Time in target range for systolic blood pressure and glucose with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality risks.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Research Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1038/s41440-024-01969-0
Yijun Zhang, Xue Tian, Qin Xu, Xue Xia, Shuohua Chen, Yi Wang, Shouling Wu, Anxin Wang
{"title":"Time in target range for systolic blood pressure and glucose with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality risks.","authors":"Yijun Zhang, Xue Tian, Qin Xu, Xue Xia, Shuohua Chen, Yi Wang, Shouling Wu, Anxin Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01969-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence on the combined effect of time in the target range (TTR) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) in real-world settings was scarce. We aimed to evaluate the separate and combined effects of SBP TTR and FBG TTR on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality risks among participants with comorbidity of hypertension and diabetes. The data was derived from the Kailuan study. The target ranges for SBP and FBG were set as 110-140 mmHg and 3.9-7.0 mmol/L, and linear interpolation to calculate TTR. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the separate and combined effects of SBP TTR and FBG TTR on CVD and all-cause mortality risks. We included 11,899 participants with hypertension and diabetes comorbidity whose mean age was 54.52 ± 10.36 years, and 9,873 (83.00%) were male. After a follow-up of 6.67 years, 1,381 cases of CVD and 2,148 cases of all-cause mortality were documented. In the fully adjusted model, compared with the participants with both SBP TTR and FBG TTR lower than 25%, participants with both greater SBP TTR and FBG TTR had the lowest risks of CVD (HR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.57-0.78) and mortality (HR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.47-0.74). Per 1 SD increase in SBP TTR was associated with a 14% reduction in CVD risk (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92) and a 10% reduction in mortality risk (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), all significant results were maintained in the FBG TTR analyses. Both higher SBP TTR and FBG TTR were associated with lower risks of CVD and all-cause mortality in participants with comorbidity of hypertension and diabetes. Simultaneous control of SBP and FBG within the target ranges is a beneficial strategy for CVD prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01969-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence on the combined effect of time in the target range (TTR) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) in real-world settings was scarce. We aimed to evaluate the separate and combined effects of SBP TTR and FBG TTR on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality risks among participants with comorbidity of hypertension and diabetes. The data was derived from the Kailuan study. The target ranges for SBP and FBG were set as 110-140 mmHg and 3.9-7.0 mmol/L, and linear interpolation to calculate TTR. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the separate and combined effects of SBP TTR and FBG TTR on CVD and all-cause mortality risks. We included 11,899 participants with hypertension and diabetes comorbidity whose mean age was 54.52 ± 10.36 years, and 9,873 (83.00%) were male. After a follow-up of 6.67 years, 1,381 cases of CVD and 2,148 cases of all-cause mortality were documented. In the fully adjusted model, compared with the participants with both SBP TTR and FBG TTR lower than 25%, participants with both greater SBP TTR and FBG TTR had the lowest risks of CVD (HR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.57-0.78) and mortality (HR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.47-0.74). Per 1 SD increase in SBP TTR was associated with a 14% reduction in CVD risk (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92) and a 10% reduction in mortality risk (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), all significant results were maintained in the FBG TTR analyses. Both higher SBP TTR and FBG TTR were associated with lower risks of CVD and all-cause mortality in participants with comorbidity of hypertension and diabetes. Simultaneous control of SBP and FBG within the target ranges is a beneficial strategy for CVD prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收缩压和血糖处于目标范围的时间与心血管疾病和全因死亡风险的关系。
在现实世界中,有关收缩压(SBP)和空腹血糖(FBG)在目标范围内的时间(TTR)的综合影响的证据很少。我们旨在评估 SBP TTR 和 FBG TTR 对合并高血压和糖尿病的参与者中心血管疾病(CVD)和全因死亡率风险的单独和联合影响。数据来源于开滦研究。SBP和FBG的目标范围分别为110-140 mmHg和3.9-7.0 mmol/L,并通过线性内插法计算TTR。采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型估算 SBP TTR 和 FBG TTR 对心血管疾病和全因死亡风险的单独和合并影响。我们纳入了 11,899 名合并高血压和糖尿病的参与者,他们的平均年龄为(54.52 ± 10.36)岁,其中 9,873 人(83.00%)为男性。随访 6.67 年后,记录了 1,381 例心血管疾病和 2,148 例全因死亡病例。在完全调整模型中,与 SBP TTR 和 FBG TTR 均低于 25% 的参与者相比,SBP TTR 和 FBG TTR 均高于 25% 的参与者患心血管疾病(HR:0.53;95%CI:0.57-0.78)和死亡(HR:0.59;95%CI:0.47-0.74)的风险最低。SBP TTR 每增加 1 SD,心血管疾病风险降低 14%(HR:0.86;95% CI:0.80-0.92),死亡率风险降低 10%(HR:0.90;95% CI:0.85-0.95),所有显著结果在 FBG TTR 分析中均得以保持。在合并高血压和糖尿病的参与者中,较高的 SBP TTR 和 FBG TTR 均与较低的心血管疾病和全因死亡风险相关。同时将 SBP 和 FBG 控制在目标范围内是一种有益的心血管疾病预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
期刊最新文献
Self-measurement of blood pressure at home using a cuff device for change in blood pressure levels: systematic review and meta-analysis. Beyond pharmacotherapy: bilateral adrenal artery embolization as a potential game-changer for idiopathic hyperaldosteronism patients. Cross talk on therapeutic strategies: natriuretic peptides and inhibiting neprilysin in hypertension management. Discrepancies between home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: analysis from the Korean resistant hypertension cohort. Is a high serum uric acid level a cause or a bystander of hypertension?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1