Microbial burden on environmental surfaces in long-term care facilities: a quantitative analysis.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.129
William A Rutala, Lauren M DiBiase, Amy W Powell, Maria F Gergen, Emily E Sickbert-Bennett, Hajime Kanamori, David J Weber
{"title":"Microbial burden on environmental surfaces in long-term care facilities: a quantitative analysis.","authors":"William A Rutala, Lauren M DiBiase, Amy W Powell, Maria F Gergen, Emily E Sickbert-Bennett, Hajime Kanamori, David J Weber","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a quantitative analysis of the microbial burden and prevalence of epidemiologically important pathogens (EIP) found on long-term care facilities (LTCF) environmental surfaces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Microbiological samples were collected using Rodac plates (25cm2/plate) from resident rooms and common areas in five LTCFs. EIP were defined as MRSA, VRE, C. difficile and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative rods (GNRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rooms of residents with reported colonization had much greater EIP counts per Rodac (8.32 CFU, 95% CI 8.05, 8.60) than rooms of non-colonized residents (0.78 CFU, 95% CI 0.70, 0.86). Sixty-five percent of the resident rooms and 50% of the common areas were positive for at least one EIP. If a resident was labeled by the facility as colonized with an EIP, we only found that EIP in 30% of the rooms. MRSA was the most common EIP recovered, followed by C. difficile and MDR-GNR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found frequent environmental contamination with EIP in LTCFs. Colonization status of a resident was a strong predictor of higher levels of EIP being recovered from his/her room.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We conducted a quantitative analysis of the microbial burden and prevalence of epidemiologically important pathogens (EIP) found on long-term care facilities (LTCF) environmental surfaces.

Methods: Microbiological samples were collected using Rodac plates (25cm2/plate) from resident rooms and common areas in five LTCFs. EIP were defined as MRSA, VRE, C. difficile and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative rods (GNRs).

Results: Rooms of residents with reported colonization had much greater EIP counts per Rodac (8.32 CFU, 95% CI 8.05, 8.60) than rooms of non-colonized residents (0.78 CFU, 95% CI 0.70, 0.86). Sixty-five percent of the resident rooms and 50% of the common areas were positive for at least one EIP. If a resident was labeled by the facility as colonized with an EIP, we only found that EIP in 30% of the rooms. MRSA was the most common EIP recovered, followed by C. difficile and MDR-GNR.

Discussion: We found frequent environmental contamination with EIP in LTCFs. Colonization status of a resident was a strong predictor of higher levels of EIP being recovered from his/her room.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期护理机构环境表面的微生物负担:定量分析。
背景:我们对长期护理设施(LTCF)环境表面的微生物负担和流行病学重要病原体(EIP)进行了量化分析:我们对长期护理设施(LTCF)环境表面的微生物负担和流行病学重要病原体(EIP)的流行率进行了定量分析:使用 Rodac 平板(25 厘米2/平板)从五家长期护理机构的居民房间和公共区域收集微生物样本。EIP定义为MRSA、VRE、艰难梭菌和耐多药(MDR)革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNRs):据报告,定植了菌落的居民房间的每罗达克 EIP 计数(8.32 CFU,95% CI 8.05,8.60)远高于未定植菌落的居民房间(0.78 CFU,95% CI 0.70,0.86)。65%的居民房间和 50%的公共区域至少有一种 EIP 呈阳性。如果某位居民被医疗机构标记为定植了一种 EIP,我们仅在 30% 的房间中发现了该 EIP。MRSA 是最常见的 EIP,其次是艰难梭菌和 MDR-GNR:讨论:我们发现,长者护理中心的环境经常受到 EIP 污染。住户的菌落状态是其房间内 EIP 感染率较高的一个重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
期刊最新文献
Optimization of vancomycin use in hospitalized patients with pneumonia through implementation of informatics based antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention. Digital misinformation and antimicrobial stewardship: cross-platform epidemiologic signals from a decade of online discourse (2015-2025). Decrease in healthcare-associated infection rates in preterm infants-longitudinal data from 15 years of nationwide surveillance in Germany. Trends, predictors, and association of surgical timing with mortality among patients with Clostridioides difficile infection requiring colectomy: a cohort study. Not everyone is special: evaluation of indication in a urinalysis-driven reflex urine culture protocol at an academic medical center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1