Treatment Planning Comparison of Gantry-based and Fixed Beams for the Treatment of Liver Tumors With Carbon Ion Therapy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL In vivo Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13783
Yuya Miyasaka, Sung Hyun Lee, Hikaru Souda, Takashi Kaneko, Yasuhito Hagiwara, Hongbo Chai, Miyu Ishizawa, Hiraku Sato, Takeo Iwai
{"title":"Treatment Planning Comparison of Gantry-based and Fixed Beams for the Treatment of Liver Tumors With Carbon Ion Therapy.","authors":"Yuya Miyasaka, Sung Hyun Lee, Hikaru Souda, Takashi Kaneko, Yasuhito Hagiwara, Hongbo Chai, Miyu Ishizawa, Hiraku Sato, Takeo Iwai","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the use of a rotating gantry in liver tumor carbon-ion radiotherapy using of a fixed-port for treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients with liver tumors were analyzed. Three treatment plans were developed for each case: one with a rotating gantry with a 360° angle, one with fixed ports of 0° and 90° with a ±20° couch rolling setting, and one with fixed ports of 45° and 90° with a ±20° couch rolling setting. The dose-volume histogram parameters of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) for each treatment plan were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in the volume of the liver-gross tumor volume (GTV) of normal liver irradiated with 5 Gy to 15 Gy were found between the gantry treatment plans and fixed-port treatment plans. There were no significant differences in the OARs, except for the CTV and liver GTV, between the gantry and fixed-port treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results support the potential of using a rotating gantry to reduce liver doses, especially in the low-to-medium dose range, while maintaining target and OAR doses except for the liver. A rotating gantry could be especially useful in cases in which the relationship between the tumor and OAR is complicated by location.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"38 6","pages":"3002-3010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to compare the use of a rotating gantry in liver tumor carbon-ion radiotherapy using of a fixed-port for treatment planning.

Materials and methods: Thirty patients with liver tumors were analyzed. Three treatment plans were developed for each case: one with a rotating gantry with a 360° angle, one with fixed ports of 0° and 90° with a ±20° couch rolling setting, and one with fixed ports of 45° and 90° with a ±20° couch rolling setting. The dose-volume histogram parameters of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) for each treatment plan were compared.

Results: Significant differences in the volume of the liver-gross tumor volume (GTV) of normal liver irradiated with 5 Gy to 15 Gy were found between the gantry treatment plans and fixed-port treatment plans. There were no significant differences in the OARs, except for the CTV and liver GTV, between the gantry and fixed-port treatment plans.

Conclusion: The study results support the potential of using a rotating gantry to reduce liver doses, especially in the low-to-medium dose range, while maintaining target and OAR doses except for the liver. A rotating gantry could be especially useful in cases in which the relationship between the tumor and OAR is complicated by location.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用碳离子疗法治疗肝脏肿瘤时龙门式和固定式光束的治疗规划比较
背景/目的:本研究旨在比较在肝脏肿瘤碳离子放射治疗中使用旋转龙门与使用固定端口进行治疗计划的情况:对 30 例肝脏肿瘤患者进行了分析。为每个病例制定了三种治疗方案:一种是 360° 角旋转龙门;一种是 0° 和 90° 固定端口,±20° 沙盘滚动设置;一种是 45° 和 90° 固定端口,±20° 沙盘滚动设置。比较了每种治疗方案的临床靶体积(CTV)和危险器官(OAR)的剂量-体积直方图参数:结果:龙门式治疗方案和固定端口治疗方案的肝脏体积-正常肝脏的肿瘤总体积(GTV)在 5 Gy 至 15 Gy 照射下存在显著差异。除CTV和肝脏GTV外,龙门式治疗方案和固定端口治疗方案的OAR无明显差异:研究结果支持使用旋转龙门减少肝脏剂量的可能性,尤其是在中低剂量范围内,同时保持除肝脏外的目标剂量和OAR剂量。旋转龙门特别适用于肿瘤和OAR之间的位置关系复杂的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Liquid-based Cytological Features of Adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified, Extrauterine Adenocarcinoma, and Other Malignant Neoplasms of The Uterine Cervix: A 5-year Single-institutional Experience With 30 Consecutive Patients. Long-term Effect of the HCV Elimination With Direct-acting Antivirals on the Progression of Gastroesophageal Varices. Long-term Impacts of Long COVID: Increased Incidence of Cardiomyopathies, Joint Diseases, and Psychoanxiety Disorders. Malignant Triton Tumor of the Distal Femur: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Management of Recurrent Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia With Oritavancin: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1