the onset of labor. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of maternal morbidity. Values of p≤0.05 were regarded as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the two subgroups, we did not find any significant differences in the occurrence of maternal complications or severe acute morbidity except for incomplete uterine rupture (p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Undergoing a third C-section after the start of labor has no relevant or adverse impact on maternal outcome. Therefore, elective repeat C-section can be planned in late weeks of gestation aiming at reducing neonatal morbidity. The higher rate of uterine dehiscence was not associated with other issues of severe acute maternal morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"38 6","pages":"2718-2728"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Our study compares repeat cesarian section with and without labor in progress and evaluates adverse maternal outcomes that could discourage pregnant women in planning labor at term or at least after 39 weeks of gestation as recommended due to benefits in neonatal outcome.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 191 patients undergoing third C-section and compared two groups of women of undergoing C-section either before or after the onset of labor. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of maternal morbidity. Values of p≤0.05 were regarded as significant.

Results: Comparing the two subgroups, we did not find any significant differences in the occurrence of maternal complications or severe acute morbidity except for incomplete uterine rupture (p=0.04).

Conclusion: Undergoing a third C-section after the start of labor has no relevant or adverse impact on maternal outcome. Therefore, elective repeat C-section can be planned in late weeks of gestation aiming at reducing neonatal morbidity. The higher rate of uterine dehiscence was not associated with other issues of severe acute maternal morbidity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩后进行第三次剖腹产的孕妇的产妇结局
背景/目的:我们的研究比较了有临产和无临产的重复剖腹产,并评估了对产妇不利的结果,这些结果可能会阻止孕妇计划在足月或至少在妊娠 39 周后分娩,因为这对新生儿的预后有好处:在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了191名接受第三次剖腹产的患者,并对两组在临产前或临产后接受剖腹产的产妇进行了比较。主要结果指标是产妇发病率。P≤0.05为差异有显著性:结果:比较两个亚组,除了子宫不完全破裂(P=0.04)外,我们没有发现产妇并发症或严重急性发病率有任何显著差异:结论:分娩开始后进行第三次剖腹产对产妇的预后没有相关或不利的影响。因此,可在妊娠晚期计划选择再次剖腹产,以降低新生儿发病率。较高的子宫开裂率与其他严重急性产妇发病率问题无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Liquid-based Cytological Features of Adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified, Extrauterine Adenocarcinoma, and Other Malignant Neoplasms of The Uterine Cervix: A 5-year Single-institutional Experience With 30 Consecutive Patients. Long-term Effect of the HCV Elimination With Direct-acting Antivirals on the Progression of Gastroesophageal Varices. Long-term Impacts of Long COVID: Increased Incidence of Cardiomyopathies, Joint Diseases, and Psychoanxiety Disorders. Malignant Triton Tumor of the Distal Femur: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Management of Recurrent Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia With Oritavancin: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1